You made a good point that I haven't yet discovered while reading the essay "Warrior Day" by Anne Bernays. While reading the essay, I was too focused on Bernays experiences at the Marine Corps Base, and I pay no attention to Bernays religious background and reaction before she went to the Marine Base. In fact, her beliefs can affect the way she thinks and react to Dave's decision. I think you did a job deeply analyze the emotion inside of Bernays. As to answer your question A, I've always been confronted to a similar situation as Bernays. Most of the time, we would "judge another by their cover", but after knowing and interacting with them, we would regret the way we think of them, and that situation happened to me several times. Also, to your…
In the book ‘’Guns, Germs and Steel’’ By Jared Diamond explores a brief history of the human world and how it has become what it is today. When Jared Diamond takes a visit to New Guinea, he is encountered by a local politician on the beach whose name is Yali, and as they walked and talked together, Yali asked a simple question “Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?’’ .That question made Jared go on the journey of his life. The book explains how three major powers: Guns, Germs, and Steel brought by the Europeans, conquered the world and raises a simple question on why many societies and civilizations were different back then and how it has shaped the fates of humanity as it is today.…
The article, Guns, Germs and Steel, written by Jared Diamond, is an argument about how and why things happened differently in history in different continents. It’s about looking deeper into why things happened the way they did. Why did western Eurasian societies become more powerful? What enabled these parts of the world to develop more quickly and in turn be able to conquer less developed societies around the world? The important message to grasp from this article is not about how certain continents or areas becoming developed quicker, but why those specific areas were the ones to develop quicker. An example of this that Diamond discusses, is how New Guineans were still living in the “Stone Age” 200 years ago when Europeans came to New Guinea with materials (called cargo) that were very valued. The question was, why did the people of New Guinea have a scarce amount of cargo when the white Europeans had so much of it? (page 14)…
Written by Chinese tactician Sun Tzu, the Art of War presents the basic principles of warfare and gives military leaders advice and instructions on when and how to fight. The Art of War is written in a very simple and direct manner. Sun Tzu’s work can easily be grasped and his principles understood. There is however a strong sense of morality required to achieving success with these principles. Approached in a holistic and integrated way, each principle is interlocked with the others to form a sum greater than its parts in a direct and concise…
After the appeal was granted, chaos stroke throughout the city of Little Rock; the black community would endure many different types of abuse from the white citizens. The reason for it was that they were enraged of all the schooling their children had missed. The white population needed something to blame and the black people were the target for just about everything. A substantial amount of hate crimes rose as soon as the bill passed; Daisy Bates, the head chairman of the NAACP in Little Rock took lots of scrutiny for it. The main target for these hate crimes were the nine black students enrolled at Little Rock Central High School. Their families were suffering much a bundle of pain, and it was a frightening time to be living there.…
Band of brothers is a novel centered on the lives of the men from Easy Company, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division, from basic training to D-Day. It follows the jump into Holland, the Battle of the Bulge, and finally the occupation of Berchtesgaden and Austria. This is all told in a rarely seen perspective, told from the viewpoint of the front line soldier, the privates, non-coms and officers who carry out the grand strategy of generals. Many books discuss the inner working of commands at Division and Army levels, but few detail the day to day life of the soldier. Stephen Ambrose's book does that and more. It explores the how the everyday people that were drafted, worked in elite outfits like the 101st Airborne did, in World War II, defeat an enemy like the well trained German Wehrmacht and S.S. All the while pushing the theme that there was no need for there to be a single hero, or for one person to take irrational actions, because it was far too dangerous. It was far more effective and efficient to work together as a unit towards one common goal. One example of this mentality is when the airborne landed on Utah beach and by 0700 were short staffed and under gunned, with only 100 men in the battalion. The commander, having no other options, sent in Easy company to take out a four gun German battery that was defended by a platoon of 50 soldiers. This is where Lipton said,” Here the training paid off. We fought as…
In the story "War" by Timothy Findley, it is evident to the reader that the title is not actually talking about the war that is in the story but is talking about a different type of war. In the story the reader learns that the war that is being referred to is the war between Neil and his father. Neil is going though a tough time because his father is joining the army and this is hard for him to understand. Throughout the story the reader is trying to find out what the title really mean and it becomes an extra factor to the story and it is enjoyable for the reader when they realize the true meaning. It almost a mission for the reader to find the true meaning of the title in a story and in this story it is enjoyable when the message is told to the reader . The author did a great job with the title of the story because it makes the reader think about what the real meaning is.…
War is hell, but that’s not the half of it, because war is also mystery and terror and adventure and courage and discovery and holiness and pity and despair and longing and love. War is nasty; war is fun. War is thrilling; war is drudgery. War makes you a man; war makes you dead.” (Tim O’Brien, The Things They Carried)…
War is a very controversial topic for many people. Depending on the person’s outlook on the war, it can be depicted as something good or bad. War brings destruction wherever it goes, whether it is on a place or the people, and it ultimately is inevitable. War also protects a country from having further destruction and keeps the people at home safe from any danger. As a person can see in many recordings of war, there are many comparisons and contrasts that are expressed through soldiers, veterans, and civilians. Some comparisons seen in many of the testimonies given by effected people are dehumanization, dislocation, and alienation; but they also have contrasts that can be seen through nationalism, technological advancements, and the coming home for many…
War is standing up for yourself, your nation, your beliefs and rights no matter the cost. Fighting for one’s nation, what they believe in, what they deserve is what drives men in war and in spite of the horrific experiences of war their mindset and perceptions are unaffected due to fighting for what they believe is right and what they love. The horrors of war are remembered and more often than not does not leave an individual’s mind but because of the unwavering duty and patriotism displayed by individuals it isn’t difficult to recall his experiences of war due to the honourable, strong and proud…
This meant that even though they were required to carry the physical load and bear the emotional consequences, they still had to “fight” for survival. Every characteristic or thought was taken in a positive manner and helped them develop confidence and motivation that lead them to overcome the devastation of war. For example there was an epiphany for Jimmy Cross at the end of the story when he realized the predicament of not being focused in war. This lead him to burn the letters, which shows a great deal of confidence and motivation, developed during war. The act of him burning the letter made sure that he was willing to forget the fantasies about his girlfriend Martha and become focused in war. He had managed to acquire the courage by simply an incident that could have potentially proven to be fatal. Therefore this helped in developing confidence and the ability to be focused while also motivating him to be alert in war. Therefore this gives us insight that the author provides details about the consequences of war faced by the soldiers not only physically but also mentally such as fear, love and grief. The ability or mental strength required to overcome the atrocities of war is immense and this is intensified by gravity of the precarious situation. “They carried their reputation.” Thereby leading to this conclusion that war has many social and personal consequences that are reluctantly compelled onto a soldier but it undeniably lead to the development of confidence and…
Through basic training civilians are turned into Marine’s in three months. Insults and abuse are used to break their pride to destroy their ability to resist transformation of values, loyalty and attitudes that the Marine Corps. intend. What enables a man to fight is their own self-respect. Their job is basically about killing and dying, so it is essential that the recruits learn the attitudes of group loyalty and interdependency, which will be their soul hope for survival and success.…
This quote connects the theme: war destroys a person’s individuality. War makes a soldier bloodthirsty at times. Soldiers may have been kind and caring toward others, but in war, the necessity of survival is greater than ones of comrades. If a soldier’s comrade has been shot and are about to die, one would take their belongings in order to better protect oneself from further injuries. In a time of war, it does not matter about a soldier’s past personality, one gunshot could end a life, so soldiers react in order to protect themselves, to look on to the future, after the…
Tim O’Brien explores this concept when he simply states, “he was soldier, after all” (O’Brien 23). They must become a cog on the “big wheel…avoid shame” (Pollock 14). War connects men and connect them. Soldiers must prove their worthiness and bravery, not to themselves but to the soldiers that stand beside them. Soldier’s carry the “greatest fear which was the fear of blushing…. It was what brought them to war in the first place, the blush of dishonor” (O’Brien 20). Even though Jimmy Cross wanted to become a “draft dodger”, he knew that cowardliness would follow him for the rest of his life. He felt a responsibility to the men that would stand beside him. He would give up his live; he would not question; there would be no logic. He would be a “real man” and fight. In taking this action, O’Brien expresses the philosophy that the only person who can understand the thoughts of a solider is another solider. Troops walk a path that is unknown to society, but understood by the man who stands next to them on the battlefront. O’Brien continues the exploration of this group dynamics when Cross gives up his personal dream, because of the guilt he feels for the death of fellow solider Lavender. Cross burns the weight of his letters to become more adjusted to the group. He has let go of “sissy stuff...and fell to stereotypically masculine ways” (Pollock 14). In doing this a “new hardness develops in his stomach”…
Zachary Scott-Singley wrote an essay called “A Soldiers Thoughts”. His essay was based on his inner thoughts and questions, how he should and shouldn’t feel about war. Is war right or wrong? Are these people truly the enemy? What would you do to stay alive? I feel war leaves these questions open to discussion and defiantly can change based on the person and the involvement; but the work of war can change a person’s values and morals.…