James was telling us that if you choose not to believe after you have passed, there might be consequences. If you have chosen not to believe and follow God and God is real then you might be eternally damned. On the other side of the argument, if God is not real and you die, you have lost everything. James, unlike Clifford believed that matters of the heard were the exceptions to Clifford’s argument of having evidence to support a belief in God. James did acknowledge that the evidence that Clifford put forward was sound. James again, unlike Clifford did not believe that all beliefs of an intellectual nature had to be supported by empirical data. In review, in both essays it is clear they both believed that the evidence to support the existence of God was weak; however, disagreed on the rationale of religion and if in any case it was responsible to support the position of religious
James was telling us that if you choose not to believe after you have passed, there might be consequences. If you have chosen not to believe and follow God and God is real then you might be eternally damned. On the other side of the argument, if God is not real and you die, you have lost everything. James, unlike Clifford believed that matters of the heard were the exceptions to Clifford’s argument of having evidence to support a belief in God. James did acknowledge that the evidence that Clifford put forward was sound. James again, unlike Clifford did not believe that all beliefs of an intellectual nature had to be supported by empirical data. In review, in both essays it is clear they both believed that the evidence to support the existence of God was weak; however, disagreed on the rationale of religion and if in any case it was responsible to support the position of religious