Preview

The Soldier

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
335 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Soldier
The Soldier by Rupert Brooke
Versus
Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen

Thesis: There are several differences between Brooke and his poem and Owen and his poem.

1.) Owen vs. Brooke
2.) Owen’s Poem vs. Brooke’s Poem
3.) Owen’s opinion of the war vs. Brooke’s opinion of the war
4.) Conclusion

Both of these poems took place during World War I. This was a very dark and gloomy time period. Though both of these poems are very different they are both true of the war. There are many differences between Rupert Brooke and his poem entitled, “The Soldier,” and Wilfred Owen’s poem entitled, “Dulce et Decorum Est.”

Wilfred Owen was born in 1893 and died in 1918 in combat. He volunteered for the war, was injured and then put in the hospital. After he recuperated he went back into combat and died in action. Rupert Brooke was born in 1887 and died in 1915. However, Mr. Brooke unwillingly volunteered and died by a mosquito bite on the first day.

Wilfred Owen’s poem was about how real the war really was. But Rupert Brooke’s poem portrayed the war to be patriotic. Both of these poems were correct in their own minds. However, in the real world standing Owen is the one I believe we would side with.

Wilfred Owen’s opinion in the beginning was pro-war, but in the end he realized how terrible the war really was, he also wanted the people back home to realize it too. However, Brooke didn’t want to have anything to do with the war at all, as it turns out his girlfriend’s opinion overruled his. He portrayed it to be patriotic, but he also wasn’t in the war but one day.

In conclusion, what can be gathered from both of these poems is this: there can be several different opinions about one thing or one thought. Yet all of them can be either right or wrong. But only one can be applied to one’s life.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    World War 1 was the bloodiest war, and was a very important part of history, yet so many people only know one side of the war. Most people know the side of Jessie Pope and the Armchair Poets. Jessie Pope and the Armchair poets wrote poems about war, sitting in the comfort of their own home. Jessie Pope praised war; she made war sound so wonderful and encouraged young men to join the war efforts. Wilfred Owen did not like that those poets did not truly know what was going on, yet pretended that they did know. Wilfred Owen’s poem is very significant in the way that the poem shows what war is really like. Owen’s poem quickly became my favorite poem ever written. Therefore, I recommend that you keep Owen’s poem “Dulce et Decorum Est,” because he uses imagery and alliteration to effectively relay that war is cruel, and war is lied about.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert Bridges 'Eros'

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare and contrast the two poems; analyzing how poet uses literary devices to make his point.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both John McCrae and Wilfred Owen were poets and soldiers during World War One, but they both had different roles and experiences in the war, so it makes sense that each of their poems are different, and relate to what they personally went through. John McCrae was posted as a medical officer, and took care of fallen soldiers. McCrae wrote the renowned poem “In Flanders Fields” the day after presiding over the funeral and burial of his friend Lieutenant Alex Helmer. This funeral shaped John McCrae’s outlook on war, which was revealed throughout his poetry. Wilfred Owen’s outlook on the war is dramatically different than McCrae’s because of his own two traumatic experiences. These traumatic experiences sent him to a treatment center, where…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In the selection of Owen’s poems, compare the ways in which he reflects on the price paid by soldiers during wartime. You should look for connections across the poems studied, in relation both to the situations and feelings described and the way in which Owen has used language for effect.”…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wilfred Owen was born in 1893 and became known as one of the most outstanding poets of the 1st world war. He himself fought on the front line during the war and witnessed first hand the extreme situations and terrible conditions soldiers experienced. Owen felt that war was pointless causing nothing but pain and suffering and this is shown in many of his poems. Both poems ‘Exposure’ and ‘Spring Offensive’ show the extreme situations and inhuman misery that soldiers went through.…

    • 2015 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilfred Owen was the greatest war poet in World War I. His work on the poems were hugely significant because they challenge the notion accepted by society of what it was like for men to go to war. His varying narrative perspective puts him sometimes at the heart of the action and sometimes as a observer, but he never fails to convey the experience of the everyday man, the horrors and realities of war, and the psychological impact on its participates.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Poetry Essay Prompt

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Prompt: Read both poems carefully and then write an essay in which you explain what characteristics of the second poem make it better than the first. Refer specifically to details of both poems.…

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The poems I have chosen to compare in this essay are Wilfred Owen's “Dulce Et Decorum Est” and Jessie Pope's “Who's For The Game?”. The two poems I have chosen to compare are both about the first world war. Yet the two poems have very different opinions on the Great War. My first poem, Dulce et decorum, is against the war and the injustice of it all. It is narrated by one of the soldiers who is fighting in the Great War and having to face the horrors of war. On the contrary my second poem, Who's for the game, is a recruitment poem.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    descrptive writing

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Write about both poems and their effect on you. Show how they are similar and how they are different.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wilfred Owen

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wilfred Owen’s poetry, shaped by an intense focus on extraordinary human experiences, compels us to look more closely at the nature of war.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    These two poems are similar in the sense that they both share horrors from World War I. They both want peace throughout the nations, in order to end the war. They are different because Rupert Brooke’s…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a final point, both poems develop their point of view and impact their readers in different ways. Wilfred Owen believes that war isn’t just and people shouldn’t die for their countries over war. Jessie Pope believes that you should be proud to be called upon to fight for your country when it is in need of your help. In both poems, they explain why they believe this and go deeper into supporting what they believe. These poets defend what they believe, but it’s all up to the readers who follow the poet who they believe is the opposite of…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soldiers of both German and allied sides had shown great initial enthusiasm to war. The attitude to war on both German and allied sides was near equally the same. Soldiers had seen war as an adventure. These soldiers engaged in excitement, patriotic fervor, and saw war as a value of noble self sacrifice. Soldiers were perceived as a coward if they had not enlisted to go to war. Women would hand them a white feather, symbolising that they did not show pride in their country. This glorious adventure was backed up by the feeling that both spiritual renewal and courage could be developed. Soldiers believed that the war would be over Christmas and many had feared that war would be over before they had even got involved. Captain Julian Grenfell, in a letter to his mother during war, had emphasized that he “adore(s) war, it’s like a big picnic without the object lesson of a picnic. I’ve never been so well or so happy… it is all the best fun.” As depicted from a photograph of a crowd in Berlin at the outbreak of war in 1914, many numerous young men are saluting their hats the sky and singing praises due to the outbreak of war, outlining happiness and excitement, through the expression evident on their faces. War poet, Wilfred Owen, outlines the enthusiasm and keenness to join war as he emphasizes that, “O meet it is and passing sweet, to live in peace with others, but sweet still and far more meet, to die in war for brothers.” Owen encourages readers to enlist for war as it is a honor and a credit to serves for ones country. War poet Rupert Brooke, in his poem, ‘The Soldier,’ mentions, “…and think, this heart, all evil shed away…laughter, learnt of friends and gentleness,” as he outlines the positive experiences of…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Poetry

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages

    |Write about both poems and their effect on you. Show how they are similar and how they are different. |…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    in my iop,using wilfred owen’s dulce et decorum est I would would like to contest roperrt brookes pro war or rather patriotic ideology , in effect the iop contradicts every statement or thought brooke through owens ideas and his use of literaray techniques.i will do this by contradicting the different views of both the poets which they have expressed by the use of literary techniques like imagery, the tone/atmosphere of the poem ,comparing thier ideas and messages and their style of writing.both the poets were soldiers during the world war 1 and noth have different points of view about war..owen opposes the idea of war and debunks the myths about war touted by poet like roopert broke who glorified war and believed it was right for one to sacrifice their life for ones country.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays