Preview

Theme Of Opposites In King Lear

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
665 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theme Of Opposites In King Lear
Ah, King Lear, one of Shakespeare's most famous tragedies and a pox upon history students everywhere. Kidding! Anyway, while the play had a great many motifs to be considered, one of the most central was the theme of opposites. Not only between characters can we see this theme manifest, but within characters as well, as a few of them turn from people of stature to beggars and the banished, and from villains to heroes.

Firstly, quite a few characters in the story have counterparts that are the polar opposites of them. Look at Goneril and Regan's husband: Cornwall, Regan's man, is willing to kill her father in his desire for power, while Goneril's husband Albany is aiming to save the king and restore peace. Lear's youngest daughter is the honest and virtuous one, as opposed to Lear's buddy Gloucester's youngest kid, who is wicked and conniving. The same division appears between Edgar and Edmund, which parallels Lear's two oldest daughters and Cordelia.
…show more content…
Edgar must masquerade as the beggar Poor Tom to become victorious in the end, just as Cordelia will lose her standing and be banished in order to come back with an army to try to help her father. Aside from loss of social status, there are characters who experience existential changes, and see the error of their ways. King Lear himself starts our tale with a slow spiral into madness, but in Act V when he's in a cell with Cordelia, he realizes he was wrong and tries to reconnect with his daughter, even asks for forgiveness (ACT V, SCENE III), probably because the audience needs some glimmer of hope in a situation where the good guys are losing so

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's King Lear is a play revolving around the themes of human nature, madness and childishness.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Each character's ambitions eventually lead to the tragic fate of death. Goneril, Regan and Edmund are portrayed as ruthless cunning characters, but despite the sinister actions of the three, pathos can still be earned. Throughout Shakespeare's King Lear Goneril is deceived as an antagonist and ruthless character, however, when looking at the…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In King Lear, the parallels between Lear and Gloucester are made clear. Both have loyal and disloyal children, both are blind to the truth and both end up banishing their loyal children and making their disloyal children their heirs.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare in Lear, presents the notion that characters in great authority force suffering upon others in an effort to retain power, admiration, and status. Initially, Lear himself demonstrates this, appallingly treating Cordelia with an irrational snap judgement when he is embarrassed in court by his youngest daughters silence and lack of praise; “Here I disclaim all my parental care.” (1:1:107) This unjust sentence is highly ironic, especially for the audience, as dramatically we see transparent farce of Gonerill and Regan’s dedications of love, and the total truth of Cordelia’s. Due to the “infirmity of his age” (1:1:284) (Lear) the unjust pain Cordelia endures for his mistake is greatened, and due to this dramatic irony the audience is forever hopeful for some form of justice and resolution to come.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shakespeares The Tragedy of King Lear has been carefully constructed to create a domino effect: had Cordelia said more than nothing, had Gloucester spoken to Edgar about the letter, and if Edgar had not decided to become a beggar he may not have been able to save his father. Harmatia is thus present as the audience wonders what would have happened had Edmond not ordered Cordelia to be killed. Hence the hand of fate or more appropriately, the hand of the playwright is evident and draws the audiences attention to the immense suffering of humanity and to the idea of redemption. Though Shakespeare created the play with the purpose of eliciting Catharsis within the audience there is the idea that he took it too far. A.C Bradley challenges the integrity of King Lears cathartic ending; surely the tragic outcome of Lears error and his daughters ingratitude has been made clear enough and moving enough with a tragedy this should seem inevitable. But this does not. It is not even satisfactorily motivated. In fact it seems expressly designed to fall suddenly like a bolt from a sky created by the vanished storm. Clearly he believes that the conclusion was overdone as there were far too many dead bodies on the stage and as the play became more horrific and gruesome the cathartic elements were minimised.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Essay

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Shakespeare’s plays were written in the Elizabethan era, which profoundly influenced his writing. During the Elizabethan time, there was the idea that God had set a place for everything in the universe, in hierarchical order. The Elizabethan’s called this, The Great Chain of Being. During this time if someone were to step out of his or her place in this divine line, it would not only be extremely uncommon but it would be sinful, inhuman. That power thirsty human would be succumbing to their inner animal, and therefore step down a rank on The Great Chain of Being. The Great Chain of Being influenced all beliefs throughout the Elizabethan era, and that is evident through Shakespeare’s writing. The symbols and motifs he used in his play King Lear, are undoubtedly connected to Elizabethan beliefs and views.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear is an 80 year old ruler of ancient Britain. He is a head strong old man and decides he will retire from the throne and divide his kingdom among his three daughters- Goneril, Regan and Cordelia. He is blind to his weakness and misjudges, believing that the two evil…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    gah tater poutine

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The concept of good vs. evil revolves around morality. In William Shakespeare’s plays, King Lear and Hamlet, the presence of good and evil has many similarities and is very comparable. The reason in which these two plays are so relatable is because they are both tragedies. Both King Lear and Hamlet have an ongoing feud within the family. Claudius in Hamlet and the sisters Goneril and Regan in King Lear have the attributes of evil, Horatio in Hamlet and Cordelia in King Lear prove the qualities of good, and Hamlet and King Lear themselves being the main protagonists, have a continuous battle with good vs. evil, both mentally and physically. These characters, when compared, are all very relatable.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Both characters suffered from a psychological blindness. Lear were unable to see his two daughters deceiving him, along with being unable to see Cordelia’s true love. He also portrayed this inability to see when he banished his loyal follower, Kent. When he was unable to realize that it was Kent in disguise as his servant, it only reinforces the theme. The consequences of his condition were that “tragedy id inevitable”, his blindness did not allow for him “to recognize the errors of his decisions” this is the direct cause for the kingdom being “torn apart” (Pappril 3). Gloucester also was seriously affected by this blindness. This caused him to not be able to see the true and honorable man that Edgar was, and not see the truly evil person that Edmund was. A part of these two heroes’ journeys was Lear and Gloucester’s ability to overcome this blindness, and regain a true sense for the moral flaws of themselves. Luckily, they began to see the true qualities of the people that they once trusted, or the people that they once rejected. Lear’s “eyesight” began to recover as the play progressed. He began to see the true colors of Goneril and Regan after they refused to let him live with them and locked them out of his castle during the perilous storm. He was faced with the fact that their eulogies that were given at the beginning of the play were nothing but lies to benefit their own selfish causes. Most importantly, Lear was gaining the aptitude to get passed Cordelia’s inability to adulate her father and see that her love truly was so vast that it was indefinable. Lear is able to overcome his haughtiness and results in him begging for forgiveness from Cordelia. Gloucester’s sight begins to make a reappearance in Act IV when he realizes that Edgar was Poor Tom and it was his son who saved his life. He then comprehends that Edmund was completely dishonest and that it…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's King Lear is a play which shows the consequences of one man's decisions. The audience follows the main character, Lear, as he makes decisions that disrupt order in his Kingdom. When Lear surrenders all his power and land to his daughters as a reward for their demonstration of love towards him, the breakdown on order in evident. Lear's first mistake is to divide his Kingdom into three parts. A Kingdom is run best under one ruler as only one decision is made without contradiction. Another indication that order is disrupted is the separation of Lear's family. Lear's inability to control his anger causes him to banish his youngest daughter, Cordelia, and loyal servant, Kent. This foolish act causes Lear to become vulnerable to his other two daughters as they conspire against him. Lastly, the transfer of power from Lear to his eldest and middle daughter, Goneril and Regan, reveals disorder as a result of the division of the Kingdom. A Kingdom without order is a Kingdom in chaos. When order is disrupted in King Lear, the audience witnesses chaotic events that Lear endures, eventually learning who truly loves him.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Essay

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    At the beginning of the play, King Lear’s loss of the throne is his responsibility and entirely his own fault. Lear had hopes to rid himself of the burden of the throne by giving away the power of his kingdom to the daughter whom he feels loves him most. When speaking with his three daughters, Lear inquires “which of you shall say we doth love [me] most” (I.i.49), both Regan and Goneril shower Lear with flowery words and exaggerated lies. Upon delivering these lies to their father, Regan and Goneril are both granted power over parts of Lear’s kingdom. When it comes time for Cordelia to express her love she speaks the blatant truth enraging her father with her love for him only going so far as to cover “[her] bonds, no more, no less” (I.i.92-93). Lear’s excessive pride and arrogance does not allow for him to accept the truth, thus causing him to “declaim all [his] paternal care” (I.i.113). Lear’s injustice towards Cordelia, his only honest and loyal daughter is proof that a civilization needs justice to be a functioning society.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Parallel Points

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The emotional effect is heightened in King Lear with Shakespeare’s use of a subplot that mirrors the father-child relationships, the corruption of political power, and the death of the protagonist in the main plot. The subplot of Gloucester, Edmund, and Edgar in King Lear serves three main purposes. The main plot is the betrayal of King Lear by his two elder daughters, to whom he abdicates his power, during the first part of the play. The subplot is the similar story of the betrayal of the Earl of Gloucester by his illegitimate son Edmund. In both cases, the other victim of the conniving children is the one child who was truly faithful to the father: Cordelia in the case of the king Lear and Edgar in the case of Gloucester. Both betrayals occur because the fathers foolishly believe their sinister children who trick them into believing that their good-hearted siblings are the villains.…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, it is important to know a brief history of King Lear. He is an aging man who is loyal and a father that is loving to his daughters. Lear is identified as very generous especially when he tends to give away most of his responsibilities as a king to his daughters. As innocent and clueless as he is, king Lear simply becomes shocked and upset by his daughters betraying their own father. Later on in the novel, Lear’s whole personality transforms, as he rejects power and politics. Instead, he realizes the most crucial matter is being with the people that he loves. Soon, after seeing poor Tom, he spends precious time with thoughts and feelings for him. All of this information clearly shows how sympathetic and pure King Lear truly is throughout the novel, until 4.6.172-191, which unexpectedly reveals King Lear in a different way.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Filial relationships portrayed by the characters in both texts unravel an inner journey that the protagonists must overcome. In King Lear, filial relationships are questioned. King Lear’s two eldest daughters Goneril and Regan both reject their father upon hearing that he will pass on his responsibilities as a king however keeping his title. The two sisters come up with a plan to whichAlbany describes Goneril’s and Regan’s unspeakable acts towards Lear. “What have you done? Tigers, not daughters... Whose reverence even the head-lugged bear would lick, most barbarous, most degenerate, have you madded… Like monsters of the deep.” The use of negative diction and…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Two other characters in King Lear working for self-gain are Goneril and Regan. Both have the same motive: to take all the power for themselves, usually at the expense of the other. In the beginning, they are seen to be working together, but towards the later parts of King Lear, it is shown that they are competing each other for…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays