The play's power is drawn particularly from the progression of rationalization that is delineated through the scenes that consider the possibility of purchasing justice for a million dollars. As circumstances come to light, the town engages in a collective justification of the murder of Alfred Ill for the money offered by Claire Zacchanassian. The town is poverty-stricken, and Ill, the citizens realize, has not proven to be a particularly upstanding fellow. In fact, the injustice that he committed against Claire during her youth is the precise cause of the town's misery. In the end, the town enacts justice for both itself and for Claire by killing Ill.
The play also elucidates the corruption of justice by wealth. In the past, Ill purchased false witnesses against Claire in a paternity suit. Claire responds to this misdeed by enacting her own version of justice. It is important to note that "Boby", Claire's butler, was once a judge, and has been bought into her service by the lure of a high salary. Roby and Toby, who were condemned to death by electric chair in America, have also been bought into her service; clearly, Claire's power bridges international borders. Extraordinary wealth, it seems, can place one far above the ordinary dictates of the law.
The play originated in an earlier prose piece entitled "Lunar Eclipse", which remained unpublished until 1981. The prose piece held the kernels of the plotline for "The Visit", though the arrangement of elements was quite different. The original narrative told the tale of a man who returns to his village after making his fortune, only to learn that his girlfriend from his youth has given birth to his son and then married his rival. The man returns to the village to demand the death of his rival in exchange for a large monetary donation.
The new arrangement entitled "The Visit" proves far more effective at generating and sustaining dramatic interest. In this later version of the story, the question of whether Claire will donate money to the town is transformed into the question of whether the town will kill Ill for the money. The exaggerated quality of the play is reminiscent of both Greek tragedy and German Expressionism, and is a stirring rendition of the human drama of trial and punishment.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
( The character of Lewis – he is innocent, ignorant, and immature and through the action of the play he undergoes a process of maturation and becomes aware of his own true beliefs and gains both self-knowledge and self-confidence. He gains understanding of the world and people around him. His motivation for doing the play is “I need the money” but this changes later in the play.…
- 775 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Characters in both of the plays must choose between following what society says is the right thing to do and following what they believe in their hearts to be the right thing to do. Often, choosing to follow the conscience is the more difficult road to walk. For one of the two plays, identify the difficult choices the characters make and analyze the effects that these choices have on the characters’ lives…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
It is appalling how people die for no cause. This happens in the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller in which The Salem witch trials were depicted. In Salem, 1692, many people with good reputations are sentenced to death because of supernatural "evidence." The only way to escape death was to admit that they were witches. The intolerance, fear, and reputation of the society affect the choices characters made. This shows how society can be blamed for the decisions people make.…
- 843 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In conclusion there are many themes throughout the play. Revenge, Guilt, and Integrity. Guilt makes people feel a certain way, Revenge makes people act a certain way and Integrity makes people…
- 456 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The last element of literature that holds so much tragedy is the characters themselves. Blanche is a tragic, fading beauty. She has many tragic things happen to her in the play. Blanche before coming to New Orleans had an afair with one of her students.She ends up losing her mind and being commited to a mental instituition by the end of the play. Stella is abused by her husband both physically and mentally. She loves her husband even though he does that and will not leave him. Stanley is a inferior male that beats his wife. He treat his wife like she is good for only sex.…
- 455 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This article helped explain some of the scenes better and did a good job summarizing the play. I think she pointed out some important details in the evidence the women find and that helped explain some of the symbolism better. She shows a strong distinction between the two worlds of men and women which is the reason behind the difference in their approaches to the case. She points out that understanding the relationships and people is very important. Karen included many quotes from the play to support her opinions which were very close to mine so this article was very helpful. She goes through the entire play which is more than needed but while reading through I could find the most important details she points out to help with my paper.…
- 1375 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play, The Crucible, one of the major themes shows that fear and suspicion are infectious and can produce a state of general hysteria that results in the destruction of public order and rationality. Miller conveys this theme through the characters' actions. He uses numerous situations as a metaphor of the pressure on society to conform. This play also showed that one's actions, no matter how innocent his intent, can have negative consequences on those around him.…
- 606 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Twelve Angry Men is a legal drama, written by Reginald Rose during the heightened period of 1950's McCarthyism. The didactic play presents a cross section, examining 1950's America during a period of immense suspicion and uncertainty. Roses' play reminds us of the importance of responsibility and integrity, emphasising qualities such as courage that aid in preserving justice. The play examines the power of the "lone voice" and places a special emphasis on the serving of justice over the quest for truth through a central plot and strategic framing. The idea of time versus responsibility is also addressed by Rose as his jurors struggle between honouring their role as civil servants and desires to "be elsewhere". The didactic play uncovers the virtues of the judicial system and thus highlights the jurors responsibility and the great power that they carry. Twelve Angry men extends beyond the realms of a moralistic courtroom drama, as it is applicable to both modern and contemporary audiences to ultimately highlight the importance of greater responsibility in the real world.…
- 1253 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Think of one character that makes a decision in the play. Identify the decision, explore the character’s motives, and evaluate the effects of that decision.…
- 749 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The setting of this play has a lot to do with the main theme. Because the setting is a small town, it is not use to new ideas, and major cultural shock such as a large city. The people of the town have followed…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
By comparing and paralleling the characters in the play with life’s attributes, the author’s perception of death and the treatment of death in the play; thus reminding the reader that this play is a moral play as described by the first appearing character Messenger.…
- 1802 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Conflict can bring out the best and worst qualities in individuals, and also in communities. Arthur Miller explores this in his play The Crucible. When witchcraft is declared in Salem, the reactions of the members of this strictly Puritan society differ greatly. Some see the events that take place as a chance for opportunism, a way to garner personal support, an opportunity to play out personal vengeance and also an occasion to strut one’s ability and knowledge. These characters, just as Miller intends, alienate the audience because of their self-interest and quickness to allow fear to overwhelm any genuine desire to find out the truth. The audience grieves for the suffering of the truly good characters – Rebecca Nurse, Giles Corey and Elizabeth Proctor. John Proctor, the flawed hero of the play, may have succumbed to the temptations of the flesh with Abigail Williams, but he redeems himself in the end, realizing that saving himself through lying will not resolve the conflict overwhelming his small town of Salem. He goes to his death knowing that there is ‘some shred of goodness in John Proctor’.…
- 901 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The story is set in small town Saskatchewan in a police station office, on the night of August of 1957. Corporal Heasman has brought in Les Grant on the account of accused rape Tracy Tolbertson, and the play follows the questioning of Sergeant Finestad to Les, who retells his involvement with Tracy, the daughter of Mr. Tolbertson, the local crown attorney. The story has many sub conflicts; the tension between Finestad and Tolbertson being a main one. Tolbertson wants his daughter’s accused rapist behind bars, but Finestad wants to get the whole story instead of just listening to Tolbertson. Then there is the conflict of Finestad with himself; for years he has followed the law and stuck to the book, but in this case he is having a hard time sticking to the black and white because he feels that there is more to the story. All these sub conflicts underlie to the main conflict of the prejudices and biases that come from living in a small town, and the difficulties that come with dealing with that. These conflicts all lead up to the climax where Finestand goes against Tolbertson and against the prejudices of the town and lets Les Grant go, without charging him.…
- 1620 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The main interest of the work is in a character, Matt, whose son has just been murdered, and his conflict with the concept of revenge. Throughout the story Matt makes frequent mentions to his family that he wants to and should kill his son’s murderer but is just as frequently disturbed and uncertain at this notion. Matt is never described to the reader as a violent or murderous person. The story even mentions that he was a caring and concerned father by stating that “He had always been a fearful father: when his children were young, at the start of the summer he thought of them drowning in a pond or the sea, and he was relieved when he would come home in the evenings and they were there” (92). Matt is angry with himself because he feels he should have been able to protect his son, but was not able to, and “he lost Frank in a way no father expected to lose his son, and he felt that all the fears he had borne while they were growing up, and all the grief he had been afraid of, had backed up like a huge wave and struck him on the beach and swept him out to sea.” (94). Frank, Matt’s son, was also previously beaten by Richard Strout, the man who would later murder him for “making it” with Richard’s wife. Frank’s battery was described as “Before ten o’ clock one night Frank came home; he had driven to the hospital first and he walked into the living room with stitches over his right eye and both lips bright and swollen” (91). Matt has such a burden put on him with the death of his son, and the magnitude of that event causes him not being able to think about “any of the small pleasures he had earned, as he had earned what was now…
- 701 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“There had never been a death more foretold,” the narrator asserts, repeating the truth that haunts the entire town. Dismissing their superficial reactions—”most of the townspeople consoled themselves with the pretext that affairs of honor are sacred monopolies”—he finds the murder has in fact created “a single anxiety which had made of the town an open wound.”…
- 1069 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays