Preview

The Stanford Prison Experiment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
276 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The stanford prison experiment

Assignment #3
Watch the video on the Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment available in the Webliography (Quiet Rage http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/quiet-rage-the-stanford-prison-experiment/). In your Threaded Discussion, worth 20 pts, post your thoughts regarding the following discussion questions excerpted from Zimbardo:

1) Was it ethical to do this study? Was it right to trade the suffering experienced by participants for the knowledge gained by the research? (The experimenters did not take this issue lightly, although the Slide Show may sound somewhat matter-of-fact about the events and experiences that occurred). "I think that it was ethical to do this study, I also don't think that it was right to do the study the way the researchers did."

2) How do the ethical dilemmas is this research compare with the ethical issues raised by Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments? Would it be better if these studies had never been done?

"I watched it and I understand why they did the research, the reasearchers where trying to see how depression/anger is developed by inflecting these acting inmates in various studys through acts of hazying and mistreatings and the researchers did acomplish this."

3) If you were the experimenter in charge, would you have done this study? Would you have terminated it earlier? Would you have conducted a follow-up study?

"I would have termianted this study or stoped at a certain point and started a study on how to heal these people after such unnessay behavior instead of just leting the people continue to go about there lives being left as victumes of a experiment gone

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Asch’s and Milgram’s experiment achieved results. Moreover, much knowledge was gained from them. However ethical issues were raised in both experiments. In Aschs study, informed consent was not provided. The participants were unaware it was a conformity test.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the infamous experiment in the history of psychology was the Stanford Prison Experiment. Its creator, Dr. Zimbardo, main objective was to see what effects would occur when a psychological experiment into human nature was performed. As I began to perform some research of my own, I noticed that my thoughts on the matter were similar to many; that as a scientific research project, Mr. Zimbardo’s experiment it was a complete failure. However, his findings did provide us with something that was much more important that is still being talked about today; insight into human psychology and social behavior.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A team at Stanford University, led by Phillip Zimbardo, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment to investigate causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. Zimbardo and his team were seeking to observe the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards and see if this was the chief cause of abusive behavior in these settings (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). This study is one that is well know and well-recognized. Zimbardo and his study are often discussed in many psychology courses today, and have even caused reform in prison systems as well as IRB/APA ethical committees.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In August of 1971, Phillip Zimbardo constructed a mock correctional facility. Placing an ad in a local newspaper, and with over 70 responses, he conducted interviews with 70 male candidates across the U.S. and out of those 70 candidates 24 of them were sorted out through mental diseases, drug abuse, and psychological issues. With a pay of $15/a day, he divided the candidates, 9 guards and 9 prisoners. He constructed the basement floor at Stanford into a correctional facility taking the doors off hinges and replacing them with steel door with bars and cell numbers. Each prisoner was stripped and searched and sprayed, the same way as if they were going to a real prison. Each prisoner was given robes to wear with their own prisoner number on the back and on the front, and they could only go by prisoner numbers not by name. They also were given rubber slippers and chains wrapped around their ankles and hair nets as opposed to shaving their heads. There were three cells will three cots each, enough for the 9 prisoners. Each 8 hour shift had three guards each and even some on call for back up. The first day went well with no incident, the second day however the prisoners began to riot by taking off their hairnets, pulling off their numbers off their robes. Being outrages and infuriated the guards went into each cell stripped the prisoners, took their cots, and sprayed them with the fire extinguisher. The ringleader of the riot was put into solitary confinement by the guards. After only 36 hours, one prisoner #8612 then began to act crazy, to scream, to curse, to go into a rage that seemed…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many faults with the experiment which breached ethical boundaries. It should be questioned why the experiment was allowed to continue for so long when the participants were psychologically traumatized and physically beaten? By the third day the participants were showing immense psychological and physical trauma, falling under unethical treatment of human rights. There is no proof of confidentiality breach as it was told the…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experiments have been done for many more years than humans can count on the two hands in which they possess. Two experiments, in particular, were written, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram. These experiments can be controversial for many different reasons, but neither of these experiments were completed under conditions of normality. The information collected in these experiments isn’t exactly based off of real life situations, it becomes difficult not to question the relevance of these experiments.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Identify four aspects of Milgram’s study that encouraged the participants to behave in a highly obedient way One condition that encouraged the participants was the prestigious setting. Second the participants feels obliged to not to disturb the experiment. Third participants assumed discomfort was mild and temporary. Last aspect is that participants can discuss choices with someone else. Describe one ethical issue raised in Milgram’s study.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment violated research ethics by not protecting research participants, which is a major issue. According to ACJS code standards, “Research should expose participants to no more than minimal risk of personal harm. Researchers should fully disclose the purpose of their research. Participation in research should be voluntary, and therefore subjects must be given their informed consent to participate in the research. Confidentiality must be maintained for individual research participants unless it is voluntarily and explicitly waived” (Bachman & Schutt, 2008). These ethical principles are significantly important guidelines that should be followed by science professionals. However, in the case of the Stanford Prison Experiment,…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford prison experiment practiced unethical methods that put unnecessary harm on the prisoners, and social accountability of guards was to guarantee prisoner's safety. However, the guards engaged performed horrible acts of violence that harmed the prisoners physical and mental distress. The prisoner's human rights violated by the individuals that were selected to be guards committed cruel treatment, inhuman acts, and degrading treatment. The guards did not practice ethical behaviors enforcing punishment that was physically and mentally harmful and the unethical behavior of the guards was extremely unethical behavior in a controlled scientific environment. The alternate method is fieldwork process that research that allows the researcher…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison experiment was study about mental health and how people will abuse their power if given the chance. The results from the Stanford experiment were astounding. We learned that environments can have an impact on our behavior. Our social environments can define us. In the Stanford prison experiment the prisoners broke down, rebelled, and became passively resigned. We learned that role playing affects attitudes. According to the class textbook “When you adopt a new role—when you become a college student, marry, or begin a new job—you are mindful of the social prescriptions.” (Myers, 2014). Before the Stanford Prison experiment took place the guards and inmates were tested to be in great health condition. The guards in the Stanford experiment came into the experiment in their right mind. I find it…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Stanford Prison Experiment appeared to accomplish more damage than great to every one of the members who were included in the study. Outside of this study there have been arbitrary occasions that can be connected back to that study for the absence of morals, dehumanizing, and the absence of appreciation for others. Despite the fact that this study was grievous by all methods and exceptionally irritating that it could have even been permitted to be directed it improved principles, regulations and morals with regards to human members. Because of this study the IRB, APA, and the NBAC has made an awesome showing with securing the rights and morals for every human member who may get to be included in a…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ethical dilemmas in the Stanford experiment are certainly related to some of the questions raised regarding…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For decades, inmates in prison have taken part in medical research for both government testing and pharmaceutical drugs. At first what seemed to be a good idea, has recently been proven to not be as beneficial as once thought. Although many believe that testing on prisoners is a good idea, prisoners should not be used for experimentation due to the fact that prisoners are easily manipulated, along with poor physical and mental health.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics Eassy

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In turn, in the Milgram Obedience experiment, The following APA guidelines were broken by deception. Deception was involved; participants were informed that they were testing the effect of discipline on concentration when in fact they themselves were the ones being tested on to research obedience to authority. I feel as it was unnecessary to deceive the participants of the true purpose of the experiments because they could have taken a different approach. Many of the participants did not leave in the same state the entered the experiment and many left stressed. Breaking the APA guideline of protection to the participants was also unnecessary. By letting the participants think that they possibly killed someone was putting the participants’ mental health at risk. The participants had been abused and not enough was done to protect them from psychological damage. Another APA guideline that was broken was when they did not allow the participants to withdraw from the experiment when the participants wanted to. This could have enhanced the stress of the participants. In…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays