Preview

Theft And Burglary Explain The Role Of The Magistrates Court

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
593 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theft And Burglary Explain The Role Of The Magistrates Court
In relation to offences which are triable either way, (e.g. Theft and Burglary) explain the role of the magistrates court in determining the appropriate venue for the trial to take place.

There are over 12,000 different criminal offences1, which can be classified

under 3 different categories. The first category is summary offences, which are

defined by statute and are usually minor offences such as traffic violations and

common assault and are all dealt with at the magistrates court.

Approximately 90% of all cases are dealt with in the magistrates court, which in

2011 was an estimated 1.62 million defendants conducted against2. There has

been criticism that more offences have been made summary only, reducing the
…show more content…
When a case falls into the triable either way category, they determine which

court the case will be tried in at ‘plea before venue’ and ‘mode of trial

hearings.

If the defendant chooses to plead guilty at the ‘plea before venue’ hearing, then

the magistrates will continue to hear the facts of the case and any previous

convictions. If they feel their sentencing powers are inadequate, the case will be

sent to the Crown Court for sentencing. However, if they have jurisdiction, the

magistrates can sentence the defendant. Since R v Goodyear4, the defendant can

now request an indication of whether the sentence will be custodial or not.

If the defendant pleads not guilty or refuses to state a plea, the magistrate’s have

a ‘mode of trial’ hearing5. If the magistrates agree to the hearing, the defendant

will be given a date for a summary trial. However, even if the magistrates agree

to jurisdiction the defendant has the option to elect for a Crown Court hearing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The principal piece of the trail procedure would be the first appearance. In this the litigants are brought under the steady gaze of a judge to be given forma notification of the charges against them, to be educated concerning their rights, to be given the chance to hold a legal advisor or to have one named to speak to them, and maybe to be managed the open door for safeguard. The respondent if taken into authority must be offered an in court…

    • 976 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John R. Harig Case Study

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    MILLERSBURG — Found competent to stand trial, outstanding motions to dismiss the charge against a Marshallville man and have the amount of bail revisited will have to wait for another day, one on which he can be in court with his attorney.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role of the court is to determine whether or not a crime has been committed and impose a sentence where appropriate. In the first instance the alleged offender will appear in the magistrates court where it will be decided whether or not to grant bail or remand in custody…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    QSC 27: Access To Justice

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages

    • If the client insists of pleading guilty, you must obtain written instructions that the client still wishes to please guilty. Alternatively, you may withdraw ‘and allow the accused to present his own plea.’ • This will ensure you as an officer of the court is protecting the administration of justice, and not ‘misleading the court.’ b.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    • You will be asked how you plead, your options are; Guilty, Not Guilty, or…

    • 1305 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Where an appeal against severity is lodged in the Local Court the date of hearing in the District Court is endorsed on the Notice of Appeal. This is not a mention date and practitioners should be prepared to proceed with the appeal on that date.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The role of Jurors and Magistrates are similar in many ways. A few examples of the similarities would be that both must be 18-70 years old. In addition to this, those who are in the police force or have previous criminal convictions are ruled out. Both magistrates and jurors are members of the public and do not get paid for going to court. However, both can claim expenses for any earnings lost during the time they spent in court. Both parties make their decisions and verdicts on the facts presented to them. Not only this but both can decided whether a defendant is guilty or not guilty.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bean Divorce Decree

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. This matter brought before the court on the 22nd day Of March, 2013 for a final…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This hearing can also be called a fact-finding hearing. All parties that pertain to the case will be subpoenaed to testify before the judge. Some witnesses may be excluded from the courtroom until they have finished testifying. If you are the victim, you have the right to be present during the entire court preceding. Since there is no jury trials for juveniles, the judge will then make the decision if the juvenile is innocent or guilty. During the adjudication hearing the prosecution and the defense has the right to make opening statements to the judge. It is then the responsibility of the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the juvenile committed the crime. If the judge determines that the juvenile defendant is delinquent, the judge then will set a date for the disposition hearing. In some cases the disposition hearing is held immediately (Clallam County, Washington,…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discretion within the criminal trial process is a very important matter, as the judge or magistrate must exercise appropriate measures in order to reach a just verdict. For example the evidence presented in trial must be approved by the Judge or Magistrate in case the evidence used in court appears inadmissible or prejudicial. The Evidence Act 1995 applies court discretion within the trial process as it allows for the quality of fairness. Without the exercise of impartiality within the trial process the decision made by the jury may alter the final…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Lay- person in the context of a lay magistrate is a person with no legal qualifications or training in law. Their purpose is to provide experience of society and ensure that the common people’s values are represented when delivering a verdict. Most magistrates are lay magistrates and they are also referred to as justices of the peace. There are roughly 30,000 lay magistrates sitting on the bench and they usually sit in threes but section 49 of the crime and disorder act 1998 allows single magistrates to exercise certain powers when administering justice. All magistrates are appointed by the Lord Chancellor on the advice of the local advisory committees for each area. To become a Lay magistrate a person must be between the ages of 18 to 65 but this requirement has only recently come into place, with the requirement being dropped from 21 to 18 in 2003. A lay magistrate must have six key qualities to enable them to be appointed, these ensure that the magistrate is of sound mind and judgement. Most magistrates are nominated by groups such as trade unions but a person can nominate themselves to partake in the role. The maximum sentence a lay magistrate can give if up to 6 months imprisonment and a £5000 fine. Therefore there power is restricted enabling them to only deal with certain cases. It is said that magistrates are involved in 97% of cases whether this is in the pulmonary stages or the final sentencing; therefore it is clear to see that they play a vital role within the legal system.…

    • 3775 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early times, burglary was a crime of precise definition and only under certain circumstances were acts considered criminal. Furthermore, burglary was originally defined in the old common law as “breaking and entering into the dwelling or structure of another at night with an intent to commit a felony inside”. At present, by court decisions and regulation, the characterization of the crime of burglary has evolved to include many more accurate situations. To common law writers the above progression made sense because the expansion of the original concept of security of the dwelling was in response to social…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    if the case is tried under the rules of the common law branch, the judge can still inform the jury…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Convictions

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    verdict will be handed down at that time. Based on what the crime is, what type of punishment…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Haider

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before a Magistrate within a period of twenty four hours of his arrest.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics