Animal Testing
Animal testing has benefited human health. People do not contract polio anymore because of a vaccine tested on animals. Advances in antibiotics, insulin, and other drugs have been made possible through research done on animals. Animal testing should continue to benefit medical research. In order for scientists to create new drugs, they have to be able to test them. Scientists have found that many animals have similar physical processes to humans. Watching how a new drug affects an animal makes it possible to find out how new drugs might affect the human body. The cost of animal testing makes it an affordable option. Laboratory animals are in abundance. It is easy to breed rats and other animals and to keep them in labs. Animal testing saves human lives. It would be wrong to test new drugs on humans. How many people would die because doctors could not administer medication before compiling all the information about a new drug? When surveyed, 99% of all active doctors in the United States stated that animal research has paved the way to many medical advancements. An impressive 97% of doctors support the continuous use of animals for research. Animal testing should be continued for medical research. It provides a safe method for drug testing that is inexpensive and easy to maintain. Doctors endorse the usage of animals for testing. It is possible that the cure for AIDS could come about through animal testing.
Argumentative Essay:
Animal Testing
Medical research involving animals has dramatically improved the health of the human race. Without animal testing, the cure for polio would not exist and diabetics would suffer or die from their disease. Despite these benefits, some people believe that animals should be not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. This essay will outline the advantages of animal testing. Animal testing allows scientists to test and create new drugs. Animals such as monkeys or rabbits have similar physical processes to humans. This allows scientists to test the effects of certain drugs. If a drug produces adverse effects in animals, it is probably unfit for human use. Animal testing is cheap. There is a large supply of animals for medical research. Animals are easily bred and maintained safely in controlled labs. The costs of testing on humans would be extremely high. Many people argue that animal testing is cruel. In some cases, this is true. However, it would be much more cruel to test new drugs on people or children, or to let people die because there was not enough information about a drug. Furthermore, legislation in most countries sets standards for animal treatment, and laboratories have guidelines to prevent cruelty. Opponents of animal research also say that information from animals does not apply to humans. They point to certain commercial drugs, which have been withdrawn because of side effects in humans. While it is true that animal systems differ from human systems, there are enough similarities to apply information from animals to humans. Animal rights campaigners claim that we don’t need new tests because we already have vast amounts of information. However, many new deadly infections appear every year and new treatments and drugs are needed to combat these deadly plagues. Animal testing is needed in the world we live in. Our responsibility is to manage the animals in our care and balance their suffering against the good that comes from them.
Color Key
= Claim (my side, the “right” side) = Counterclaim (the “other” side, the “wrong” side.
2011 Smekens Education Solutions, Inc. www.SmekensEducation.com
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Scientists are constantly looking for new medical advances that they hope will save people’s lives and often turn to animals as the optimal resource for testing new ideas and products. These animals range from rats and mice to dogs and monkeys. On top of varying animals, the tests they run fluctuate from simply checking the effectiveness of a medicine already in use to testing an entirely new form of treatment. However, there have beens years of controversy over the morality of using animals as the test subjects.…
- 1042 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1804, President Thomas Jefferson sent an expedition to explore land obtained through the Louisiana Purchase. The group sent was called the Corps of Discovery, unearthing miles of land and discovering what they held. Ecologically, Lewis and Clark made countless discoveries regarding the flora and fauna of the land. Geographically, they were revolutionary in mapping and journaling. Socially, the expeditions of Lewis and Clark's interactions with the Native Americans greatly impacted the success of their journey. The Corps of Discovery, led by Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, was revolutionary in increasing America's ecological, geographic, and social knowledge and understanding of the environment and who and what inhabited it.…
- 1994 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Even though animals are not like exactly like us, we can test them and see how they react to the drug. People say that animal testing come with a result that are not applicable to humans. That may be true but how else are we suppose to find a way for a cure? Test it on kids? There are anti-animal testing people who want to use an alternative method of testing. Computer models are not advanced enough and testing on plants is less applicable to humans then tests that are used on animals such as monkeys. Until we have a better system we need to have the use animal testing. What would you like to see less of a normal dog just sitting being lazy or a sick diseased person? Obvious pick is that we would not like to see a person in pain or suffering. In an article about pro-testing on animals it mentions all the cures, treatments, and preventions that have been found by using animal testing. The article states, “ But animal research hasn't benefited humans alone. Animals also have improved healthcare and a longer lifespan. Farm animals, household pets, wild species and endangered species are all benefiting from the research conducted through animals. There are vaccines for rabies, distemper, tetanus, parvo virus and numerous other illnesses in cats, dogs and countless other domesticated animals. It's obvious that animal research benefits all living species and that we are all able to live longer, healthier, happier lives because of it.” This quotes just proves that testing on animals helps both humans and animals. If testing wasn’t allowed how else would we advance to the future? Before people would think that animal testing didn’t help the animal all it did was make the animal suffer and feel pain. Those people don’t have the right information to be saying that because with Pro-test.org they have the accurate information. Another reason why animals can never be on the…
- 1258 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Animal Testing is so painful for animals and they don't understand why they're being put through this pain. It is also very inhumane and morally offensive. Animal testing is cruel and an inhumane way to torture animals for mankind's own benefit. There have been millions of animals that have suffered a vicious, painful death in the name of research. Lastly there are alternatives to Animal Testing such as computer modeling, As science continues to transform our world beyond what we know, and technology continues to transform and expand upon what we depend on. Medical research and testing will also transition to embrace and…
- 133 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The major pro for animal testing is that it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many Medical Treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more. It is for this reason that animal testing is considered vital for improving human health and it is also why the scientific community and many members of the public support its use. In fact, there are also individuals who are against animal testing for cosmetics but still support Animal Testing for medicine and the development of new drugs for disease.…
- 578 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether it helps researchers to find new drugs and treatments suitable for humans. Whereas some are convinced that it does help researchers find new drugs and treatments, others maintain that some drugs tested on animals may never actually be useful or even safe for human consumption. In my own view the results of animals testing are unreliable because animals and humans are not genetically or anatomically alike to one another.…
- 566 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
On the other hand it can quite helpful in finding new cures without human trials. This possibly saving human lives is why I think that they do the animal testing first. I know it may sound a little harsh but would you rather risk a special bred mouse for the experiment, or yourself? That is the main focus of my paper today is to bring to your attention the pros and cons of the animal testing going on today. That is the whole principle of animal testing is to reduce human suffering, so we can live today to get to tomorrow. So maybe we can find the cure for cancer or aids with animal testing doing no harm to the human race. So therefore both sides of the argument have very good statements, so we will have to differ between them to see which one is…
- 382 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Animal testing is a cruel and ineffective medical practice that produces unreliable results that should be illegal and those laboratories should use safer alternatives that will provide more accurate results.…
- 955 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Animal testing has always been a dispute between people; some people think it’s morally wrong and some people think it helps with medical and scientific breakthroughs. Drugs that people use or cosmetics that are used could have been tested through animals before being stocked on shelves. About 800 animals are tested on before a drug is passed to clinical trials (“Is animal”). Many animals get tested on, but many like mice, rabbits, hamsters, monkeys, dogs, cats, pigs, and some other animals get tested on. Animals can be used to find new advances in medical treatment and check safety for products, but these animals that get tested on can go through pain and death. Animal testing is wrong and should be stopped because…
- 749 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One compelling reason to put a stop to animal testing is it’s unreliable. In fact a drug tested safe on animals was released and turned out to be toxic.Surely if we are relying on animal testing to cure diseases, it should be almost 100% accurate so children or adults who end up taking that drug to help them with their illness don’t end up dead.Also animal and human systems are quite different, penicillin is toxic to guinea pigs.Penicillin a drug, we use is toxic to guinea pigs an animal that could have prevented this drug from coming out because a guinea pig could have tested it and clearly the animal would have a negative reaction.One final example is 92% of drugs approved for testing in human trials fails to be approved for human use.Clearly animal testing is unreliable.…
- 529 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
We definitely need animal testing. The first reason we need it is because it is the law to test on animals before they can be used on humans. We also need it to make sure humans are given safe dosages of drugs, and enough so it will actually help the patient. Patients are also more likely to use certain drugs if it has been tested on animals. They feel more safe using…
- 963 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Others might say that animal testing is good because we can find cures for some of the terrible diseases that live here. It is more true that only 2% of the cures actually works. Also, that 2% has a chance to hurt people also. But it is true that some of the cures such as, lung cancer, birth defects, and spinal cord injuries. But if you are going to do animal testing and let it continue you should use more common animals such as rats, mice, and maybe ducks but not monkeys and other more endangered…
- 537 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In today’s society, many people debate whether or not using animals in research is humane. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. [2] Proponents of animal testing state that it has enabled the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, while opponents state that animal testing is cruel and often yields irrelevant results because animals are so different from human beings. Many different animals are used in scientific studies such as rabbits, mice, primates, dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it provides opportunities to improve the lives of both humans and animals.…
- 587 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Have you ever wondered what animal testing has helped us accomplished? Also, what it has done to our lives? I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it allows us to test medications before they are given to people and has helped us uncover other important things.…
- 496 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Silvia Garrido Ramirez Nº 5597 Master subject: Product &Service Management Professor: Jo ão Pereira 1…
- 3916 Words
- 16 Pages
Best Essays