Preview

The Sicilian Expedition (415-413 BC): An Overview

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1877 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Sicilian Expedition (415-413 BC): An Overview
The Sicilian Expedition (415- 413 BC): An Overview
1. Background Athens sought a reason to invade Sicily for its abundance of grain and other resources, but in initial Sicilian wars they were not presented with an opportunity. When the polis of Segesta went to war with the other Sicilian polis of Selinus, Athens was afforded an opportunity to attack not only Selinus, but also to invade and conquer Syracuse and the rest of Sicily. To encourage the Athenians to enter the war on their side, which at the time was losing their war, the Segestians offered to finance the expedition and managed to convince the Athenians they had the wealth to do so (Thuc. 6.8).
2. Politics and Preparations The debate in the Athenian assembly was split between those who favored peace and those who favored war. Nicias, appointed as a general for the expedition,
…show more content…
There the expedition was broken into three parts, each controlled by one of the three generals. The Athenian expedition consisted of; 134 triremes (100 Athenian), 5,100 hoplites (2,200 Athenian), 480 archers, 700 slingers, 120 assorted light troops, 30 cavalry, 130 other various ships and ships crews and noncombatants (Thuc. 6.43). Three ships were sent ahead to Italy to search for allies, later to return empty handed and to tell of Segesta’s financial trickery (Thuc. 6.46). Niches then suggested a show of force in Sicily and returning to Athens. Alcibiades suggested encouraging revolts against Syracuse, then attacking the polis itself. Lamachus again wanted to attack Syracuse immediately, but again sided with Alcibiades (Thuc. 6.46-50). The fleet sailed on to Catana, where Alcibiades was met by a ship from Athens and put under arrest. He took a ship and promised to return to Athens, but defected to the Spartans instead (Thuc. 6.46). Finally, the Athenian expedition linked up with the Segestan troops and wintered in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Therefore the Athenians secured in this way seven of the vessels; while with the reminder the barbicans pushed off, and taking aboard their Eretrian prisoners form the island where they had left them, doubled Cape Sunium, hoping to reach Athens before the return of the Athenians, and because of that The Athenians defeated a Persian army in the battle of Marathon.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Persian army then sailed to Attica landing near the town of marathon The Athenians and their allies the Plataea marched to marathon. At first, there plan was to contain the Persians in marathon by blocking the exits. After five days of using this tactic, the Athenians decided to attack.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greek offensive, although contributed to Miltiades as a brilliant strategic decision, is an important historiographical issue for modern historians. Herodotus tells us that opinion among the Athenian commanders was divided with some opposed to attacking with their heavily outnumbered force. Others, especially Miltiades supported an offensive strategy. Miltiades is credited with persuading the war archon Callimachus through a stirring speech to cast his deciding vote in favour of an offensive strategy. Herodotus in his narrative has Miltiades say ‘If we refuse to fight, I have little doubt that the result will be bitter”. However it has also been suggested that the Greek offensive was based on the apparent absence of the Persian cavalry which Herodotus fails to mention. This is puzzling as most modern historians acknowledge that a Persian cavalry force had already disembarked from the fleet onto land and Herodotus said the Persians chose Marathon because it was “the best ground for cavalry to manoeuvre in.”. It has also been assumed that Miltiades deployed the Greek phalanx with strong wings and a weak centre, a strategy that secured…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Athens took over the Euboea and controlled all of it. The Euboeans were furious and so they asked the Spartans to help them get the Athens out of leadership of their country. Sparta agreed so that by the end of the summer, Sparta had a large naval fleet ready to go. Sparta sailed to Euboea. Athens obviously didn’t want to lose control over them so they sent a few troop to Eretria to see if they would stop them but they wanted the Spartans to help them.…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causing them to flee to Asia, and in 479 B.C. his army followed him, pulling out of Greece. By the all of this took place time Athens had won the friendship and gained the trust of many Greek states, because of their defeat of the Persians and because of the unpopularity rule and might of the Spartan army,…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    'The Athenians and their Allies' was an organisation led by the Athenians in the 5th century, but is now referred to as the 'Delian League' or the 'Confederacy of Athens.'…

    • 2213 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As according to a resolution passed by Pericles stated no Spartan delegation would be received if the Spartans had previously initiated any hostile military actions and thus this deputation was not allowed to enter Athens. The Spartan army was at this time gathered at Corinth, and, citing this as a hostile action, the Athenians refused to admit their emissaries. With his last attempt at negotiation thus declined, Archidamus invaded Attica, but found no Athenians there; Pericles, aware that Sparta's strategy would be to invade and ravage Athenian territory, had previously arranged to evacuate the entire population of the region to within the walls of…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    He continues that the only unexpected setback they had suffered was the plague, their refusal to submit to the Lacedemonians would prompt a war as they expected along with the casualties and destruction. They cannot end their support for him because of their anger or their hatred towards him, “What heaven sends we must bear with courage –for that is the custom in our city; that is how it used to be, and that custom should not end with you” (Woodruff, 55). In this time of need the Athenians needed to keep themselves calm and collected, if the enemy found out of their distrust and displeasure with their situation trouble could…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Men who are capable of real action first make their plans and then go forward without hesitation while their enemies have still not made up their minds.” ― Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War. If there was ever a more accurate quote to describe Alcibiades, this out shone it. Through his manipulation, impressive persuasion, and eagerness to be on the winning side, Alcibiades, son of Cleinias, was able to become a prominent figure in the Peloponnesian war.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Support gathered around these two leading states. A congress met at Corinth in late autumn of 481 BC,[11] and a confederate alliance of Greek city-states was formed. It had the power to send envoys asking for assistance and to dispatch troops from the member states to defensive points after joint consultation. Herodotus calls them simply "?? ???????" (the Greeks) or "the Greeks who had banded together." Sparta and Athens had a leading role in the congress[12] but interests of all the states played a part in determining defensive strategy. Little is known about the internal workings of the congress or the discussion during its proceedings, though only 70 of the approximately 700 Greek cities sent…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alcibiades's Downfall

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alcibiades was a very skilled general -“his conduct of the war was excellent” (Thucydides, 6.15) - but he felt no loyalty to his soldiers or his country- “Alcibiades, when he laid down his command after his recall and realized he was going to be exiled, had given information about the plot, in which he was concerned himself, to the pro-Syracusans party in Messina” (Thucydides, 6.74). He betrayed the devoted soldiers, who “had openly declared that it was only on Alcibiades’ account they were going” (Plutarch, 8.19), because he was mad at Athenian government. He was intolerant of others’ success in military or political matters: “Alcibiades was vexed beyond measure at his rival’s success and out of sheer jealousy began to plot a way to violate the treaty” (Plutarch, 8.14). But his biggest failing is that the Athenians could not trust him because “his way of life made him objectionable to everyone as a person, thus they entrusted their affairs to other hands” (Thucydides, 6.15). The downfall of Athens began at Sicily, when Alcibiades was recalled “by the Athenians to stand his trial” (Plutarch, 8.20); progressed rapidly when he turned traitor, “He now decided to renounce his country altogether. So he sent word to the Spartans asking for asylum and promising that he would render him services” (Plutarch, 8.23); and was sealed when the “generals remained deaf to Alcibiades’ advice…and to all his warnings…as there were others in command now” (Plutarch, 8.37). Thucydides says that he did not cause Athens to lose the Peloponnesian War, but if his personal failings had not caused him to be untrustworthy, his military greatness might have been enough to save…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Our Debt to Themistocles

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two years later, the Persians returned with an enormous* army under Xerxes (ZURK-sees), first being delayed by, but then annihilating, the Spartans at Thermopylae, then turning toward Athens. Themistocles deliberately abandoned Athens (the Persians burned the Acropolis), moving the population west to the island of Salamis, where they were joined by remaining Spartans.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athenian resources and strategy. Athens based their ability to gather funds from the Delian League as an important part to financing for the war. Naval expeditions could be expensive and Athens would run into problems because they could not afford it. The expedition to Sicily would restrict Athens and their funds and at the battle of Aegospotami with the defeat from Sparta they could no longer afford to rebuild and so the war would come to an end. Athen will use their strong fortification and their navy to import in supplies.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P.51), by the year of 457 had encircled the city center with a massive stone wall and fortified a broad corridor with a wall on both sides leading all the way to the main harbor at Piraeus (1.107.1. P.57-58). “… Athens was now fortified sufficiently to protect its inhabitants …” (1.91.4. P. 50). Athenian fleet, built against “the prospect of the barbarian invasion” (1.14.3. P.12), and the city fortifications – made it unconquerable to direct attack. This concept laid the basis for the Athenian strategy – defense at land and offense at sea. In the light of the preparation to the war the Athenian general Pericles “gave the citizens some advice on their present affairs… They were not to go out to battle, but to come into the city and guard it, and get ready their fleet, in which their real strength lay.” (2.13.2. P.98). Protected from the land attacks by long walls down to Piraeus, Athens would behave like an island. It would avoid any direct land confrontations with Spartans at any price while its fast and mobile navy would attack Spartans at sea. To protect the population of Attica, Pericles commanded to move more than one hundred thousand people from Attica to Athens and bring them inside the city walls. As long as Athenian navy would stay supreme, Athenians could survive any siege, by resupplying from the allies of the empire. The technology of military siege machines in this period was not developed enough to break such walls easily. Consequently, regardless of what harm was done to the agricultural lands of Attica during the war, the Athenians could rely on sea power and import food by ship through their fortified port. They had huge financial resources collected from their silver mines and from the dues of the Delian League (1.99. P.53). The…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite their huge differences, both Sparta and Athens united to fight the Persians together. In the book The Portable Greek Historians by M. I. Finley, Herodotus records, “The Greeks who at this spott awaited the coming of Xerxes were the following: from Sparta, three hundred men-at-arms; from Arcadia, a thousand Tegeans and Mantineans, five hundred of people; a hundred and twenty Orchomenians, from the Arcadian Orchomenus’ and a thousand from other cities,” (Herodotus, The Persian Wars 7.202)....Herodotus continues, “The sea was in good keeping, watched by the Athenians, the Aeginetans, and the rest of the fleet,” (Herodotus, The Persian Wars 7.203). In addition, Herodotus says, “The various nations had each captains of their own under whom they served; but the one to whom all especially looked up, and who had the command of the entire force, was the Lacedaemonian, Leonidas,” (Herodotus, The Persian Wars 7.204). Based off Herodotus’ statements, all the Greeks were waiting upon Xerxes’ arrival. They included Sparta, the strongest military, Arcadia, Tegeans, Mantineans, and more. Also, the Athenians, who had the strongest navy were also accompanied by other Greeks while awaiting the arrival of the Persian navy. These records by Herodotus show the concept of Greek unity or panhellenism as Greeks from all different poleis come together to fight the stronger Persian army who were considered barbarians or outsiders. The Persians were coming to conquer Athen but all other Greek poleis refused to let Athens battle alone. Even having significant differences the Greeks appointed Spartan king Leonidas as head of command. They recognized that Sparta had the best army at the time and Leonidas was the best choice for command. Athenians and Spartans have very significant differences but in this battle they united…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays