What is freedom of the press? * Encapsulated in the bill of rights (first amendment). * “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freed of speech, or of the press, or the rights of people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. “ * You have responsibility for your speech and your publication; individuals have the right in the face of the collective, as unpopular as the words are. * Benjamin Franklin = printers know that if both sides of the story are told its good * James Madison = some degree of abuse is inseparable from the proper use of everything, and in no instance is this more true than in that of the press * Under the magna carta, sovereignty was reserved to the parliament, under the constitution that power comes from the people * Alien and Sedition Acts * John edams signs them into law in 1798 * Aimed at trying to prevent immigrants from rising up against US government, when their home nation gets into a war with the US * Espionage act (1917) * Sets new penalties including death, for anyone who violates government secrecy * A person is guilty if “obtaining or delivering information” you’re not supposed to have * Near v. Minnesota (1931) * Near prints story about Minnesota officials having links with illicit business * They shut him down, and Near challenges the injunction, but loses case, and is not permitted to print ANYTHING * Near goes to the state supreme court and he is allowed to print, so long as it does not damage the welfare of the city * He goes to the US supreme court, and wins * “Every man has a right to publish what he wishes and if it be defamatory and libelous, suffer the consequences later”. – Justice Louis Brandeis * “the fact that the liberty of the press may be abused… by purveyors of scandal does not make any less necessary the immunity of the press from prior restraint in dealing with official misconduct”- Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes * No prior restraint * Government cannot stop something from being published, except in rare instances, but the author or organization can be punished later * Two exceptions to the No prior restraint rule * Obscenity * National Security – Direct immediate and irreparable damage to the nation and it’s people * Pentagon Papers case (NY Times vs USA) * Daniel Ellsberg leaks secret defense documents * Court rules “you can only stop publication in advance when immediate and irreparable damage to the country can be done” * Libel vs. Slander * “Slander is spoken. In print, it’s libel.” * Defenses to libel * Truth * Privilege – Even if something about you is untrue, if I got that information from a court document, a government document where somebody makes that allegation its not Libel, simply a report * Fair comment – So long as you are commenting on something that’s in the public interest, or publication, and there is no intent to damage * No prior restraint – “Freedom of the Press is the right of the press to be wrong”- Attorney Alan * The fourth Estate – People * The press as a “watchdog” * The watchdog as its own censor * (Bay of Pigs Invasion) * Columnist from the New York Times knew about the Bay of Pigs invasion, but did not report about it because it may put troops in danger * Documented Mistreatment CBS * The Role of the Press in War * Other Conflicts * The right to know * 854,000 people have access to top secret documents * The right to know vs. Privacy * There is no right to privacy in the constitution. * Not expressly written like the right to free speech * A free press vs. A fair trial * “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and ..” – 6th amendment * Judges have remedies: * Change of venue * Gag orders * Voir dire- Closely question the Jury * Sequestering the Jury
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Stanford Daily, the respondent sought to enjoin Zurcher, the petitioner for abridging the newspaper’s constitutional right of possessing photographs and a report on a demonstration at a hospital. A warrant was issued from Zurcher to search The Stanford Daily for the demonstration photos based on probably cause. The paper then filed a suit claiming the warrants were unconstitutional by right of the First and Fourth Amendments of the Constitution.…
- 376 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…
- 165 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Case: Near v. Minnesota 1931 U.S. Supreme Court Parties Jay Near (Plaintiff) State of Minnesota (Defendant) Facts: A publication, The Saturday Press, published an article alleging that City officials of Minneapolis were complaisant with gangsters who were engaged in illegal activities in the city. A Minnesota law was in effect which allowed the state courts to enjoin a publication which was engaged in a public nuisance. To be a nuisance the publisher had to be printing material that was malicious, scandalous, and defamatory.…
- 1889 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Black dissents there were “no threat or menace to the integrity of trail.” “the courts have consistently required that the press have a free hand, even though we sometimes deplored its sensationalism.”…
- 1274 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
In the case of Barber v Times Inc, a photographic artist took pictures of Dorothy Barber during her conveyance. Ms Barber documented a suit of ‘invasion of privacy against Time Inc for unapproved and intense section into her healing facility room and for shooting…
- 441 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
But free speech was not a defence for us to argue. Instead, a jury would decide whether our magazine was obscene or indecent? I admit it may have been shocking, even disgusting. But the prosecution said it was “intended to deprave and corrupt”. We disagreed.…
- 544 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Eventually on the day of sentencing the judge is unmoved by the protests and sentences them all to jail for varying terms. He also compliments the ‘obscene Publications Squad’ for their good work.…
- 1156 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The importance of the first amendment on contemporary journalism is huge. Without the first amendment, the whole concept of contemporary journalism could not exist. This fact is true because through contemporary journalism writers truly show the power of freedom of speech. Most of the writing we come across in various forms of news are based on the opinions of the author. Without the power of the first amendment this freedom would not be possible in any way.…
- 291 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Though this new actual malice standard strengthens the freedom of the press, it enacts a heavy burden against people in libel cases. The actual malice standard requires heavy and firm proof in order to sue for libel, lifting the stress off of news organizations in order to publish more stories, without fear of a libel lawsuit. Now people facing defamation and libel have a harder time in keeping their reputation clean, false and malice statements now effortlessly harm the reputation of public figures. These public figures now must provide heavy and strong evidence that these statements are intentionally actual malice, making it a struggle to rise to…
- 644 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A newspaper should not publish an unofficial charge affecting reputation or moral character without opportunity given to the accused to be heard; right practice demands the giving of such opportunity in all cases of serious accusations outside a judicial proceeding. A newspaper should not invade private rights or feelings without sure warrant of public right as distinguished from public curiosity. It is the privilege, as it is the duty, of a newspaper to make prompt and complete correction of its own mistakes of fact or opinion, whatever their origin. [Taken from the American Code.]…
- 2922 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
* A high school student paper in Bakersfield, California, was prohibited from publishing a story with interviews about gender identity, but a county judge ruled that student to have the right to exercise freedom of speech.…
- 1831 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
A free and open media is essential to a functioning democracy. Its role in politics is to “encourage democratization, strengthen the rule of law and promote institution building” (UN News Center). In order for a democracy to work properly, citizens need to be informed on the issues at hand, in a fair and unbiased manner, so they can make sound decisions as to which candidates to vote for. The role of the media in democracy has been realized since the institute’s earliest inception. In 1791 the 1st Amendment was made to the Bill of Rights, and it stated that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press; or the right of the people to peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (PBS). If free press becomes compromised, such as being taken over and run by biased private corporations, then a country’s democracy is at risk, and it can lead to the country becoming a fascist state. In America, the media plays a decisive role in politics and in determining which agendas are successful and which are not and whether or not it has been compromised by private interest continues to be debated.…
- 2399 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
In democratic system people are participating in political and decision making process without considering their race, color, physical ability such as Scandinavian countries. They are able to decide on their destiny directly or through their representatives. Each individual have their votes and these votes are effective and able to change decisions. There is no lumber on their choice and government can not mobilize citizens to pro-government relies; in contrast people are being mobilized by themselves or non governmental organization to put a pressure on the government. However, in non-democratic regimes people are not participating in political process and they were restricted by central body. The government has absolute powers over its citizens and nobody have a right to freely participate in election, decision making process and so on. The government dominated everything and every activity within the territory of its sovereignty. Furthermore, the government has an authority to practice some policy to mobilize people for particular purposes like demonstrating against some countries or the activity of opposition parties or to show of that their government is representing their dignity and choices (Allen, 2002). For instance, the former Iraqi regime restricted people from voting and the government banned any anti governmental actions, tortured and jailed people especially women and mobilized people to pro-government demonstrations against the USA and Israel (Lasky, 2006).…
- 1706 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The petitioner is the printer, publisher and editor of a recently started weekly journal in English called Cross Roads printed and published in Bombay. The Government of Madras, the respondents herein, in exercise of their powers under section 9(1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act) whereby they imposed a ban upon the entry and circulation of the journal in that State. His Excellency the Governor of Madras, being satisfied that for the purpose of securing the public safety and the maintenance of public order, it is necessary so to do, hereby prohibits, with effect on and from the date of publication of this order in the Fort St. George Gazette the entry into or the circulation, sale or distribution in the State of Madras or any part thereof of the newspaper entitled Cross Roads an English weekly published at Bombay. The petitioner claims that the said order contravenes the fundamental right of the petitioner to freedom of speech and expression conferred on him by article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution and he challenges the validity of section 9(1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act as being void under article 13(1) of the Constitution by reason of its being inconsistent with his fundamental right aforesaid.…
- 3943 Words
- 16 Pages
Good Essays -
[11] Prestage, Jon. “Mainstream Journalism: Shredding the First Amendment.” Online Journal. com. 7 Nov. 2002. Web. 27 Aug. 2011.…
- 4698 Words
- 19 Pages
Best Essays