This is a presentation about Tom Friedman’s book, called The World is Flat. Tom Friedman is a New York Times reporter and columnist who has won three Pulitzer Prizes and has had four or five bestselling books out. He gets some criticism for this book because some people think he’s a cheerleader for Globalization, and those people who are against Globalization don’t particularly like that. I think, in all fairness to Tom, although he’s very enthusiastic about his book and his subject, I think he just recognizes that, like it or not, Globalization is here, and here to stay. So maybe we need to understand it and figure out what we need to do about it, whether we think it’s good, or bad.…
Friedman begins by pointing out that the world is progressively becoming flat. He states that the only way people can get the best out of the change is to be the best themselves. This means only the people best suited…
In his essay “The World is Flat”, Thomas L. Friedman reckons with the belief of flattening world he realizes in the journey to India. Friedman notes that Columbus's sea exploration shortened the distance for Spanish monarchy to grow its wealth and power out of the "source of [India's] untold riches" (633), and discovered "the world was indeed round" (664). Columbus found the hardware source of India's riches which is the free slavery labor and natural resources, and yet Friedman found the software source of India's riches when he "encountered in the real India [which] profoundly shook my faith in [the world is round]" (664). After meeting the Indians who "taken American names" with "great imitations of American accents", "are writing specific…
In Friedman's book, "The World Is Flat" he explains many reasons as to why he believes the world is "flat". Flat meaning connected, no boundaries,or no blockages. He believes the world has slowly been flattening due to certain events/actions which he calls "flatteners." I believe some flatteners had a greater impact on globalization in the world than others. An example of one would be flattener #1. Friedman named the first flattener, " 11/9/89 When the Walls Came Down and the Windows Went Up". On November 9, 1989 the Berlin Wall…
Thomas L. Friedman analyses technological advances that are making a more economic level playing field with disadvantaged countries rising in knowledge and wealth before. Countries such as China and India has mastered in telephone and computer technology to make these nations become competitive economically. As we explore America’s place in the fast-evolving world economic platform, Friedman presents not only the problems we face, but also the preventative and the possible solutions. As he moves towards the end of this presentation of his theory, Friedman warns of the forces that could seriously harm or slow the flattening of the world, particularly the threat posed by terrorist networks such as Al-Qaeda. His perspective is refreshing in a media driven largely by scare tactics and fear mongering as he encourages a realistic and objective approach to this threat. However, the world is flat is the timely and essential update on globalization, its successes and discontents, powerfully illuminated by one of our most respected journalists. Friedman repeatedly uses lists as an organizational device to communicate key concepts, usually numbered, and often with a provocative label. Two example lists are the ten forces that flattened the world, and three points of convergence…
Many people say that this is the downfall of society, but is it? The World is Flat is a brief history of the Twenty-first Century written by Thomas L. Friedman. In Chapter Six, named The Untouchables goes over the problems of the society and how we can fix it. The chapter goes over the importance of upgrading your skills and how important your job can be. Friedman often states the concept of people starving for jobs in other countries such as India and China.…
In this chapter, Thomas Friedman looks at how cultures and societies will have to deal with and adapt to the changes that globalization brings to the way of doing business. It affects whole companies and individuals. He gives the perception of the world is flattening by comparing the Industrial Revolution to the IT Revolution that is happening right now. The flattening process was identified by Karl Marx and Frederich Engels in the Communist Manifesto, published in 1848. Marx’s writings about capitalism state “the inexorable march of technology and capital to remove all barriers, boundaries, frictions, and restraints to global commerce (Friedman 234).”…
Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: a brief history of the globalized world in the 21st century. London, : Penguin Books.…
“Farmers across the globe are beginning to throw in their boots and let robots do the dirty work” (Briggs). Technology in this world has grown over the past decades and we have become more and more reliant on our technology. Agribots and drones is the newest and latest thing in this world that could really boots our crop productivity. Thomas L. Friedman, author of The World is Flat, argues that, “As an individual, in a flat world is figuring out how to make yourself as an ‘untouchable’” (280). He then describes ‘untouchables’ as, “People whose jobs cannot be outsourced, digitized or automated” (280). In order to distinguish ourselves from others and be an untouchable we need to acquire unique skills and provide value to our work. Although many…
Thomas Friedman's lecture on his book "The World is Flat", is not only humorous but insightfully clever. Friedman's lecture breaks down the first three chapters of his book. I found this lecture interesting because studying the field of business you're instantly introduced to what globalization is but never where it actually began and the advancements it has made over time. Robert Florida's article "The World is Spiky" expanded and contrasted Friedman's theory. Robert Florida's "The World is Spiky" article was written to refute Friedman's claim that the world is flat and to insight his argument that the world is indeed spiky. Friedman argues that the global economic playing field has been leveled because people no longer have to emigrate in order to innovate. Florida argues that the global economic playing field is anything but leveled and that few regions truly matter in today's global economy. Since I tend to agree that both men have valid points, it's hard to say that I disagree with either theory. I understand Florida's argument that many places have become irrelevant in today's economy because of the lack of technological advancements, population, and resources; yet the article to me didn't really do a good job at contrasting Friedman's point of view. I felt Friedman was looking at the world in the perspective of people being able to compete in a global economy due to a broader spectrum of connectivity, such as the internet, cell phones, and express services (FedEx); while Florida was looking at the world totally in a demographic perspective and only concentrated on one aspect of Friedman's argument. Florida felt that rural and underdeveloped areas would no longer be a factor in the growing global economy because the cities and regions that drive the world economy, are growing ever higher while the valleys, with little economic activity, recede still further. I do agree that this is a valid point because there…
global approach, including Thomas L. Friedman in his book The World Is Flat, argue that…
Answer: In my opinion, Friedman does an outstanding job of convincing me and the reader that the world is flat because of technology. Also, he is a fantastic public speaker and I was very intrigued by his theories on globalization. However, in his speech at MIT I did notice him say the words “plug and play” a lot as he was speaking to the audience. Therefore, my first thought was how are the people around the world being able to afford computers and the internet. Thus, leading me to actually agree with this critic that Friedman title is a little misleading and missed the global inequality and the poverty of the world. I believe majority of the world would need to have access to the internet to make Friedman’s image of a flat world hold more truth. According to Salvador Rodriguez, “60% of world’s population still won’t have internet by the end of 2014” (http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-60-world-population-3-billion-internet-2014-20140507-story.html) On top of that, the world bank statistics show that 1.5 billion out of 2.3 billon people in both china and India earn less than 2 dollars a day. Therefore, the poverty is a very serious problem for these nations.…
According to Thomas L. Friedman, the author of The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, the current state of globalization has occurred due to three crucial three eras. The first era is classified as “Globalization 1.0”. It began with the emergence of trade between “the Old World and the New World” marked by Columbus’ exploration in 1492 and lasted until 1800 (Friedman 9). During this period, countries sought to define themselves by the level of manpower and ingenuity they possessed, and how skilled they were at utilizing their resources. The motivating force of globalization among countries was to secure their place in global commerce by finding ways to work with others. This era was significant because countries changed from being self-contained to more…
I don’t fully agree with Friedman’s vision of the “flat World”. Though I think we are more connected and informed than ever. According to me I feel Friedman’s views and research is mostly concerning the developed countries focusing on business and targeting the cooperate world. Today technology, telecommunications has definitely helped people around the world to be closer. But Friedman’s does not mention the less fortunate countries where the globalization is still a far dream. I feel Friedman’s analysis is a good fit for the rich and developed countries, where World has changed to a “global village”.…
According to the table that shows Gamma turnover is 5.8 times and it's mean Gamma collect his receivables about 5.8 times each year but alpha turnover is 1.4 times and it's mean that alpha collect his receivables about 1.4 times each year. So, Gamma Corporation has higher proportion than Alpha Corporation and it shows that gamma corporation operates more efficiently with smoother cash flow and collects the money from the creditor easily and on the time. Also, that probably gathered the credit deals than alpha company that have lower proportion.…