Preview

The Significance of the Gracchi

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1265 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Significance of the Gracchi
"When Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus sought to establish the liberty of the common people and expose the crimes of the oligarchs, the guilty nobles took fright and opposed their proceedings by every means at their disposal" - Cicero. The Gracchi Brothers were revolutionary in both their goals and achievements, as they changed the politics, the economic situation and the social problems of the Roman Republic. During the Gracchi's existence, Rome was facing a number of social, political and economic problems. They were frustrated with the conservatism and selfishness of the oligarchy and so adopted methods that threatened the balance between the senate, the magistrates and the people, which had existed for a very long time - in this way they can be regarded as revolutionary.

After the Second Punic War, the Senate became the supreme power and as a result, many changes occurred throughout Rome. The ruling Oligarchy abused their power, caring more for their own material interests than the welfare of the republic. As a result major problems occurred throughout Rome. Serious economic social problems occurred, both rural and urban, causing grave distress among many Roman citizens. There was a military crisis, with lack of eligible recruits for the legions, aggravated by the Spanish and Sicilian wars. There was tension in the oligarchy between leading factions as they struggled for political superiority. And amongst all these problems was the failure of the ruling nobility within the senate to deal with these problems.

In 133BCE, Tiberius Gracchus attempted to solve Rome's problems, specifically the land crisis. He introduced the Lex Agraria, a bill for land reform, which proposed that a commission of three people should allocate smallholdings of land owned by the state to landless citizens. The bill was met with great controversy; however, it wasn't the content of the bill that provoked the reaction, rather the means with which it was proposed. As Stockton notes "It

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Gracchus brothers are two brothers named Tiberius and Gaius who were called tribunes. These two wanted to pass land reform legislations that would redistribute the land among the poor and veterans from the wealth aristocrats. The law stated that “No one citizen would be able to possess more than 620 acres of public land.” The senate of Rome didn't like what the brothers were doing so they immediately had them killed. In a way the brothers were killed just because they were trying to help the poor make a living or at least give them a chance to provide for their families.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the classical age, Rome transitioned from a republic to an empire. During this time Rome’s senate was weakened becoming nothing more than a meaningless place for debates. This was because Rome became an empire in which the emperor had absolute power. While the senate was weakened Rome still controlled trade throughout the Mediterranean. This was due to Rome’s victory over Carthage in the Punic Wars. As Rome changed from a republic to an empire one change was that the senate lost power…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Sallust stated, “Greed destroyed honor, honesty and taught men to be arrogant and cruel. Ambition made men false. Rome changed.” The Roman Republic was critically weakened between 78 and 49 BC. The underlying flaws within the structure of the Senate and the republic itself, political corruption and violence and the formation of the first triumvirate, which should not have been permitted under the democratic state, all contributed to its decline. Manipulating these decaying social and political conditions were significant individuals, who, despite the efforts of the senate, rose to prominence and power, which culminated in Civil war.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman government was very unstable. Military generals and commanders fought among themselves for the throne, and this also led to an untrustworthy army. There was a strong sense of distrust among the army men, and so there was also feelings of loyalty weakening among average citizens as well. In a desperate effort to reconstruct their army, the government employed mercenaries, although these were also not trustworthy because their loyal lied in whoever paid them. Inflation also caused major problems. A drastic drop in the value of money coupled with a rise in prices caused famine and increased poverty, leading to the deaths of many and a significant drop in population. All these problems opened the empire to invading peoples.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Rome DBQ Essay

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    farmers gave up when the grain price decreased with the massive importation of grain from Sicily and North Africa. When they gave up they moved to cities and joined the work force there. Then, a change in society started to happen. The number of people in the countryside was reduced because they wanted to escape war or would rather settle in the cities than in the countryside after war. As a result, Rome became overpopulated. Another change that happened because of the Punic Wars was the Senate gained power and the society realized that the Senate had authority over military action. The Punic Wars really transformed Rome and helped to build their empire and society.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Owners of latifundias operated at lower costs than did owners of smaller holdings. These owners often resulted to mortgaging their lands to aristocrats due to the fact that they could not compete with the latifundias. Thus, causing unemployment and famines for this class. These peasants moved to cities, where they became “mobs”. Wealthy patricians often hired people into personal armies. Civil wars i.e. Caesar and Pompey, often broke out between high ranking officials, thus leading to political instability. During the first and second century CE of Rome, there were social tensions due to the unequal land distribution. As a way to mend the unequal land distribution issue, reformers attempted to redistribute the land, i.e. Gracchi Brothers, Tiberius and Gaius. Unfortunately these men did not succeed due to the fact that most members of the wealthy and ruling classes disagreed with the ideas of the brothers and found their way around their redistribution method. In fact, this action caused them to pay a high price – their lives. For fear that the brothers would have a greater effect on Roman affairs, their enemies had them assassinated. Wang Mang, just as the Gracchi Brothers had attempted with Rome, tried to reform the distribution of land in China.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Gracchus brothers Tiberius, Gaius were members of the plebeians. They wanted to do many things to help out Rome. The brothers made land reforms to help the landless poor. This system involved recruiting the urban and rural poor people. Tiberius and Gaius took land from the rich and gave it to the small farmers so they would have some land to feed off of and be able to make money.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus became tribune, one of his first actions were proposing a law which would have regulated the use of the public lands of the Roman people. Rome had fought countless wars against their neighbors. Thus, Rome had acquired a lot of land. “The core of the measure was…that limited to 500 iugera (about 300 acres or 120 hectarces) the amount of “public” land that a single individual could exploit merely by occupying it.”(Boatwright, 87) Tiberius wanted to give citizens a maximum amount of land deemed public to occupy. Along with this, he proposed the excess was to be confiscated and then distributed into small portions amongst citizens who didn’t own any land. With the increase in…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Perhaps Tiberius had seen a way to solve all this and to strengthen the security of Rome's army with his land reform. With this, he became popular and gained a large clientelae. He had also set some precedents by bypassing the Senate and proposing the land bill directly to the Assembly rather than showing the Senate first. He had tried for tribune for a second year. Both these precedents had shown the tribunes what they do with their power, and how to use it properly (or…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Republican period of Roman history began in 509 BCE after the last Etruscan kings was dropped. The Republic was controlled by the Senate, which was an assembly by dominated upper-class families. This dominance by the aristocracy led to tensions between the social classes, especially among the lower classes who fought for equality in both the economy and the government. Despite these inner struggles, Rome's military power strengthened throughout the 5th and 4th centuries BCE and by 270 BCE they commanded the entire peninsula. 264 BCE brought the beginning of the three Punic Wars fought against Carthage over control of the western Mediterranean. These resulted in victories for Rome which granted them access to the wealth of Greece, Egypt,…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Romans overthrew the Etruscans in 509 B.C.E. The Etruscans had ruled over the Romans for hundreds of years. Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls who ruled the Roman republic. A senate composed of Patricians elected these consuls and at this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government. Both men and women were citizens in the Roman Republic, but only men could vote. Under certain circumstances, the senate and the consuls could appoint a temporary dictator to rule for a limited time until the crisis was resolved. One of the innovations of the Roman Republic was the notion of equality under the law. In 449 B.C.E., government leaders carved some of Rome 's most important laws into 12 great tablets. During the last three centuries of the republic, Rome experienced a long series of civil wars, economic as well as political issues, and civil crisis caused by the dictatorship of Julius Caesar. After Caesar’s death, another civil war broke out destroying what was left of the Roman republic. Caesar’s adopted son, Octavian, joined forces with a general named Mark Antony and a politician named Lepidus. They took control of Rome for ten years as the Second triumvirate. The alliance ended in violence and jealousy. Octavian forced Lepidus to retire and then became rivals with Mark Antony. Octavian believed Mark Antony was plotting to rule Rome from Egypt,…

    • 1420 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there were many contributing factors to the Roman Republic's decline over the course of several decades, most historians concur that the most important ones were the disintegration of political institutions and the emergence of strong military leaders who threatened the Senate's authority and the established power structure. Two interrelated factors primarily contributed to the Republican system's downfall: the widening social and economic divide between the affluent elites and the general populace, and Rome's military conquests, which made it more difficult for the government to control its soldiers and territories. The rise of wealthy and influential politicians who could influence elections and earn public support was one of the…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They are important for two reasons. First, Tiberius saw that one of the great problems of Rome was debt and poverty of the free population. He saw that the wealthier were simply getting more than their fair share and the poor were being pushed off the land. So, he wanted to redistribute land.…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are various points Tacitus uses the praise that frequently heaps on his father-in-law Agricola as a vehicle for condemning the values of contemporary Rome. First, Tacitus describes Agricola’s character a man who had no “…incorruptibility and self-restraint in a man of his caliber would be to insult his virtues”. By stating this, Tacitus send a message to everyone that all the other consult and leaders were driven by corrupt and self-interest. Tacitus gave a clear picture of the values of all higher rank officials as well as the people who were aspiring to attain power. They were driven by greed, corruption, and the motive to attain all the power. Secondly, Tacitus describes Agricola as someone who “…scorning all rivalry with his colleagues,…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays

Related Topics