Congress passed a high protective tariff on imported, primarily manufactured goods. The south, being predominantly agricultural and reliant on the north and foreign countries for manufactured goods, saw this tariff as an affront to their economy (Wilson). Many southerners blamed their economic problems squarely on the tariff for raising the prices they had to pay for imported goods while their own income shrank. Vice President John C. Calhoun called it a “tariff of abominations” that was meant to favor the north and this tariff led him to pen his “South Carolina Exposition and Protest,” in which he argued that if a national majority acted against the the interest of a regional minority, then individual states could void—or nullify— federal law (Corbett). The theory of nullification, or the voiding of unwelcome federal laws, provided wealthy slaveholders, who were a minority in the United States, with an argument for resisting the national government if it acted contrary to their …show more content…
It also eventually became a factor in causing the southern states to nullify the Union itself, bringing about their secession and the creation of the Confederacy. Although the Compromise Tariff of 1833 was passed, which mollified the South Carolina legislature and caused them to withdraw the Ordinance of Nullification, unrest in the southern states continued, eventually leading to the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861. It also had a tremendous effect on the framers of the Confederate Constitution that they thought it was necessary to write into their Constitution a clause that forever settled the issue of protective tariffs within their new country. Unlike the Federal Constitution, which requires a supermajority of states to call for an amendment, the Confederate Constitution only requires three states to call for an amendment to be brought up before a national convention