He has not been seen since the attempt to build a signal fire went terribly wrong and set one side of the mountain, the side on which the boy had been playing, on fire. Evidence of the boy’s absence is seen when Piggy says, “That little ‘un had a mark on his – face – where is – he now? I tell you I don’t see him,” (Golding 47). Piggy, being the most intelligent person on the island, is the first to realize that this boy is missing and likely knows that he is dead. But he is trying to avoid the thought of death as much as possible, as they have just arrived on the island. After this incident the avoidance of this topic is apparent, although the narrator mentions the boy one more time. The narrator is talking about Henry when he says, “He was alst6o a distant relative of that other boy whose mulberry marked face had not been seen since the evening of the great fire,” (62). Although Henry is related he is too young to understand that the boy is ceased. The narrator mentions the dead boy, but no one on the island will talk about the truth and therefore avoid …show more content…
Although they may know the truth, they choose to deny it for their own wellbeing. They deny what happened to the mulberry marked boy to avoid feeling guilty. Similarly, when Simon is murdered, they attempt to avoid the topic to keep away from feeling responsible for his death, although all the boys on the island took part in his death. Piggy is a representation of truth and knowledge, this is the reason why he is not well accepted by any of the boys on the island. Golding used the theme of denial very cleverly. This theme is very important to the structure of the novel, without this theme the outcome of this writing would have greatly differed and would have caused many changes throughout the