The Vivisectionist And Frankenstein Analysis

This is a very interesting question. I believe we should celebrate some scientists who push boundaries and sometimes censure others. In The Vivisectionist and Frankenstein, the author explains that Claude Bernard abused animals in his experiments by baking them in hot ovens, cutting their nerves, and creating holes in their organs. Although animals are subjected to experiments for the greater good of society, Bernard should have used anesthesia in animals to ease their pain. Despite his use of brutal methods, he made a few discoveries: what are pancreas used for in digestion, purpose of the liver in glucose production, and how the nervous system works in terms of blood flow and body temperatures. In The Modern-Day Victor Frankensteins, the
author compares and contrasts recent biohacking communities and Victor Frankenstein from the novel. She argues that science may drive a person into a mad scientist when they want to obtain more knowledge. No matter what happens, a scientist cannot refute the results of their experiments because they must be responsible for their actions. Both of these articles talks about the question because it refers to people who spend a lot of their time making different discoveries in order to benefit all humans.
In Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, Victor Frankenstein pushed boundaries in a bad way. He was always interested in learning, but it started to get out of control when he wanted to accomplish something that no other scientist did before. His expectations of his creation was nothing like Victor imagined, therefore he chose to abandon the creature. Because of this, the creature started to hurt other people when it learned that humans despised him based on his physical appearance.