The Stanford Person Experiment
What is the title of the text and what is the text about?
The title of the Text I have read for this assignment is a Stanford person experiment which was written by Lei head, A. (2011). “Experimental research practiced in Stanford person”
2. What is the author’s view? How do I know? The author’s view in my understanding to give justification about Stanford prison experiment illegal action against humanity and ethical guilty research ever seen in the history of scientific research system. How do I know? From the author clear statement and from the story itself (Lei head, 2011).
3. What is the evidence presented by the author to support ideas? The author provided much detailed and provided supportive and tangible evidence against this action, for example, we can see few statements from the story itself tells us that the experiment research was prepared by free welling of students who want to …show more content…
voluntarily participate in the scientific experiment positively. But unfortunately thing were gone out of touched and changed to different direction and actions of brutality take place and serious crime against life volunteers' students (Lei head, 2011).
4.
Is the evidence valid? How do I know? I believe so and absolutely no question about that evidence is valid, because the story itself tells much more of this reality and it is so painful and completely brutality and unnecessarily stapes taken by bud guys, also the worst part of this dangerous crime were never stopped right away and continued with their senseless and also not have mercy for the expensive life and never learn from their mistake stopped right away but sadly humiliation continued until the end (Lei head, 2011).
5. Is the evidence relevant? How do I know? The evidence is very relevant in my opinion, because the evidence given in the story is proven and practical and also the evidence is depend up physical charge as well. Therefore, this process was completely not a good example of our scientific experiment system ever seen in the history (Lei head, 2011).
6. Have I heard/read anything similar or dissimilar? What was it? Personally I have never heard or read anything crime like this in scientific research level, but in regular criminal history probably
yes.
7. Do I agree or disagree with the views expressed by the author? Why?
I do agree with the views expressed by the author because we all expected our grate scientific research should be well build up on the reality and keep the grate standard of what scientific research experiment has to do, but no wanted that the research experiment do charge lives and become ethical guilt and also no excuse of criminals responsible. References
Lei head, A. (2011). Stanford prison experiment. BBC news, Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-14564182
The title of the Text I have read for this assignment is a Stanford person experiment which was written by Lei head, A. (2011). “Experimental research practiced in Stanford person”
2. What is the author’s view? How do I know? The author’s view in my understanding to give justification about Stanford prison experiment illegal action against humanity and ethical guilty research ever seen in the history of scientific research system. How do I know? From the author clear statement and from the story itself (Lei head, 2011).
3. What is the evidence presented by the author to support ideas? The author provided much detailed and provided supportive and tangible evidence against this action, for example, we can see few statements from the story itself tells us that the experiment research was prepared by free welling of students who want to …show more content…
voluntarily participate in the scientific experiment positively. But unfortunately thing were gone out of touched and changed to different direction and actions of brutality take place and serious crime against life volunteers' students (Lei head, 2011).
4.
Is the evidence valid? How do I know? I believe so and absolutely no question about that evidence is valid, because the story itself tells much more of this reality and it is so painful and completely brutality and unnecessarily stapes taken by bud guys, also the worst part of this dangerous crime were never stopped right away and continued with their senseless and also not have mercy for the expensive life and never learn from their mistake stopped right away but sadly humiliation continued until the end (Lei head, 2011).
5. Is the evidence relevant? How do I know? The evidence is very relevant in my opinion, because the evidence given in the story is proven and practical and also the evidence is depend up physical charge as well. Therefore, this process was completely not a good example of our scientific experiment system ever seen in the history (Lei head, 2011).
6. Have I heard/read anything similar or dissimilar? What was it? Personally I have never heard or read anything crime like this in scientific research level, but in regular criminal history probably
yes.
7. Do I agree or disagree with the views expressed by the author? Why?
I do agree with the views expressed by the author because we all expected our grate scientific research should be well build up on the reality and keep the grate standard of what scientific research experiment has to do, but no wanted that the research experiment do charge lives and become ethical guilt and also no excuse of criminals responsible. References
Lei head, A. (2011). Stanford prison experiment. BBC news, Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-14564182