Preview

The Similarities Between Neanderthals And Modern Humans

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1273 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Similarities Between Neanderthals And Modern Humans
Home neanderthalensis (or Neanderthals) are the closest prehistoric relatives of humans (1). They were believed to have co-existed with modern humans in Europe and Asia. The physical characteristics of these Neanderthals are different from modern humans in some ways. Some experts say that this is due to evolution. There are different theories regarding their connection with the modern humans, as well as their disappearance from the face of the Earth. There is a number of Neanderthal fossils that were discovered from different parts of the world mainly in Eurasia. Two of these are the fossils found in Kebara Cave and El Sidron Cave.
Neanderthals were recognized as a distinct group of hominids after the discovery of fossils 150 years ago at
…show more content…

The similarities among these fossils were described and have been generalized. The physical characteristics of Neanderthals include massive limb bones, barrel chest, thick bone ridges, huge protruding face and nose, receding forehead, an absence of a well-dignified chin, bun-like bulge on the back of the skull, and slightly larger brain than humans. These physical traits suggest that Neanderthals were brutal species (4). The figure below showed the comparison between the skulls of the modern humans and …show more content…

Out-of-Africa theory of human evolution suggests that modern human co-existed and replaced the Neanderthals population. This can be seen in the mitochondrial DNA sequencing done by several scientists. There were analyses recently that strongly support the gene flow between Neanderthals and modern humans in Eurasia, but not in Africa (6). One of the most important parts of doing a DNA analysis is their teeth. It contains a permanent record of growth of both humans and Neanderthals. A study by the scientists using a Neanderthal tooth has found no difference between their growth pattern and that of a human. In 2006, Paabo and his colleagues had traced nearly million letters of their DNA

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab Write Up

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tooth formula is a shorthand technique that biologist use to keep track of the teeth on a particular jaw. The formula consisted of two lines, top jaw and bottom jaw, which were used to count how many incisors, canines, premolars, and molar teeth a species had. Species A, Odocoileus virginiaus (white-tailed deer), had a tooth formula of 0033/3133. On the top jaw, the deer had zero incisor and canine teeth but have three of both the premolars and molars. On the bottom jaw, the deer had three incisors, one canine, three premolars, and three molars. Species B, Canis latrans (coyote), had a tooth formula of 3142/3143. On the top jaw, the coyote had three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and two molars. On the bottom jaw, the coyote has three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and three molars. Both the deer and coyote skull were long and skinny towards the nose and mouth. The coyote skull had a much rounder nose than the deer. Species C, Homo sapiens (human), had a tooth formula of 2122/2122. On both the top and bottom jaws, there were two incisors, one canine, two premolars, and two molars. In comparison to the deer and coyote skull, the human was an outcast. The human skull was a short distance from the back of the skull to the front. The human skull was very different in bone structure and longer in height than the deer and coyote skulls.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In her article entitled “Close Encounters of the Prehistoric Kind”, Science Magazine correspondent Ann Gibbons explains that due to interbreeding between Neanderthals and early modern humans, modern humans still contain traces of prehistoric Neanderthal DNA. According to researchers, Asians and Europeans most likely possess a higher frequency of Neanderthal genomes than Africans because the two species “occupied the [same regions] intermittently” in Europe, the Midwest, the Near East, and Russia and may have coexisted with one another for up to 10,000 years before the Neanderthal lineage died out. The article explains that Neanderthal genomes are present in “many people living outside of Africa” as there was not enough interbreeding occurring…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Methods in Evolutionary Anthro & Archaeology Early Hominins Homo erectus and Homo floresiensis Reading week - no class…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Empirical evidence that supports speech capabilities among H. neandertal could mean origins of modern language, larger cultural leaps than once thought and a variety of social relationships among these archaic Homo Sapiens . It is generally agreed that origins of language are closely tied to the origins of modern human behavior, although there is little agreement on the implications. The discovery of the hyoid bone, reconstructions of the vocal tract including the cranial base and the larynx, the DNA sequence of H. neandertal that carried the FOXP2 gene (fork head box protein) and is known as the…

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theory that Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens are cousins focuses on the time period when both existed and the geographic locations of both groups. Homo Sapiens lived in Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and India prior to the third interglacial period, the proposed time of contact. Neanderthals developed in East Asia in the colder…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Click the arrow in the bottom right corner of the screen to proceed to Slide 2 and begin the Click and…

    • 1677 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time Frame: Neanderthals diverged over 550,000 to 690,000 years ago. Other data estimates they lived between 365,000 and 853,000 years ago and 465,000 before present. Human trunk and limb bones of Homo antecessor, recovered from the Gran Dolina site in Spain have been dated at about 780,000 years old and are said to represent the last common ancestor for modern humans and Neanderthals. Phylogenetic analysis of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA leads to a date for the common ancestor of the Neanderthal and modern humans at around 465,000 to 600,000 years ago. Archaeologists have found much physical evidence to confirm this date, such as the 0.73 Mya old fossils with stone tools and animal bones. The other date matches the movement of modern humans out of Africa and the appearance of modern traits in fossil skulls. Fossil skull traits such as high rounded skulls and small brow ridges, a vertical forehead and a pronounced chin first appear in Africa about 130,000 years ago. They then appear outside of Africa over 90,000 years ago.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming Human Worksheet

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    larger Brains short heavy set Body hunters Food Source Why are the teeth of children particularly helpful in providing information about extinct hominids?…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have found many different fossils of ancient hominids and have named 18 types. Fossils are classified as hominids when they share some characteristics of modern humans; but each type of hominid was unique because of its size, the way that they walked, the shape of its skull and many other characteristics.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two theories about the origin of modern humans; the out of Africa view argues that genes in the fully modern human all came out of Africa and there was no interbreeding involved and the alternative model; a multi-regional view that argues how all human population flowed between different regions and mixed together which contributed to the development of the modern human. What makes these theories the most highly debateable in paleoanthropology is that 30,000 years ago, the taxonomic diversity previously seen amongst homo sapiens, homo erectus and homo Neanderthals had vanished and humans everywhere had evolved into the anatomically and behaviourally modern form; there is much deliberation as to how this occurred which rose this differing schools of thought; one that emphasises multiregional continuity and the other that suggests a single origin for modern humans. In order to understand this controversy, the archaeological, anatomical and genetic evidence needs to be evaluated.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Major Trends in Hominin Evolution are diet, cultural evolution, encephalization, language and speech Diet; In addition to forcing changes in locomotion that led to walking upright, the increasingly dry climate of east Africa over the last six million years forced changes in the diet of early hominins from the soft fruits of the tropical rain forest to the increasingly fibrous and tough foods available in open habitats.Early hominin diets are reconstructed partly based on the surface areas of the molars and the cross-sectional area of the body of the lower jaw (Collard…

    • 3142 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since humans and other primates share a variety of characteristics, other primates provide important observations about early humans. Homologies between hominids and other primates enhance to behavior because the physiological and cognitive formations that manage to control human demeanor are likely related to those of other primates than to members of other taxonomic groups. The reality of this broad collection of homologous traits, the commodity of the average evolutionary history of the primates, means that nonhuman primates give beneficial examples for understanding the evolutionary ancestry of hominid morphology and for resolving the basis of human nature.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contrast to Homo Sapiens, Neanderthals were of robust stature with broad shoulders and small lower limbs. There is evidence of sexual dimorphism in Neanderthals, with males much larger than female counterparts. There is also intense controversy surrounding the fact if Neanderthals culture & customs, whether they had a language or buried their dead, the use of cave art such as that found in Gorham cave in Gibraltr, as shown below, for decoration would perhaps give precedence to the idea that Neanderthals had complex interactions with each other and their…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neanderthal Culture War

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Neanderthals lived in what is now Europe for hundreds of thousands of years before humans arrived. Last year, researchers dated the oldest human skull found outside of Africa, in Manot Cave in Israel, to 55,000 years old. That marks the known start to a time when the two hominids lived side by side, a period likely full of interaction and competition for food and other resources. By 45,000 years ago, humans had arrived in Europe. Some 5,000 years later, the Neanderthals were extinct.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will mainly focus about the similarities and differences of our species with Primates. Primates have been considered as our closest relative of our species many other's believe that primates are very much like humans while some disagree with this point saying that the primates are nothing compared to us because we have evolved and intelligently smarter. In my opinion that Humans and Primates share similarities that can define them as our closest relative of our own species but also differences in our physical biology we share certain similarities and differences in Social interactions, Emotional expressions, and Intelligence.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays