One of the most important choices we can make in our life is choosing to spend time with our family and in being happy. Randy Pausch in The Last Lecture expresses this point perfectly. Pausch chose to take his family to Disneyworld, which is a place him and his family both love and enjoy. Pausch still treated his family no differently than when he did not know he had pancreatic cancer. Throughout Pausch’s last six months he stayed completely optimistic and was never gloomy or depressed when around his family or friends. Although Pausch could have been depressed “At the time, I already had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, but I was optimistic.”(1) Pausch expresses that even though he is now informed that he had pancreatic cancer, he still is the same man as before and will still continue to be optimistic and happy every day of his life. If you work towards being something you will achieve it eventually and you will be able to remain optimistic in Randy Pausch’s case (37). According to The Art Of Making A Good Decision many people have trouble making the right choice due to their lack of knowing their priorities. In Randy Pausch’s case he chose the right choice and spent his last six months loving and showing his care for his family and enjoying every day he had left to the fullest. Randy Pausch in The Last Lecture shows many examples in which he chose to show his family he is happy despite his illness.…
It is hard to imagine a society in which we would place a monetary value on human life. The practice of slavery in early American history was a disturbing example. Beginning in the early seventeenth century, the demand for labor became increasingly important as plantations in the South were on the rise. Slaves were considered a cheap form of labor and highly valuable. The output they provided far exceeded the input of resources. According to History.com, African-American slaves helped build the economic foundations of the new nation. Following on this principle of economics, the acceptability of slaves as a value of a transaction encouraged the spread of the system. The rationale was that, the more and higher the quality of…
Claire Mameli The differences in treatment outcomes due to the amount of hope a patient held in “The Anatomy of Hope: How People Prevail in the Face of Illness,” was a perspective I had not yet ruminated. The author, Dr. Groopman, retold the stories of multiple patients suffering from cancer, each showing that hope can have a positive outcome on treatment. This account has shown me that death is inherently a part of life, but by instilling genuine hope in a patient and their family, their remaining days can be affected positively. One of Dr. Groopman’s patients in whom this outcome occurred was with Barbara, where she accepted her condition but never yielded.…
On Saturday July 2, 2010 I meet Tiffany a 10 year old girl that has leukemia at St. Jude Children’s Hospital. We started talking and when she told me she had leukemia I was surprised how happy she seemed, so I asked her why she seems so happy when she knows she has a disease that’s life threatening, her response was “you only live once and if something were to happen to me the day after tomorrow I don’t want to have any regrets “like I wish I did that” I want to know that I lived my life to the fullest when it’s time for me to go.” When Tiffany told me that it inspired me because you don’t know what the future holds. Although this little girl had gone through intense sessions of chemotherapy somehow she still found the strength to influence…
The value of life is different for many people because it can mean anything depending on people’s belief. There’s people in the world that base the value of life on money and make people’s life seem to be worth less than the next but is completely wrong. In the article “What is a life worth?” by Amanda Ripley, she explains that in a tragic accident like 9/11 it isn’t fair that based on people's income the government would total up the earnings for the victims lifetime and give it to the family because not every family is the same.…
Rachel Naomi Remen's perception on serving, helping and fixing are understandable but I can't say that I agree with her sentiments. What I agree with most is when she says "When I fix a person I perceive them as broken." I think naturally when someone explains to you that they have fixed something, they assume you have fixed something that was broken or not quite right since it needed repair. I do not however always agree that when you fix something or someone you are judging. When you have people who have needed fixing themselves and then when they are "whole" have the opportunity to "fix" someone else, a lot of people find it humbling and are grateful for the opportunity to pay it forward. I personally do not like the word "fix". I feel that to say someone needed to be "fixed" or more so that YOU "fixed" them is showing a great deal of impertinence.…
If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers do deserve nothing less than a death for themselves and that although everyone is born with the right to live, criminals lose these rights at the moment when they take away the rights of another human and only by punishing them in such way, the society is affirming the value which is placed on the victim’s right to live.…
Myles Munroe believes that, “The value of life is not in its duration, but in its donation. You are not important because of how long you live, you are important because of how effective you live.” People in the world have their own view on life, but as Munroe states, it’s not about how long a person lives but the effectiveness of what they have done with their life because it affects how the future generations will turn out. Throughout time and space, people have debated about what the purpose of life is and why do people have the opportunity to experience it. People like William Shakespeare, Robert Ebert, and Amanda Ripley all have their own appointing views on life but they all relate to each other in many different ways.…
This chart contains a grid for different philosophical anthropologies that answer the question of personhood.…
I believe that one’s values are the foundation to his/her personal and career success. They appear in all of the aspects of one’s life. Some defines values as the concepts that describe the beliefs of a person or culture. They are considered subjective and vary across people and cultures. Values include ethical/moral values, doctrinal/ideological (political, religious) values, social values, and aesthetic values. Some experts will debate that values are innate (selfgrowth, 2011). I argue that values are learned from one’s parents at an early age. In this paper, I will emphasize on the following: The William Institute Ethics Awareness Inventory self-assessment, reflecting of my values from assessment and comparing them to that of Kudler Fine Foods.…
Furthermore, the authors are both concerned about the solution of this issue. From Taylor’s point of view, “people should pay a royalty of sorts every time they try to kill themselves using one of our cultural legacies”.…
The value of human life is still a mystery and we as a society is still trying to figure it out. During early times, life was not valued at all. People were being turned into slaves and treated like nothing. In today’s world though, we base the value of life by our achievements, one’s past, or the salary one receives. This shouldn’t be the way we value one’s life. We as a society cannot assign a value on one’s life. Money cannot buy happiness. In the article “What Is a Life Worth” by Amanda Ripley, she argues that nowadays we base life on money. “The courts started to put a dollar value on a life-after death” (“What Life is Worth”, stanza 1). I do not agree with this because people expect money after a death occurs to a loved one. No amount of money can fill in the void of a loss someone is enduring. William Shakespeare, one of the most famous and influential writer, argues his point of view of human life in “Hamlet’s Soliloquy.” Shakespeare uses a suicidal character, Hamlet, to show that the only time we value life is when something bad is happening. Also to show that life is full of misfortunes. Both Shakespeare and Ripley seem to be suggesting that life is only valued by death. Death opens our eyes and makes us cherish what we have. This sounds very sad, but it’s very true. The government doesn’t seem to care about human life. Cheri Sparacio, the widow of Thomas Sparacio, exclaims, “The government is not taking any responsibility for what it’s done. This was just one screw up after another.” The government tries to replace loss with money. How can one’s life value be bought? Nowadays, one way life is valued is by money.6 On the other hand, Lance Armstrong believes that death is not an option. That the value of life should be cherished and taken for granted because your life can end any second. In the excerpt “It’s Not About the Bike: My Journey Back to Life” by Lance Armstrong with Sally Jenkins, it talks about…
Do we have the right to take the life of someone who took a life? This argument has existed as long as the death penalty itself has. Many say that the death penalty violates our constitutional ban against cruel and unusual punishment and that the use of the death penalty serves to be inconsistent with fundamental values of our democracy. These are true, but rather than looking at religious aspects and the morality of capital punishment, let’s look at the proof that the death penalty does not work. In this essay, I will argue that the death penalty is illogical because the endless appeals clog our court systems; life in prison is a more effective deterrent against crime and the financial burden to taxpayers to carry out the death penalty are substantially greater than a sentence to life in prison.…
With this in mind, it can be understood how people were so consumed by greed that they would dismiss the value of human life so quickly and easily. Basically, the rich and powerful liked being rich and powerful. So, if…
" Life is a gift and it offers us the privilege, opportunity, and responsibility to give something back by becoming more" says Anthony Robbins. If we take the opportunity we are given and we achieve it then with responsibility we choose to have what we want for a good life. To be able to provide my family and myself with sincerity and dedication, by being ambitious, committed, focused, and whole hearted. And how I go about doing that is to be hard working and determined in everything I do. How I'm doing that is by going to school to focus on my career in Justice Administrative in digital forensics so I can also help people. I also want my family and I to move up in the world and make sure my family never goes without.…