The Utilitarian Theory: To Meat Or Not To Eat?

To Meat or Not to Eat Considering modern society nowadays, eating meat has become essential to our lives for the pleasure and for their products but at some point, all of us must ask ourselves “What if we were in the animals place and we were produced only to be consumed?”. To continue this discussion, we must take it to a philosophical level... so let’s get started, shall we? On the one hand, there would be no point in this reading without talking about the Utilitarian Theory which believes that it is ethically satisfactory to keep raising animals for food on the off chance that we enhance their living conditions, however it is not ethically worthy to kill them .On the other hand, there are the Deontological Theories
Well I am here to tell you that they are the alpha and the omega, regarding meat eating we would not be able to conclude without taking a strong look at these two theories. And by this point you might also be choosing a side but before you do I would like you to know, simpler, the deontological theory we will be going over says it is alright to eat animals the length of we have an ethical commitment against them and the utilitarian theory supports, eating meat by trying to eliminate the animals suffering and taking a look in their interests. While there are some people who believe that raising and killing animals for food is not acceptable, we ought to consider that the Deontological Theories say that animals have no rights at all not to forget, at the moment we are at the top of the food chain and all choices are open to us unlike some other organisms. So the real question is this, why should animals have rights and why should we respect them? In my opinion, animals that do not co-exist in our society do not have moral rights therefore I agree with the Deontological theories and I believe that animals do not have rights, can be
Horses are essential to western culture history, way back when they were the means to our transportation. Back then horses were not only used as tools, they were given the care they needed and not only that they were respected at a high level and that is still going on in the present. But that is just my opinion, right? Well as said before, the Deontological Theory believes that animals do not have a place within our ethical group, they need reason and along these lines do not have rights. A contemporary philosopher who expresses such an attitude toward the human use of non-human animals is Carl Cohen, who stands with the deontological theory, in his reading "The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research” published on October 2nd, 1986 on The New England Journal of Medicine said “Animals lack this capacity for free moral judgment. They are not beings of a kind capable of exercising or responding to moral claims”. What he tries to demonstrate with this is that even with rights most animals would not know the existence of their rights and they would just act naturally as they would be expected to do so. In other