The blended approach in my opinion was the best one because it makes us look at all the factors. Not just the amount that it cost but how much people buy it and its popularity. I recognized popular companies. I checked their stock history and if it seemed as it had a chance on improving, according to the news or the kind of publicity they have been getting. For example, Wells Fargo, had becoming infamous. They were in the process of a lawsuit and if the other party won, Wells Fargo was going to lose money. Therefore Wells Fargo would not be a good investment because a good investment needs to bring a satisfying amount of profit. In the other hand, Disney, was a good choice for an investment. It was getting good publicity, so that made people want to buy it. This would raise the price of the stock which then, would bring profit to the buyer of the stock because they can now sell it for a high price. This would bring a good amount of …show more content…
This company sells wood for the construction of houses, buildings, bridges anything really. There was news that the government was going to build lots of new bridges, among other construction sites. This created the effect for people to buy stock from this company for it would be in a financial status. Since many investors would try to buy it, the price would increase. This company also pays 0.64% dividend which is a decent amount for a dividend. This company's stock sells will improve due to the fact that there's going to be lots of contractions in the near future. This information comes from the fact that the government made it known that they wanted to make new contractions. Since the company is going to be having lots of business, they might increase the dividends because of the money they will now have left over. When a company is having good business, the stock price goes up, which will benefit long term buyers. The amount of their profits depends on how many shares of stock they bought and for how much they bought if