Preview

The Widening Gap Between 'Bourgeoisie' and 'Proletariat'

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1223 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Widening Gap Between 'Bourgeoisie' and 'Proletariat'
The widening gap between 'bourgeoisie ' and 'proletariat '

As the title would suggest in this essay I intend to discuss the widening gap between the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat in today’s world. In a contemporary context I would take this to mean the widening gap between rich and poor and the economic inequality that continues to plague our world. In order to look at the situation in our present day we must first get an idea of what this divide means. In Marx’s day the term Bourgeoisie described a social class characterized by the ownership of capital, they were the rich industrialists who exploited the ‘Proletariat’ for their labour in order to amass great wealth. The Proletariat were the lower, working classes who in Marx’s view could ‘live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labour increases capital. These labourers, who must sell themselves piecemeal, are a commodity, like every other article of commerce.’ (1848) Today’s inequality follows a similar pattern, though perhaps a more complicated one.
In our modern world the divide is not as simple as was viewed by Marx. The groups are not as easily definable as Bourgeoisie and Proletariat, though today’s inequality is still to a large extent caused by exploitation. The wealth of the world is concentrated in a few hands -– multimillion dollar companies who’s money making schemes, masked by intricate systems of bureaucracy, transverse the globe reaching into the everyday lives of the worlds inhabitants, making a small few rich at the expense of the masses. Today’s world can be split into people who have a large amount of money and those who do not – as stated by Luisa Kroll, a Forbes Rich List staff member “This year we’ve counted 1,226 billionaires, an all-time high... The average worth of a Forbes Billionaire is $3.7 billion.” At the opposite end of the scale lie the world’s poor, a worryingly high number who live in poverty every day. According to the website



Bibliography: 1. 1776, The Declaration of Independence, http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/ 2. 7/23/2012, statisticbrain.com, http://www.statisticbrain.com/world-poverty-statistics/ 3. Kroll, Luisa. , 3/07/2012, Forbes World 's Billionaires 2012, Forbes.com http://www.forbes.com/sites/luisakroll/2012/03/07/forbes-worlds-billionaires-2012/ 4. Marx, Karl., 1848, The Manifesto of the Communist Party, Marx/Engels Selected Works, Vol. One, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1969, pp. 98-137; 5. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2012, The Price of Inequality, Allen Lane: An imprint of the Penguin books Also used for research: * Alcock, Pete., 2006, Understanding Poverty, Palgrave Macmillan * Avineri, Shlomo., 1968, The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx, Cambridge At The University Press

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After watching the video, "Wealth Inequality in America", published by Politizane, I was surprised when finding out that only the top one percent of America has 40 percent of all the nation's wealth. It was also surprising to discover that the top one percent owns half the country's stocks, bonds, and mutual bonds, while the bottom 50 percent of Americans own only half a percent of these investments. One of the notions I had that was challenged by the video was the amount of money the wealthy actually have compared to the rest of the classes. I was aware that wealth mostly distributed to the wealthy class, but I never imagined that the division between the wealthy class and the rest of the classes would be so huge. Its incredible that the CEO's…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bourgeoisie, as Marx has described them are not revolutionary simply because it is in their best interest for things to remain as they are. For the workers, both socially and geographically divided; a gap that is constantly fluctuating in modern times, to compete for smaller and smaller wages that are losing their…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As described in the Communist Manifesto, there was a division of classes that were between the proletariats that were the wageworkers and were used for labor purposes, and the bourgeoisie who were considered the capitalist class and the ones who were at fault for exploitation of the proletariats. The writing in the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, after many years has a form in which it resonates in contemporary society. Having different types of social and working classes has become more relevant throughout society and has caused for issues to arise. Although the ways they are perceived and named have changed throughout the years in different locations, the existence of these classes is still consistent throughout. There…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Critically analyze the following claim: ‘Class is no longer relevant in Australia in the twenty-first century.’…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1) Estrangement of the worker from his product; Workers suffer from being ‘alienated’, and impoverishment due to the political economy of private ownership, society is divided into classes. “Political economy does not disclose the source of the division between labour and capital, and between capital and land” (p. 32).…

    • 2988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United State Labor History

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When one considers the effect that the Industrial Revolutions of the 19th and early 20th century, the workers whose backs bore it are seldom reflected upon. It becomes ponderous whether the revolution was a boon or a malediction upon the working class and if they were truly aided by the great rise in standard of living that hallmarked this time. Those who would defend the period would cite pre-Industrialization scenarios, toiling under feudal lords with no future beyond death and an unmarked grave. An opponent of this idea, such as the renowned Karl Marx, would state, 'The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, and new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This created a disparity between the rich and the working poor. This stage in society separation, known as socialism and marked by unequal pay for the work performed, is the intermediate stage between capitalism and communism, according to German philosopher and revolutionary socialist Karl Marx’s theory “The Communist Manifest”. (“Karl Marx” 2011) Marx described Communism “as a society in which each person should contribute according to their ability and receive according to their need”. (“Karl Marx” 2011)…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph E. Stiglitz’s won the Noble Prize for economics in 2001. He is an active member of the 21st Century Council for Berggruen Institute. He wrote a book The Price of Inequity. Stiglitz presents the claim that America's economic inequality has a lifestyle effect on both the rich and the poor. He states that "people outside the top 1 percent increasingly live beyond their means" (750). He refers to this notion as "trickle-down behaviorism" (750).…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In today’s capitalist economy, where economic transactions and business in general is centered on self-interest, there is a natural tendency for some people to make more than others. That is the basis for the “American Dream,” where people, if they worked hard, could make money proportional to their effort. However, what happens when this natural occurrence grows disproportional in its allocation of wealth within a society? The resulting issue becomes income inequality. Where a small portion of the population, own the majority of the wealth and the majority of the population own only a fraction of what the rich own. This prominent issue has always been the subject of social tension from even before the French Revolution and spawns numerous other social issues in a society. In the more recent Occupy Movement, beginning in 2011, protesters used income inequality as a motive. Moreover, they were justified in doing so. In a 2010 statistic, it was revealed that the top 1% of America, own 35% of the wealth while the lower 80%, over the majority of the population, only have 11% of the nation’s wealth distributed between them. Financially the situation is even worse where the bottom 80% own only 5% of the financial wealth and the top 1% own 42% of the Nation’s financial wealth. Not to say the top 1% didn’t work hard to get to where they are, but according to the ideals of the “American Dream,” the top 1% should have worked 243 times harder than the average, not the poorest, worker in America. This extreme of disproportional wealth distribution is not only a source of social conflict, but a catalyst for various other problems that exist.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history, a divide has always existed between the rich and poor in society. However, during the Industrial Revolution in Victorian England, this rift reached its peak. The working class labored for long hours and received miniscule wages, whereas the bourgeoisie grew abundantly wealthy through the labor of the working class. Published in 1848 and 1854 respectively, Karl Marx’s The Communist Manifesto and Charles Dickens’ Hard Times both comment on these troubles. While Hard Times is a novel which tells a story and The Communist Manifesto is a short publication which tries to bring about social change, both writings offer a sharp critique of the class antagonism brought about by capitalism at the height of the Industrial Revolution.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx posited that the two classes in a society – the bourgeoisie and the proletariat – will remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. The wealthy capital-owning bourgeoisie not only owns the factories but dominate the media, universities, government, bureaucracy, and, therefore their grip on an elevated social status is unchangeable. In contrast, the poor, working class, or the…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Marx, Karl. 1971. Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Tr. S. W. Ryanzanskaya, edited by M. Dobb. London: Lawrence & Whishart.…

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vast Social Inequality

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Paul Krugman’s Confronting Inequality, we are warned, as citizens of the United States, of the damages of high and rising inequality within our country. The inequity being described is between the wealthy 1% of our nation and the 99% of the rest of the population. The author depicts America as a place where there is unclear economic progress for the middle class while the share of economic growth in the past 3 decades has gone to the wealthy minority. Krugman, next describes the damages to our society and democracy. First starting with social inequality, he says “The fact is the vast income inequality inevitably brings vast social inequality inevitably brings vast social inequality in its train” (p. 589). Within this social difference, the author tells us of how desirable school districts are growing very scarce in number and are becoming much more expensive to live in, making it so that children with low-income parents have a “bad start” in their education. Krugman also makes the point that corrupt politics is a direct result of the difference between the 1% and everyone else. For many years now, there has been tax breaks for the rich, due to the Bush tax cuts. This point leads to his solution, of undoing tax cuts for the wealthy. Krugman shows us that the Urban-Brookings Joint Tax Policy Center estimated that if Bush tax breaks expired in 2010 for those who have an income of over $200,000 that by today (2012) there would be enough money to create universal healthcare. The author’s main solution was to generally close obvious loopholes within the American system. Next, the problem of Market Inequality is brought to the table. He says that the raise in minimum wage and a steady union movement within the nation would assist this wage inequality. Finally, Krugman discusses how accessible these changes are and how rapidly they can happen. He feels as though the changes can be easily reached, but not likely. In the last paragraph, he states that although America is…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For however long it has been society has been divided into social classes, the extremely rich and the exceptionally poor. The rich, who control for the most part everything in today's age, profit by those less lucky than themselves and use the working class for their own gain. Social class divisions have constantly played a role and take part in America. Social class has been a focal idea in deciding the open doors to certain Americans while leaving the rest behind. Individuals from various financial backgrounds live unique ways of life and also have diverse open doors accessible to them.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Rich Are Different from You and Me,” author Chrystia Freeland explains the rising phenomenon of income inequality that is occurring between the richest top 10% and bottom 90% of the population. Chrystia Freeland states “In every society, some people are richer than others, but across time and geography, the gap between the rich and the rest has widely varied. The reality today is that the rich-especially the very, very rich- are vaulting ahead of everyone else” (51). Between the years of 2002 and 2007, income statistics show that the gap between the richest 10% and the bottom 90% of the population had significantly increased. Statistics also show that by 2007, approximately 35% of the wealth was maintained by the top 10%, leaving about 27% of wealth to the bottom 90% of the population. This is about an 8% gap in between. The last time income inequality was this high was in the 1920’s, but back then only 20% of wealth was gained from work. Today the top 10% gains at least 60% of their wealth from work, rather than inheritance. As economies throughout the world mature, income inequality will continue to rise. The gap between the rich and all others is primarily found in United States. Other countries such as Canada, China, and the United Kingdom are beginning to see income inequality as well. Freeland also states that “These global super- rich work and play together” (52). They share common interests such as business traveling, and vacationing around the world. Due to the common interests shared by others most like themselves, they have become separated from all others within the population, and have formed their own world governed by plutocracy. Author Chrystia Freeland is concerned that because the rich are so caught up in their world of wealth that they will not recognize that other…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays