Preview

The Use Of Marc Antony In Act 3 Scene 2 Of Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
417 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Use Of Marc Antony In Act 3 Scene 2 Of Julius Caesar
Marc Antony in Act 3 Scene 2 of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare has a tough time to convince the Romans that what the conspirators did was wrong because of Brutus’s speech. However, Marc Antony uses a 3 step plan to gradually turn the crowd against the conspirators. Marc Antony is able to turn the crowd against the conspirators by using an effective use of language and persuasion.
In the first part of Marc Antony’s oration he focuses on gaining the crowds trust as soon as he begins speaking to them. Marc Antony first addresses the crowd in a soft, meek way as though he is just one of them and is no higher and feels pain for the death of Caesar. “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears; I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.”
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Logos, Pathos, And Ethos In Julius Caesar
    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Logos, Pathos, And Ethos In Julius Caesar

    In, Act III Shakespeare pits Mark Antony’s famous rhetorical speech, “Friends, Romans, and Countrymen” against Brutus’ “Romans, Countrymen, and Lovers”. The play is driven by Persuasion. Cassius convinces Brutus that Caesar must die, setting the…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Paul Gee Literacy
    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page

    James Paul Gee Literacy

    In his essay “What is Literacy?” author and linguist James Paul Gee informs us of his definition of literacy by breaking it down for us and giving us examples that we personally encounter on a day to day basis. Gee tries to gives us a better understanding of the way that we as people behave when it comes to talking and interacting with different people.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar's Funeral Rhetorical Analysis
    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar's Funeral Rhetorical Analysis

    In the eulogy at Caesar’s funeral, Marc Antony, close friend of Caesar and general, seems to claim that he believes that Marcus Brutus and the rest of the men involved with the death of Caesar are honorable men, but in actuality believes that Caesar was the only honorable man in the Senate who was always there for his country and brought prosperity to his country. He also claims to not want to get revenge on the murderers of Caesar, but in reality, the whole point of his speech was to turn the citizens of Rome against Brutus so that Caesar’s death will be avenged. He develops this claim by first creating ethos and pathos refuting Brutus’ excuse that Caesar was ambitious. Then, he emphasizes the grand betrayal of Brutus towards Caesar. Towards…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony Rhetorical Analysis
    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mark Antony Rhetorical Analysis

    Mark Antony deftly speaks to his audience in a way that requires them to challenge their preconceived characterizations of Brutus and Cassius. He intentionally expresses the deliberate opposite of what he genuinely wishes and excessively compliments the people to the point that they forget their own seemingly unwavering convictions. His finesse and dexterity in bending words and minds ultimately works to his favor. Antony accomplishes his initial goal to convince the Roman people to revenge Caesar’s demise. This achievement in and of itself exhibits…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis of Antony s Eulogy
    • 369 Words
    • 1 Page

    Rhetorical Analysis of Antony s Eulogy

    After Caesars death Antony requested to speak at his funeral. Antony was a very good friend of Caesar. In his eulogy, Antony denies accusations of Caesar being “too ambitious” and retorts with examples of how good of a man he really was in his eyes. Antony firmly believes Caesar was innocent and that his murder cannot be justified. He speaks to the Plebeians, the Roman people…

    • 369 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antony's Speech In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antony's Speech In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

    “Et tu Brute?” words came out Caesar’s mouth like a slap to the face. Brutus knew in his heart right then and there that things were going to go down hill. As soon as Antony heard what had happened at the capital, he knew that what he said in his speech would be to his advantage. The play written by early english playwright, William Shakespeare, is about the tragic death of Julius Caesar. It takes place in Rome, and tells the historical story of how Caesar was brutally murdered, and the terrible fate of the conspirators who killed him. At Caesar’s funeral, Antony presents a speech to the crowd, as well did Brutus. Antony, though, had the most effective speech, by using important literary techniques, such as pathos, ethos, and strategic word choice, William Shakespeare, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.”…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mark Antony's Use of Rhetorical Appeals
    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mark Antony's Use of Rhetorical Appeals

    Initially, Antony uses Ethos to establish himself as a trusted and loyal figure to gain respect and trust of the plebeians. To gain the citizens’ attention, Antony begins Caesar’s funeral speech by reassuring them that he only “[came] to bury Caesar, not [to praise] him” (3.2.83). By only intending to bury Caesar, Antony convinces the audience to listen to his words because they are spoken with bitterness toward Caesar. With Antony in agreement with their newly instilled anger, the plebeians begin to trust Antony’s words even though his bitterness was not…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Figurative Language In Julius Caesar
    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Figurative Language In Julius Caesar

    In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony makes a speech to the people of Rome after Brutus spoke out about killing Caesar with the conspirators. Through Marc Antony’s speech, Shakespeare uses language techniques such as irony, repetition/tone, and figurative language to illuminate conflict between the citizens of Rome and…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Persuasive Speech
    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar Persuasive Speech

    “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!” (Reference to other speech) I, Marc Anthony, Caesar’s right hand man have come to you today to speak about a problem facing the community of Rome. Sadly, Caesar, our glorious leader, has gone up to the gods. In result of this we need a new leader before our city descends into chaos and destruction. I can help to return peace and overflowing prosperity to the city of Rome and Italy. As you all know Caesar died prematurely to the bloody hands of conspirators who have infiltrated what we call home. I saw Caesar die at the hands of such traitors, so these conspirators must be killed in vengeance. Without these conspirators stopped, our beloved city will be unable to continue on its gracious path.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Devices Julius Caesar
    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Devices Julius Caesar

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Brutus Ethos In Julius Caesar
    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus Ethos In Julius Caesar

    “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” This is a famous quote from Brutus regarding Julius Caesar. Brutus was manipulated by the conspirators into killing his best friend Caesar. From his guilt, Brutus ends up killing himself. But before his own death, Brutus and Caesar’s friend, Antony, give a speech regarding the death of Caesar. Brutus’s funeral speech in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare was most effective due to his use of pathos, ethos, and logos.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony proves himself to be the most effective manipulator. This feat was the product of many factors that Antony both took into account, and employed to a greater effect than his counterparts. Using the illustrative Rhetorical Triangle of Aristotle, Antony was able to convey the three main ingredients of good rhetoric to convince the Roman mob to turn upon the conspirators, mere moments after being told by Brutus that they had acted with “honor”. Using Logos, Antony’s logical argument that Caesar was not ambitious made the mob begin to doubt their current suppositions that Caesar deserved death for his ambition. With the emotive appeals of…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis

    The rhetorical device Antony took hold of throughout his persuasive argument is verbal irony. The use of verbal irony in his speech is so strong that it borders on sarcasm. "Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears/I come to bury Ceasar, not to praise him." (3.2.81-82) says Antony when introducing himself to the crowd. The use of verbal irony is exemplified in this quote with the use of “Friend” He addresses the plebeians as "Friends" with the purpose of persuading them into believing that they were equal, and that he just wanted to say farewell Caesar, even though there is a clear distinction between Antony and the Plebeians. As his speech develops, Antony begins to plant the seed of doubt and anger in the Plebeians’ hearts towards the conspirators. "The noble Brutus/ hath told you Caesar was ambitious,/If it were so, it was a grievous fault, /And grievously hath Caesar answered it,/ Here, under the leave of Brutus and the rest-/ For Brutus is an honorable man,/ So are they all are honorable men" (2.3.84-91) Antony starts off his speech agreeing to not demize the conspirators. However, it is clear to the reader that Antony does everything in his power to show they were not honorable men without saying they were dishonest.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Samuel Morse Research Paper
    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Samuel Morse Research Paper

    In Charlestown, Massachusetts a young boy was born on April 27th, 1791. His parents were Calvinist Pastor Jedidiah Morse (1761-1826) and Elizabeth Ann Breese (1776-1828). This young lad would soon be known to the world as Samuel Morse. He would later be known as a painter and for creating the electric telegraph, along with a unified language that would reach all four corners of the world.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    abcd
    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages

    abcd

    Market milk and market cream utilize about 35 to 40 percent of the milk produced in the united states.the remainder is used in the manufacture of swuch dairy p[roducts such as butter,cheese,conde3nsed milk,dry milk and ice cream.a relatively small quantity is used in the feeding of farm animals,principally the dairy calves.in the separation of milk for market cream and in the manufacture of butter and cheese there become available laege quantities of skim milk,buttermilk and whey.these three products are the byproducts of dairy industry.There are indication that these practice will not continue iondefinitely.in the future the use of dairy by products for human food is certain to increase.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics