Preview

The Unseen Impacts Of Protest Movement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1051 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Unseen Impacts Of Protest Movement
The Unseen Impacts of Protest Movements Protests since the early 20th century have come to show great significance throughout our society by bringing people together and uniting their voices as a whole. Recent protests have been some of the largest in history and still play a huge culminating role in the public eye by expressing the nonconformity views of the protesters. The fear for claiming apprehension on policies and social trends worn on their faces as they struggle for their voices to be heard. While a percentage of their goals were in the end met, a great number were confronted with a negative result. Protest movements express grievances and initiate social reforms through the use of flaws and strengths. For many years, social protests …show more content…
The early 1960s showed a great contrast between two powerful civil right leaders, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. King works prominently were based on nonviolence, at the same time Malcolm X was all about force and fights to win what was needed for equality. In order to understand the issue at hand, protesters have to put their perspectives aside and look at both the benefits and ill effects for protest movements. In many cases, these movements have shown negative end results. First and foremost, protesters see many uprisings occur almost every single week, but it is good to still see people unite and outcry on matters that they feel are not being fairly treated. The issue becomes that excessively unfocused disturbances can make a group of protesters lose track of what they’re really fighting …show more content…
Less protests with better organization would double the effectiveness resulting in a better outcome. When protests happen as much as they currently are, the meaning is taken away because it often becomes the trend without the passion behind the cause. This is what makes noise, non-audible voices chanting together nonsense words from incoherent minds. "Designed to provoke, wreak havoc, and create chaos… They want the Internet to be flooded with images of police officers pepper spraying them, running them over with scooters, kicking, punching, dragging and beating them up" (“Protest Movements”). Chaos is what they get when things don’t start going the direction they had anticipated, the gatherings in the public areas start to rapidly diminish and the ones left behind are left with rage and anger and forget what a peaceful movement is really about. They want to bring awareness, but the nightmare occurs when they try to shove it down the other’s throats. In addition to only showing a biased example through social media to get more supporters, targeting the ones who are not aware of the current situations in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case of Charles Perkins, his methods worked great even though it may have been a rough start with negative backlash from the townspeople but with the assistance of the media he flipped it and in his own words from his autobiography, A Bastard Like Me, “ It brought, I think, to a lot of people, a confrontation with race relations in a very uncomfortable kind of way”. While on the other hand Martin Luther King’s philosophy of a non-violent protest did similarly and brought forth to light the issues which made the nation of America recognise the segregation occurring within their country. Through this recognition, even though his non-violent methods were being questions, King’s determination brought forth the civil rights act of 1964 and moreover the voting rights acts of 1965. Ergo, the two activists were similar in the fact that they were both non-violent and forced their countries to notice the issues happening beneath them and also especially cause action to be brought down through the voice of the…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King’s leadership resulted in one of the the greatest non-violent mass protests in the history of the western world. King represented a sense of hope and promise to the followers of the Civil Rights Movement. The most important aspect to understand in this debate is King’s non-violence. With many other African-American leaders, such as Malcolm X, taking a more aggressive, violent approach to change, King saw the potential in Ghandi’s peaceful protests. As Fairclough writes, “Few blacks believed that the city’s businessmen would have accepted desegregation but for the double pressure of the demonstrations and the economic boycott of downtown stores” (209). The only effective events in the Civil Rights movements were those that followed King’s system of non-violence. While Carson argues that rather than King’s presence, “the success of the black movement required the mobilization of black communities…”(219), this assertion is made under the assumption that a non-violent leader would organize the masses. Without King’s leadership, there may have been an violent uprising that only led to more tensions between the…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 28, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. spoke out against racism during the Civil Rights movement in order to fight for equal rights for every race and end discrimination against African Americans. During the African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954-1968), there were many acts of civil disobedience, which led to violence and even deaths of the protesters. There were also many nonviolent protests, such as sit-ins, marches, and speeches, to get people’s attention so that their voices would be heard and their desires fulfilled. Martin Luther King believed in the nonviolent approach to gain the rights he desired because in his opinion, it was the most powerful weapon against any enemy. In the midst of a nonviolent protest on August 28th, The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. makes a very memorable rhetorical appeal in front of millions of people for an end to discrimination against blacks and segregation of people with different skin tones.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the movement was triggered by a series of random sit-ins, the civil rights leaders and the youths were able to strategize using nonviolence as a method of exposing the truth about segregation. By reacting peacefully to the violence they faced by the angry mob, people were moved to call for an end against racial…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the effectiveness of protesting depends on the topic or situation being discussed at that time and place also if it has been administered before.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cesar Chavez Ethos Essay

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated in 1968, there were many calls for violent retaliation by the members of the civil rights movement. However, in an article written for a religious magazine ten years later, Cesar Chavez, a prominent labor union organizer and civil rights leader, urges society to utilize nonviolent protest as an alternative to violence. Chavez alludes to historical events, appeals to the reader’s sense of Ethos, and uses contrasting diction and juxtaposition when outlining the positive effects of nonviolence and the negative effects of violence in order to convince the reader that nonviolence is the superior method of protest.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Uc Berkley Case Analysis

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This current problem is actually bigger than it seems. According to the text, these demonstrations are in response to different facets of capitalism’s attack on the working class. The reasons demonstrations like this aren’t successful is because there isn’t enough unity. For a successful change to occur the assistance of undergraduate students, teaching assistants, lecturers, faculty, service workers and staff need to begin to meet towards a common goal. For success, dense networks…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The definition of a protest is a statement or an action that expresses disapproval or objection of something. Of the three that we went over in class; Socrates, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X, the one whose position is the most effective in protesting and showing that he does not approve of the current way of living, is Malcolm X. Malcolm X has a no nonsense attitude about what to do with an unjust law or situation. He uses the “any means necessary” approach to the situation where he believes that you not only can, but also must do anything and everything you can possibly do to get what you need as opposed to the other means of protesting from Socrates, persuasion, and Dr. King, non-violent direct action. The views from each of these…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1968, close to 50 years ago, Martin Luther King, Jr. was killed by an assassin's bullet. He had given us a decade of nonviolent protest and civil disobedience during the civil rights movement of the 1950’s. While the idea of nonviolent protest was still relatively new, MLK hadn’t invented it; he had been one of a few who pioneered the idea and made it popular. The theory of civil disobedience can be traced back to an essay by Henry David Thoreau by the same name. This theory was adopted and popularized by Leo Tolstoy, Mahatma Gandhi, and eventually, Martin Luther King, Jr.. In “Civil Disobedience,” Thoreau said that if a law “requires you to be the agent of injustice to another,” you should break that law, rather than be unjust to another person.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas peaceful protest weakens the citizenry, violent protest forms it into savagery. There is a stark difference between strength and animalistic savagery. Just as being weak weakens society, so too does savagery. Savagery weakens society by corroding the moral and cultural bedrock of it. By protesting with violence, society is broken down into just another tribal organization of non-thinking members. By refusing to reason, intellectual progress and that which this great society was based on, a factual and intellectual discourse between reasonable people, is only a memory, a marginal thing of antiquity. When discourse and logic fall, so too does society. This is evident throughout time, and will continue to be evident. Strong, intelligent societies survive and the weak societies…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the main reasons these protests were so significant was because children were demonstrating and they were met with extreme violence. Children as young as 6 years old were faced with fire hoses and attacked by police dogs. Fragile and innocent six-year-olds were so severely…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Great Man Theory

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most successful movements that didn’t involve Martin Luther King Jr was the sit-in movement (Gordon, 2000). The sit-in movement was formed in February of 1960 in Greensboro, North Carolina when four African-American college students sat down at a Woolworth’s lunch counter to purchase food, they were refused service but did not leave the store until it’s closing (Cozzens 1998). The first sit-in had little to no effect, it wasn’t until the next day when the number of students sitting in diners began to grow and continue to grow, gaining more publicity and the attention of local civil rights organisation (The Reader’s Companion to American History, N/A). The word began to spread the word about this upcoming movement with people like Gordon Cary, a Congress of Racial Equality representative became involved in organising broader sit-ins. The sit-in movement continued to grow within eleven cities across America and the sit-in organisers formed a new organisation called the Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). The sit-in movement was successful in their protests and on May the 10th 1960, several diners in Nashville, Tennessee started serving black customers. After this victory, the movement forged ahead and became fighting for integration in public facilities such as movie theatres.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Civil disobedience is a form of protest in which protesters deliberately violate a law” (suber). It is a way for society to reform itself to reflect its current values while maintaining its fundamental ideals. Some may argue civil disobedience is a “slippery slope” leading to anarchy or it cannot be justified in a democracy. Civil disobedience, while not optimum, is a way to accomplish change with the intent of reform and stabilizing communities.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Movement Analysis

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are two different perspectives that represent the consequences and tactical choices in the world of social movements, those two perspectives are: “resource mobilization” and “political process.” Both of these perspectives tend to have a limited focus and put most of their attention on tactics. This is limiting because they do not focus on their opponents. “Resource mobilization” (RM) and “Political Process” (PP) have big differences between them as well; the biggest difference between these is their beliefs on potential power of the social movements. Barkan has three different reasons for writing this article, the first being; he wants to show the importance of studying tactics of movements involving social movements that are of access…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Violent methods of protest were increasingly embraced by African Americans in the Civil Rights movement during the 1950s to 1960s because of frustration caused by the time consuming and ineffectiveness of peaceful non-violence. After the initial hype of non-violence during the 1955 Montgomery Bus Boycotts, non-violence eventually lost its influence as it was not yielding the results the African-Americans had hoped for. In addition to this, non-violence was met with police brutality and violence, making it dangerous to be involved in Civil Rights Movements and discouraging the participation in non-violence. Consequently, violent methods were seized by African Americans as they attracted widespread attention and were more effective in achieving short term goals, especially as violence was advocated strongly by figure heads such as Malcolm X and the Black Panthers.…

    • 718 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays