Preview

THE TROLLEY PROBLEM

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
677 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
THE TROLLEY PROBLEM
The trolley problem presents a question of human perception of morality which presents two methods of killing in order to save lives. In the one problem, a trolley can be diverted with the turning of a switch, thus killing one but saving five, or to take direct physical action and push a large man onto the tracks, killing one, but saving five. In the responses which were given on the discussion board, I could not predict with truth what I would in reality do. To both responses, I wrote that it was likely that I would do nothing and allow the action to take place. Kant would likely argue that in this case we have the universal responsibility to not kill, with which I agree, and moreover I would not want the weight of anyone’s death on my mind and would also not be sure that flipping the switch or pushing a large individual would be the best solution.
Emmanuel Kant presented many views which are aligned with nature in principle: “the starry sky above and the moral law within" In Kant’s arguments, he urges that we are to act in ways that we treat one another, regardless of whom, “always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means." (Kant, 2011) has a deep and profound respect for nature and how it takes care of itself. According to his principles, Kant would likely argue that no action should be taken in diverting the train from its tracks because of our responsibility to each other to not kill, and that people should not use one another as a means to an end, even if to save lives. Killing is still a violation of universal law: as it violates the universal principles, even in the hopes that an action will solve or lessen pain, it would still be an act of self-defeat, because the negative energy in the act of killing would return upon one’s self. Using utilitarian ethics to solve the trolley problem – the principles are such that the balance of right and wrong are measured by the outcomes of an action. In the trolley problem the applicant in both

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    The contents of this paper will analyze the GM ignition case using several concepts taught in ethics. This will include a background of the issue as well as a detailed evaluation of the decision by GM from the utilitarianism and Kantian perspective. This will show that GM’s decision was morally wrong as well as prove that GM should be held morally responsible for their actions.…

    • 3185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Trolley Dilemma is a thought experiment where there is a runaway train and it is heading down the tracks towards five workers you cannot directly do anything to stop the train, but you happen to be standing by a lever that will switch the tracks, only problem is there one man on the other track. And by pulling the lever you will kill him only instead, so you kill one as an alternative to killing five. The other scenario is, imagine you are standing on a bridge seeing all of this happen and you by chance notice a very fat man standing on the bridge with you, he is leaning over the edge and you know that if you…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    By analyzing Bruers and Brackman’s paper, it is nearly clearly stated why one should expect a theory to accomplish this. It is only inferred that a theory should work in this way for applicability and determinacy. This would be a great virtue of a moral theory but for a current theory to obtain this virtue is unlikely based on clear differences in moral intuitions shown throughout the trolley cases. Both Kaufman and Bruers and Brackman’s works reference causal chains with the trolley variants. On analyzing Kaufman’s section of causal chains, Kaufman appears disorganized and slightly confused in his approach to explaining it. Even when referencing a moral professor Kaufman’s points were hard to decipher from his passage. Bruers and Brackman’s explanation is much more clear in explanation and use effective examples to illustrate. However, there are multiple situations in their works where confusion arises just like Kaufman’s. They say at one point in their use of causal chains, “It might be the case that the trolley is too fast and is able to kill all six people, because all six…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this classic piece written by Philippa Foot who discusses if it’s morally permissible between killing and letting die with a variety of different scenarios drawn out for analysis. I am going to talk about the scenario of Rescue 1 and its analysis of the permissibility according to Foot. I will also talk about the Rescue 2 case which has a twist to the analysis. The final analysis will be of Foot’s trolley case in which she explains “diverting” as a permissibility. Then the big test of my knowledge will come into play when I tackle the scenario of Jewish refugees whom escaped and whether its permissible to kill one to save them all from being captured.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    week 11

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page

    The reasoning that has allowed me to come up with this decision is based upon my own personal values that I have which is if there is something that I can do some way shape or form that will allow me to make a difference I am willing to do it especially if it is for the greater good to be helpful to someone else. By me just sitting by and watching the trolley car and letting them all die would be something that I would physically be able to do because of the heart that I have. Though I am not a killer I would still weigh the options between the two and come up with one person dying is better the all 5.…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    trolley problem

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this essay will be discussing the trolley problem devised by Philippa Foot, and exploring different aspects of utilitarianism in relation the situation. The trolley problem is as follows ‘A train is hurtling down a track and you see that it is going to hit a group of 5 people and will certainly kill them all. However you are standing on a bridge over the line next to a fat man and you are sure that if you pushed him onto the line his bulk would be sufficient to stop the train before it hit the group of people, would you push him?’.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion Test Reviews

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism – method of justifying acts “utilitarianism”. utilirianism is really a moral principle that holds that the morally right course of action in any situation is the one that produces the greatest balance of benefits, and pleasure in order to avoid pain for everyone affected.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Doing the Right Thing

    • 3356 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Suppose you are the driver of a trolley car hurtling down the track at sixty miles an hour. Up ahead you see ve workers standing on the track, tools in hand. You try to stop, but you can’t. The brakes don’t work.You feel desperate, because you know that if you crash into these ve workers, they will all die. (Let’s assume you know that for sure.) Suddenly, you notice a side track, o to the right. There is a worker on that track, too, but only one.You realize that you can turn the trolley car onto the side track, killing the one worker, but sparing the ve. What should you do? Most people would say, “Turn! Tragic though it is to kill one innocent person, it’s even worse to kill ve.” Sacri cing one life in order to save ve does seem the right thing to do. Now consider another version of the trolley story. This time, you are not the driver but an onlooker, standing on a bridge overlooking the track. (This time, there is no side track.) Down the track comes a trolley, and at the end of the track are ve workers. Once again, the brakes don’t work. The trolley is about to crash into the ve workers. You feel helpless to avert this disaster—until you notice, standing next to you on the bridge, a very heavy man. You could push him o the…

    • 3356 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory most often ascribed to the philosopher John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian theory suggests actions and/or intentions are not right or wrong; rather the morality of a choice or act is determined by the outcome or result. Utilitarian’s believe outcomes can be determined in advance of an action and the ethical choice is one which provides the best result or most happiness for the greatest number of individuals (e.g., pleasure, happiness, health, knowledge, satisfaction). The utility theory asserts morality is a means to some other end, it does not stand on its own as being intrinsically moral.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism says that the moral and ethical thing to do is that which provides the most happiness or the least unhappiness to society. Sitting in class listening to the lecture on the moral theory of Utilitarianism it first sounded like the best moral theory ever. However as the classes continued and we learned more and more about this theory my opinion quickly changed. In this paper I will defend the idea that Utilitarianism is a failed moral theory.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Intro Paper

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism is the approach to ethics that focus on choosing the act that has the best consequences (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). The utilitarian will view all the good and bad produced by the act (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). Utilitarian’s do not view the difference in chosen act based as moral issues. Acts are classified as morally right or wrong only if the action has consequences that have a result that has a preferred manner (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). Utilitarianism focuses on the act on the individual performing the action. Utilitarianism only addresses morality if the act is the preferred action but if not, morality does not play a role in basing decisions (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). Ethics is not viewed in utilitarianism as well because decisions are based on best outcome for the individual.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kitty Genovese

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Kitty Genovese story is a tragic one and is a controversial topic when ethics come into play. Though she screamed for help repeatedly while being stabbed the observers from the surrounding apartments did very little to assist the young woman. One observer in specific did shout “Leave the girl alone” and that deterred the assailant for a brief moment but whether or not he acted ethically is something of a different matter. According to Duty-Base Ethics which by definition states “the doctrine that actions are morally correct if they comply with existing obligations owed another and ourselves,” one could deduct that this observer did not act ethically because he did not serve the duty to Kitty Genovese to save her life as if roles were reversed it would be Kitty Genovese’s ethical duty to ensure the observer’s life was saved. This duty that Kitty Genovese did not receive is the very basic fundamental meaning of one’s life and how we each owe it to one another to try to preserve a fellow human beings life. This can also be translated at the Golden Rule which urges us to “do unto others as we would have them do unto us” which is the basis to Immanuel Kant’s ethical reasoning. If the observer had taken the Golden Rule into mind while deciding how to act while this innocent young woman is pleading for help the result could have been a story of heroism instead of tragedy. In order for the Golden Rule to be successful in influencing our ethical behaviors one must place themselves in the situation they are witnessing, contemplate how one would feel in that person’s shoes and struggle and suffering. Obviously this observer was not moved by the Golden Rule and thus did not act ethically according to the Kantian ethical approach.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We never have permission to break a rule so when we are faced with situations in which we must choose the lesser evil, Kant's philosophy makes it impossible to make the less negative choice because we still wouldn't want it to be a universal rule. Therefore, this absolutism makes it impossible to address these moral…

    • 56 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gone Baby Gone Essay

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This action by Patrick Kenzie corresponds to the first premise of Kant’s moral philosophy which holds that an individual act morally if his or her conduct without condition would be opted by another person in a similar circumstance. This declaration rests on the fact that if it were another person in the same…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics