Preview

The usefulness of Labelling within Crime and Deviance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1579 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The usefulness of Labelling within Crime and Deviance
Usefulness of Labelling C&D
Labelling theory and its theorists focus on the groups and/or individuals who were deemed to be criminal and labelled thus by society. Labelling theorists studied the various interactions between the ‘criminal' groups and individuals and the conformist society. Labelling theory was quite popular in the 1960s and early 1970s, but then fell into decline—partly as a result of the mixed results of empirical research. This essay will go on to show the origins of labelling theory, the theory itself and will show its strengths and weaknesses using various case-studies and examples.
Tannenbaum (1938) is widely regarded as the first labelling theorist. His main concept was the ‘dramatization of evil'. He stated that if a person is described as being a criminal then he automatically becomes one. Erwin Lamert (1951) founded the “societal Reaction” theory. This theory is widely credited to be the forerunner of the present day labelling theory. His theory basically states that a person experiences social deviance in two phases. The first phase is known as the Primary deviance phase. The second is known as the Secondary deviance phase. According to Lemert, the primary deviance phase begins with a criminal act. He or she is then labelled criminal but has yet to accept the label. The main point of view is whether he or she has accepted the criminal label. If the person views themselves as a criminal then the secondary deviant phase has begun. The object of whether a person views himself or herself as a criminal is what differentiates between the primary and secondary deviant phases. Lemert states that there are exceptions and people continue to stay in the primary phase, an example would be someone who rationalizes that the so called ‘criminal' act is legal as it is necessary for them to survive and earn money (an exotic dancer would be an example). The secondary deviance phase usually begins when a person has accepted the ‘criminal' label. They

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When studying crime and deviance, in particular the causes of crime, it is often useful to look at the reasons behind why people commit crimes in the first place. For interactionists, crime and deviance is a product of labelling. They believe that when a crime is committed, it is because a public application of a negative description of a powerless individual has occurred and that is the reason why a crime has been committed by that individual. Labelling is deterministic of your future life. Interactionists reject official statistics on crime, seeing them as little more than a social construction. They maintain that they vastly underestimate the extent of crime and do not present an accurate picture of crime in society.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the view that crime and deviance are the product of using labelling processes (21 marks)…

    • 810 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociologists would define labelling as a process of attaching a definition or meaning to an individual or group. For example, police officers may label a youth a “trouble maker”. Agents of social control define an individual which leads to a person being labelled by those who have the power to make the label stick and therefore the individual is seen as a deviant. In his essay I will look at the work of Howard Becker, Jock young and Edwin M. Lemert who look at the effects of the labelling theory on individuals and their contributions on how an individual becomes a deviant.…

    • 916 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    howard beckers theroy

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Howard Becker’s labeling theory starts off by identifying the deviant. Once you get caught doing something, you are identified and labeled for it; it can either be formal as labeled under the law or informal as in labeled with in family and friends. For example, I had two very good friends in high school, Serafin and Brian. They were best buds and always did everything together. Like many teenagers in high school they started to experiment with drugs. Like every other day they would both go smoke weed and get high in the alley afterschool. No one ever walked through the alley unless you were doing drugs or something but that day the police were roaming around the block because a robber had broke into someone’s house, Serafin and Brian happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. The cops drove through the alley and had seen both of them smoking, their first reaction was to run but where? When there wasn’t anywhere to run, it was a dead end. So they quickly jumped tried to jump the fence while Brian jumped the fence successfully and got to runaway, Serafin wasn’t so fortunate and ended up getting his pants stuck to the fence. As soon as Serafin got arrested he was immediately identified and labeled. As for Brian he didn’t get caught and never got labeled even though he was there and performing the same deviant actions as Serafin.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labelling theorists are concerned with how and why certain people and actions come to be labelled as criminal or deviant, and what effects this has on those who are labelled as such. As stated in Item A, labelling theory is focused with how individuals construct society based on their interactions with each other.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Interactionists argue that a mistake most perspectives make is that they assume lawbreakers are somehow different from law-abiding people. The labelling theory suggests that most people commit deviant and criminal acts but only come are caught and stigmatised for it. It is for this reason that emphasis should be on understanding the reaction and definition of deviance rather than the causes of the initial act.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a pleather of research regarding the issue of crime and deviance. A definition of crime and deviance can be explained in relative terms which are dependant on any particular society’s interpretation of crime and deviance. Cultures differ from one society to another and the general consensus of right and wrong can also evolve throughout time. Definitions of crime and deviance can evolve with factors such as time, pace and society. However the general definition of crime is that its an act that breaks the law and deviance refers to behaviour that most people see as differing from acceptable social norms or standards of society. The purpose of this Essay is to outline and assess what each perspectives view of crime and deviance is. The perspectives that will be in this essay are Functionalists, Interactionists and conflict theories.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Some say labelling is not a ‘theory’ because it does not give an explanation of law, but questions why we have such rules. For Labelling theorists there is no such thing as crime, as we create the laws and punishments by defining certain acts to be deviant. Deviant means to depart from usual or accepted standards. Leading theorist Kitsuse said “it is the responses of the conventional and conforming members of society which identify and interpret behaviour as deviant which sociology transforms persons into deviants”. This means that it is not the actions themselves that are crimes…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Labelling theory addresses a larger definition of crime, referring not only to illegal conduct or actions but much rather to deviant behaviour in general. Deviance is seen as a quality attributed to a certain act by those who witness it directly or indirectly and deem it immoral and wrong. Behaviours acquire the label of being deviant by social interaction and maintain it by social learning. This new approach is in contradiction with the former views of crime as inherent to the action or behaviour and in some cases excusable by the circumstances such as anomie or social strain, which assume homogenous norms and equal responses or punishments to all those guilty.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stereotyping Eth/125

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Labeling Theory; is a sociological theory that tries to explain why certain people are regarded as deviants while others who engage in the same behavior are not. (Schaefer, 2012)…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Deviance and Race

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Conley, the labeling theory is the belief that individuals subconsciously notice how others see or label them, and their reactions to those labels, over time, form the basis of their self-identity. In other words, labeling theory is the idea that society determines the distinction between what is deviant and what is not deviant. This theory states that conforming members of society, especially individuals with power, impose significant labels on certain behaviors, constructing them to be deviant.…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime and deviance are always been a matter of fact, the ‘collateral effect’ of living among other people. Norms and rules are set in each society, from rural ones to the largest urban environments, but this cannot prevent the attitudes by some individuals, that in the most of case gang up, to not follow these norms. They are the deviant ones and they are condemned to be considered not normal, sometimes just without choosing that. Paradoxically, most of actions and situations that are considered as normal, under a more peculiar analysis may be not so ‘normal’. For example, the norms that consider smoking as a ‘crime’ are the ones that ban this action in public places, since smoking is injurious both to yours and to the others’ health but, in…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lilly's Labeling Theory

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thus, when discussing labeling theory, it can be assumed that society is the most responsible for the deviant behaviors of its citizens for various reasons. The first, and presumably most significant, is the fact that powerful citizens are in charge of determining which behaviors are considered criminal and which ones are not. For example, wife battering was only criminalized when individuals were motivated to create legal reform, it was not always a crime (Lilly, 2015). Society is also responsible for such behaviors because they construct the labels that lead citizens to make negative assumptions about offenders that are often times untrue (Lilley et al., 2015). As a result, these assumptions influence people’s reactions to offenders, making room for stereotyping and stigmas that produce unequal treatment for all offenders (Lilly, 2015). For example, a murder takes places in our community. While the murder itself is considered a socially deviant act, weather or not it will be viewed as a homicide depends upon the reaction of others, rather than the act itself (Lilly, 2015). If the victim was a police officer, people are going to react differently than if the victim was a…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics