Has madness really taken him over? Is he truly a madman? Whereas many might argue he is not, such as the defendant himself, it is undisputable that this man is insane. The narrator has been accused of murder and although it is undeniable that he has committed the crime, he is not guilty by reason of insanity. Punishing anyone in the situation of having a mental disorder or suffering from any other psychiatric illness would be unlawful. There is enough evidence to prove that the defendant was actually insane, such as the fact that he suffers from plural illnesses such as paranoia and monomania. Instead of punishing the defendant, sending him to an insane asylum would be of more relevance.
His paranoia is determining to his insanity. The defendant claimed to have heard the beating of the old man’s heart even after his death. Hearing the consistent heartbeat of the man growing louder, loud enough to be heard with the naked ear. As described, the heartbeat was not heard by any of the officers at the night of the crime and therefore must have been an illusion of the defendant. Not only did the defendant hear a heart beating, he also confessed to have heard voices from heaven, earth, and particularly from hell. The defendant suggests that the hearing of the nonexistent heartbeat is simply the over-acuteness of the sense. His continues denial of insanity is contrary to reality. Questioning himself to be mad is unmistakably a sign of insanity.
Hatred and resentment for the old man cannot be seen as a reason for the defendant to have killed him as the defendant himself has stated to have loved the old man and never has been wronged by him. Not venom for the old man but a rather extraordinary obsession for his eye is seen as the ultimate stimulation for the murder. The eye provoked a strong anxiety in the man, thinking that it is evil, which eventually led to the irrational decision of killing the man and therefore extinguish the eye.
Furthermore, the defendant can be considered insane by the fact that he is suffering from a mental illness called monomania, an illness detected whenever someone is obsessed with a single idea or type of idea. In the case of the defendant, he is obsessed with the idea of killing the man, or more specifically, the vulture eye. Eight nights in a row at midnight, the defendant pays the old man nightly visits with a lantern, only to watch the eye. No sane man would be able to sit still for so long only to watch an eye, letting his mind fill with the fear for the eye and desire of its absence.
All these factors conclude in the ascertainment of the insanity of the defendant. Sanity is no longer within this man. It would be highly unjust to punish this man, he cannot be found guilty. Only to let this man go to jail could be a crime.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Some believe that the narrator would be able to use the insanity defense do to the fact that he was constantly showing signs of mental illness’ and did not have proper intent. Throughout the story it became evident that the main character was suffering from schizophrenia and paranoia. The narrator was speaking about the old man’s eye comparing it to the eye of a vulture. Oddly enough it was only the man’s eye that bothered the narrator as he says so in this quote, “...and so it was impossible to do the work; for it was not the old man who vexed me, but his Evil Eye.” This is also the reason it took so long for the narrator to finally kill the old man. The man was paranoid and was constantly thinking things that are not true as well as imagining weird things. For example, “--I undid it just so much that a single thin ray fell upon the vulture eye” in this quote he is watching the old man in his bed which is not something sane people do. Also, the narrator did not have the intent of an average person like money or love, as he mentions in the beginning of the story when he states he wants none of the old man’s stuff or money. “Object there was none. Passion there was none.” This was his statement near the beginning of the story and shows that he had no real intentions except ridding himself of the evil eye. Although these are all good counter-arguments over all the sources are leaning more towards the fact that he was mentally capable of differentiating right from…
- 1400 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Introduction: The insanity defense has been used for many years and believed to began around the 1720’s where the first formal defense was used in a court in 1724. Judge Tracy, the judge that ruled over the first case coined a term “The wild beast standard” that states “for someone to be insane he must be totally deprived of his understanding and memory, and not know what he is doing anymore than an infant, a brute, or a wild beast” (Neville, 2010, pp.3-4). After the Daniel M’Naghten case, a man who attempted to kill a prime minister due to his belief that the prime minister was conspiring against him ended up killing the secretary, there was a new rule many states began to follow. After M’Naghten was found insane by multiple experts because he was unable to know the difference of right and wrong therefore he was acquitted of all charges (Neville, 2010, p. 5) a rule was developed labeled after M’Naghten.…
- 1049 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
With all the terrorism that has been happening around the world, it might remind you of the way the narrator of The Tell-Tale Heart goes insane and makes irrational actions. The short novel The Tell-Tale Heart written by Poe is one of his best works from all the stories that I have read that was written by him.…
- 999 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The suspect had a personality of pain and suffer , he wasn't considered normal he had experienced different issues. “ it was the beating of the old man's heart, It increased my fury,as the beating of a drum stimulates the soldier into courage”(92). This explains how he had some type of anxiety, or it relieved him if he did this . if he was sane he would have planned the death and he would have been prepared, What would you choose insane or sane?…
- 460 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Today you are here to decide whether the defendant presented is insane. This man was imprisoned for murdering his wife. This was after killing his first cat and aiming to kill his second. Why kill so many innocent lives? After hearing his significant story, many of you must be confused. You may believe he is indeed insane while others may think he pretending to be crazy in order to get out of his death penalty. My job here is to prove that he is faking it all. Therefore, he deserves to die for his horrible actions.…
- 494 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The author of this paper argues several reasons why the insanity plea should be changed or either eliminated. The reasons are considered and supported by evidence. The conclusion states that insanity should be altered or eliminated for the safety and well being of society.…
- 1668 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
In Edgar Allan Poe’s short tale, « the tell tale heart », his imagination, creativity and psychological complexity shines; however, the strength of the stories lies in the theme because the story is built up around it. This trademark interpretive form of fiction begins with a mentally ill narrator retelling a horrendous story, in first person narrative, of motiveless murder. The madness of the narrator is easily shown at the beginning, however the narrator believes that his disease has only heightened his senses, when he implies, “… have I not told you that what you mistake for madness is but over-acuteness of the sense (6)”. as the story progresses, the reader learns that the protaganist has hidden the victim and shortly after, the murder…
- 292 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
For starters, the expression, the courtroom definition, and the psychiatrist term of the word “insanity” are all different and all have different connotations. In order to be considered insane in today’s court, you have to be completely separated from reality. As described by Vaknin, “A perpetrator should go unpunished - and be hospitalized instead - only if he is found to be completely divorced from reality by diagnosticians from both sides, a far cry from today’s insanity defense” (2). To prove that a suspect is in fact separated from reality, a few things have to be proven. The first thing to be proven is if the suspect had a diminished capacity. Macbeth showed that he was mentally impaired when he brought the daggers back instead of putting them with the guards and smothering them with blood. Although he knew that he was killing, he was not stable enough to carry out the entire crime. After the first crime, he could not control his behavior anymore. It became out of hand and he wasn’t able to control it anymore. He felt the urge to kill; which proves that he had an irresistible impulse which could no longer be controlled. In a way, he also lacked criminal intent. While he intended to kill, he did it because he believed that killing the king was what he was meant to do.…
- 1290 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The problem with this defense is that insanity in this particular essay is either examined from a legal angle or a psychoanalytical one which involves talking to people and having them take tests. There is however, no scientific proof confirming the causal relationship between mental illness and criminal behavior based on a deeper neurological working of the brain sciences. The psychiatrist finds his/herself in a double bind where with no clear medical definition of mental illness they must answer questions of legal insanity beliefs of human rationality, and free will instead of basing it on more concrete scientific facts.…
- 787 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Without witnesses to a crime, the criminals could say he was insane at the time of the crime.…
- 1040 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
To this day, only five states deny the defendant of the use of insanity defense. The insanity defense has such a firm historical and moral origin that provide fairness to defendants who suffer from mental disorders. It is important that the government and the public to treat them with consideration; provide them with the treatment that suitable for the individual’s illness to make them better in hope of release them back into the community when they are no longer a threat to the public rather than to confine them in prison and let them…
- 1015 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the many issues that trouble the American Justice System today is that of the insanity defense. This defense has been brought in front of courts for years and has caused massive debate. The insanity defense plays a powerful role in our society which begs for justice. However some look upon it as a god sent, while other feel it is the enemy. ?The insanity defense is rooted in a basic principle of justice: that it is unfair to hold persons responsible for their actions when they don?t know, or cant control, what they are doing? (Worth 16), but is it true that people really don?t ?know? what they are doing; and if so should they still be punished for it? Many who share negative feelings towards the insanity defense believe that it is not a defense in the victims case but a defense to aid the perpetrator.…
- 845 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The narrator planned out the murder long before he did it. As he was about to explain how he completed his task, he sounded quite proud. He did make sure to point out that he is not mad and did what he thought was right. “If you still think me mad, you will think so no longer when I describe the wise precautions I took for the concealment of the body.” He remembered all of the things he did the night of the crime. Signs of a mental illness are memory loss. He must be sane if he could clearly state what happened without hesitation. The narrator does not seem one hundred percent trustworthy though. He could be seen as mental for this…
- 721 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…
- 970 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
He thought he heard his father’s heart beating, and he thought the officers heard it as well, but was just going along with it. He felt they knew what he did. It was his imagination that tripped him up.…
- 772 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays