The Sociological Perspective on Basketball
The Sociological perspective on basketball
In sociology, there are 3 paradigms. There is the conflict theory perspective, the symbolic-interaction perspective and the structural-functionalist perspective. From a conflict paradigm point of view, the essay would focus on gender and how the assumption that girls lack the same level of strength and stamina as men. The WNBA (Women National Basketball League) doesn’t get the same amount of respect as the males do in the NBA (National Basketball League). Another issue could be that the NBA players have a higher annual salary than an average teacher. A structural-functionalist approach could be focused on how it creates jobs (the NBA) and academically too. Basketball could also be focused on how it also entertainment for the public and how it could build ones character. From a symbolic-interaction perspective, not only can it be focus on how basketball unifies people together, but it also has to ability to express aggression in a positive, rather than destructive way. Another example could be how two different players can have the same goal, but different motivates. One player can be motivated by the love for the game and another can be motivated by the thrill of competition. The best paradigm out of the 3 to study for the game of basketball would from a structural-functionalist perspective. From a structural-functionalist perspective, basketball can have a huge affect on people lives. Friendships can also be created by having a conversation about basketball or after playing a game of basketball. One of the biggest things about basketball is how entertaining it can be on television. Another view points from a structural-functionalist perspective are the job opportunities the game of basketball is given. Since the NBA has such a huge fan base, there are many jobs given. When there are games being played in arenas, there’s a plenty of jobs given in the arena and with those opportunities, it expands the economy.
In sociology, there are 3 paradigms. There is the conflict theory perspective, the symbolic-interaction perspective and the structural-functionalist perspective. From a conflict paradigm point of view, the essay would focus on gender and how the assumption that girls lack the same level of strength and stamina as men. The WNBA (Women National Basketball League) doesn’t get the same amount of respect as the males do in the NBA (National Basketball League). Another issue could be that the NBA players have a higher annual salary than an average teacher. A structural-functionalist approach could be focused on how it creates jobs (the NBA) and academically too. Basketball could also be focused on how it also entertainment for the public and how it could build ones character. From a symbolic-interaction perspective, not only can it be focus on how basketball unifies people together, but it also has to ability to express aggression in a positive, rather than destructive way. Another example could be how two different players can have the same goal, but different motivates. One player can be motivated by the love for the game and another can be motivated by the thrill of competition. The best paradigm out of the 3 to study for the game of basketball would from a structural-functionalist perspective. From a structural-functionalist perspective, basketball can have a huge affect on people lives. Friendships can also be created by having a conversation about basketball or after playing a game of basketball. One of the biggest things about basketball is how entertaining it can be on television. Another view points from a structural-functionalist perspective are the job opportunities the game of basketball is given. Since the NBA has such a huge fan base, there are many jobs given. When there are games being played in arenas, there’s a plenty of jobs given in the arena and with those opportunities, it expands the economy.