The implication here is that these problems are able to cause the viewer’s attention to cast away or get bewildered. It might be said that the primitiveness is due to the fact that the medium of film was only in its birth stage. But the problem with this, in my view, is because of the state of art of silent films. Originally, the medium of movies was started out from the stage of the theatre, taking over its theatrical model and techniques. As any viewer could notice, actors display large dramatic movements and gestures to express their excitement, wonder, and dismay. Professor at UCLA, Peter Reiher agrees when he writes “Theater at the turn of the century was solidly melodramatic, with acting that would be laughed off the stage, today.” Indeed, those who watched the film can recognize several similarities between the film and the theatre plays, from the significantly expressive acting to static camera, and to staging of mise-en-scene. For instance, let’s just remember how the audience reacts when Dr. Caligari proudly presents his creation, somnambulist Cesare, at the village fair. Also, modern viewers, undoubtedly, do not find silent movies easy to watch. The complete numbness of sound in the scenes may cause inattention for film-goers who watches immensely immersible movies with blaring sound…