In Kinkley’s article, he notes the most remarkable element in Jin’s book is the “absurd impasses”— the main character, Lin, waited eighteen years for his unilateral divorce. Kinkley adds that, the waiting scenario becomes “the grounds” of the entire book (¶2); it is “unpretentious” and “offers feminist sympathies” (¶5). In Jin’s book, Shuyu, the traditionalism in the feudal society, had her ill-fated destiny waiting for her man, Lin, her entire life. Manna, the modernism in the Maoist society, had her dully “platonic love” with Lin for two decades. Yet the waiting scenario never seemed to end. Lin concluded Manna was “a goner.” He cried for Shuyu’s forgiveness; Poured out of sympathies, Shuyu told Lin that she would be always waiting for him …show more content…
In Jin’s book, Lin’s wife, Shuyu, suffered two decades for Lin and Manna’s affair. Shuyu’s martial agony deeply reflected the sadness of those countrywomen in the feudal society of China. Shuyu was raised to be obedient in all aspects. Her bound feet feature was the great symbolization of feudalism in China. Nurses sneered at Shuyu’s bound feet when she visited the hospital in the city; however, she did not feel ashamed of her difference. She frankly informed those nurses that bound-feet custom was called “Golden Lotus,” and her bound feet were “like a treasure” (206). Although Shuyu was proud of her bound feet, she never knew that this feudal custom was one of the major reasons her husband disliked her and spent eighteen years to divorce