Preview

The Virginia Plan Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
469 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Virginia Plan Case Study
The Virginia Plan, drafted by James Madison and proposed at the Constitutional Convention by Edmund Randolph, was to install a national government with a bicameral legislature and was to be comprised by representative that held seats, in the new congress, in proportion to each states population. After the delegates at convention accepted the Virginia Plan as a basis to build on the national government, debate quickly arose against the share of distributed legislative power the northern states would have over the southern states to make national policy. This was due to the northern states having much larger populations than those of the south, but since the southern states had amassed a large number of slaves, it was believed that the southern representation in congress should also include the slave population. The northern states were opposed to this idea given that slaves were generally …show more content…
I believe that the southern contention to include slaves as part of the representative count is correct and that they should be counted as whole individuals. Given the views and discussions of the time revolving slavery, the south was facing the strong possibility that norther views would have great power in congress, thus threatening southern wealth and way of life. The inclusion of the slave population to protect the interest of the south would give southern suffrage enough voting power to keep the institution in place and maintain the wealth produce by slave labor. Further, since voting is constrained to white males, who most often represent and oversee the business of their households, there can be concession to only levy taxes upon the free populace who have aspirations of wealth and property in exchange for a limitation on how long the slave population can be used as part of representation. I believe the big three states, knowing that the north states were opposed to slavery, slavery abolitionist were demanding more and growing and that the existing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine our beloved nation, that we fought tirelessly to defend from the tyrant king of England. Just to be split like an axe dividing a piece of wood. The conflict between the larger and southern states will grow into much more than just a debate. The Virginia plan and the New Jersey plan will not work and be productive. The Great Compromise will let the nation thrive because it critiques both plans and let’s the north and south work together. Let me explain why James Madison’s plan will not work.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution. Paterson delivered the New Jersey Plan with his concern of the voices of smaller states would be drawn out of larger states if the Virginia Plan been approved (Abraham Messler, 1954). His plan was particularly in response to the Virginia Plan, which in favor of proportional representation and a bicameral legislature( Leonard Williams Levy, 2000). The New Jersey Plan supported each state has one vote regardless of their population and the unicameral legislature. The with the final decision had come after their intense debate, that was the rejection of the New Jersey Plan, and the main reason was because it was too concentrated on gain more power to small states rather than the…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southerners opposed that because they think they had a right to slaves in the new…

    • 685 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War. The way that Congress made the law made it seem that it was helping the…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The hope behind this plan was to create a central government that could collect taxes, regulate foreign and interstate trade, and also be able to replace state laws with federal laws. This proposal would create central government with a powerful bicameral congress. It would consist of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Their members would be chosen by their state legislatures. The Congress would be controlled by the three largest population states, Virginia, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. The national legislature seats would be filled based on the state’s population size. This branch would also have the power to appoint executive and judiciary branches that could veto state laws.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The compromise of most importance was named the "Great Compromise." Delegates were quite interested in how their state will be represented in this recently independent country. Edmund Randolph, speaking for the state of Virginia, proposed the "large-state plan." This plan anticipated that representation for each state should be based on population. William Paterson, of New Jersey, disagreed with Randolph 's plan, fearing that the stronger states would band together and ignore the smaller, less-populous states. Therefore, the "small-state plan" was proposed, emphasizing equal representation from all states. After much argument, the Constitutional Confederation decided that the Congress would have two houses: the House of Representatives (where the number of representatives was based on the state 's population), and the Senate (where each state would have two representatives). Virginia finally agreed with this negotiation when the Confederation promised that all tax bills and revenue measurements would start in the House of Representatives, where population counted more heavily. The second compromise was a strong, independent executive branch, with a president who would be military commander-in-chief and could veto the legislation. This president would be elected through the Electoral College, rather than by the people directly. Anti-federalists believed that the executive branch did not…

    • 718 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Virginia Plan states that the “Legislative Executive and Judiciary powers within the several States ought to be bound by oath to support the articles of Union”. Furthermore the Virginia Plan calls for the negative on all laws of the state. Upon reading such parts of the Virginia Plan, one might think that the Virginia Plan gives too much power to the national government, limiting the individual state’s power greatly. Indeed, delegates against a stronger national government such as George Clinton feared that it will threaten the economic success of individual States and will lead to the abuses of power experienced under the British rule. However, after a careful analysis of the history and reason behind the Virginia Plan, one will understand that this is not the case.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A plan on abolition of slavery was not devised at the Philadelphia Convention because both states never came to an agreement the south knew that if they agreed to abolish slavery and have it ratified in the constitution their economy would go into pieces because they depended heavily on the slaves to do most of their agricultural work on the southern plantations; the slaves helping cultivate their crops. If they lost the slaves and they’d have to pay all these wages to them like they do with the white laborers then they economy would collapse…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison presented the first suggested framework of government which contained a solution to this conflict of interests in the Virginia Plan. The Virginia Plan called for a strong, unified national government rather than a loose confederation of states. The Plan gave Congress unbridled powers of legislation and taxation, and allowed Congress to veto state laws and use military force against the states.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are three reasons why slaves count in population of the states. Firstly, slaves should count because slaves count for a lot of the south’s population which means if you didn’t count the slaves it would look like the south’s had little population. Secondly, slaves are property to their owners and the owners should be able to count their slaves if they want them to count in population. Lastly, slaves should count because slaves are human too and should have the right to vote. Those were three reasons why slaves count in population of the states.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The opposition proposed a plan drafted by William Patterson. This plan became known as the “Virginia Plan”, this plan was also to increase the federal government’s power and control, but with a twist. They wanted a single house congress where each state was represented equally, not dependent upon population. Also listed was an agreement between the North and South. Southern delegates wanted protection for slavery. Without it the southern states economics would fail in the trading industries. They also requested a provision for the return of all fugitive slaves they fled to the “Free-North”. The southern states also requested that the slaves be counted for proportional representation.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The continental convention dealt with the topic of slavery by the Three-Fifths Compromise. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise that stated that a slave would count as three-fifths of a person in terms of both voting and proportional representation. It was called a compromise because it settled the unending arguments over power between the North and South. The north argued that a slave was a form of property, and because they were recognized as property there should not be any representation whatsoever for a slave regardless of how many there are in the states. The south argued just the opposite: that slaves should be counted as equal as whites, but only in the area of representation. However, the south predominantly did not see African American slaves as equal outside of strictly counting them as people for representation. They were still suppressed to vote for their delegates that represented his or her state. Also, they were not given as nearly as many rights as free white males were. Regardless, delegates from both sides did not want to even deal with slavery and wanted to put off solving the topic as long as possible. This…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people thought every slave should count towards the population like the normal people did. One reason was they took care of the land in the south and made food and farmed. A big time reason was they made up for a majority of the population. There weren't as many people as slaves in the southern states. Finally, also the northern states has bigger population so they would have more say in what the government did if the slaves did not count towards the population.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three regions that are each made up by different northern states. The first region is New England, some of the states that make up this region are Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, and Connecticut. The second region is Mid-Atlantic, the states that make up this region are New York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. The final region is the Midwest, some of the states are Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, and Ohio. In 1860 there were 31 million people living in the United States, but the slave population was 4,500,000 people. The population of free slaves was 221,000, the percentage of all african-Americans in the United States is 5 %, which is pretty small.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ratification of the United States Constitution depended on the agreement of the North and the South, and the issue of slavery was a major obstruction to this agreement. Each state’s representation was determined by the number of person’s residing in that state. The North did not want to count the slaves as part of this number because it would mean less representation for them in the government. Their argument was that since slaves were considered property, they should be equated with other chattel property, like cattle and mules. The South, on the other hand, was determined to count slaves into their population due to the high proportion of slaves in the southern region of the country. Without the support of the South, the ratification of the Constitution was doubtful, so the 3/5 Compromise was written. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution states that “population for the purposes of representation and taxation would be determined by adding the whole number of free people, including indentured servants, plus 3/5 of all slaves”. This was also called The Enumeration Clause.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays