After the story of introduction the author jumps into what the effects have been from making algebra a required course for graduation.
Helfand uses quotes from different member associated with the L.A. school board and throws in a facts and statistics to show the effects. Helfand brings the reader up to date with the decision that lawmakers in Sacramento made in 2004, making algebra a requirement state wide and how the L.A. schools district is “raising the bar again, and that by 2016 all students will be required to have the University of California’s requirements of 3 years of advanced math and 4 years of English in order to receive a diploma.” Not only does he tell what the decision was, but also tells about how “the board approved in a 6-1 vote last
June.” Helfand then changes gears and gets more in touch with students and teachers. He brings up more statistics about failing rates to show that students are getting too discouraged. He brings in quotes to show how teachers are frustrated and how it is a task to teach algebra. Helfand uses many brief examples of different students and teachers and what they are handling the situation. Then he gives the reader a quick update about Gabriela and how she dropped out and works for almost minimum wage at subway and feels she is trapped. However Helfand does bring up how many feel it is important to have algebra as a graduation requirement. He brings to light the “rationale for algebra,” that over the past decade the course of action that the school district has taken to educate its students has changed, and brings up arguments from both sides. Finally a conclusion comes of stating how he “Gives up” and doesn’t strictly state is own view on the situation. Helfand brings up that teachers may not be equipped with the skills for teaching advanced math and the shows some college percentages for teachers, and how some schools are talking the problem in there own ways. Helfand tries to make a balanced argument by bring both sides of the issue to the table; however the article is very biased and brings up issues that contradict what he is trying to show and therefore does a very poor job of writing a unbiased argument of why so many students are “Failing in L.A. Schools.”