Hardly mentioned at all, there was another character in Hamlet that received his revenge at the end of the play. Fortinbras, prince of Norway set off to regain the lands of Denmark, which were lost to King Hamlet Senior years ago. Fortinbras was returning to win back his lands, which he did, and he did so very peacefully. Fortinbras regained the lands that were rightly his, as there were no more heirs to the Danish throne. Horatio almost foreshadows the movements of Fortinbras, but no further of him is mentioned until the end of the play. “Now, sir, young Fortinbras, Of unimproved mettle hot and full, Hath in the skirts of Norway here and there Shark 'd up a list of lawless resolutes, For food and diet, to some enterprise That hath a stomach in 't; which is no other— As it doth well appear unto our state—But to recover of us, by strong hand And terms compulsatory, those foresaid lands So by his father lost.” (Act I, Scene I, Shakespeare) Fortinbras choice for revenge is the only one that ended up with no more murder involved. All three characters, Laertes, Hamlet, and Fortinbras, were so obsessed with avenging their father’s death, nobody survived to be able to gloat about his victory, except for Fortinbras.
Revenge is characterized by a chain of bad choices with another individual feeling he is obligated to make the situation fair once more. Hamlet by William Shakespeare is powerful play that exemplifies the cruelty of revenge and how much anger and how little reason are truly involved. There is never a real need for revenge, as more of it will eventually lead to the demise of everyone involved. Thousands of years before Shakespeare wrote his plays, Hammurabi created the first law book, almost foreshadowing the dangers of revenge. “An eye for an eye will leave the whole world blind”, while murder for murder will only lead to more murder.
Works Cited
"Elizabethan Revenge in Hamlet." Novel Guides. Web. 1 Jan 2013. <http://www.novelguide.com/ReportEssay/literature/shakespeare/elizabethan-revenge-hamlet>.
Prosser, Eleanor. "Hamlet and Revenge." HowlandPak. HowlandPak, Web. 1 Jan 2013. <http://howlandpowpak.neomin.org/powpak/cgi-bin/custom_page_display.pl?id=thomas.williams&cp=28>.
Mabillard, Amanda. "Revenge in Hamlet." Shakespeare Online, 12 2011. Web. 1 Jan 2013. <http://shakespeare-online.com/playanalysis/revengetragedy.html>.
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. London, England: 1603. Print.
"Shmoop." Hamlet. Shmoop University, Inc. Web. 1 Jan 2013. <http://www.shmoop.com/hamlet/>.
Cited: "Elizabethan Revenge in Hamlet." Novel Guides. Web. 1 Jan 2013. <http://www.novelguide.com/ReportEssay/literature/shakespeare/elizabethan-revenge-hamlet>. Prosser, Eleanor. "Hamlet and Revenge." HowlandPak. HowlandPak, Web. 1 Jan 2013. <http://howlandpowpak.neomin.org/powpak/cgi-bin/custom_page_display.pl?id=thomas.williams&cp=28>. Mabillard, Amanda. "Revenge in Hamlet." Shakespeare Online, 12 2011. Web. 1 Jan 2013. <http://shakespeare-online.com/playanalysis/revengetragedy.html>. Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. London, England: 1603. Print. "Shmoop." Hamlet. Shmoop University, Inc. Web. 1 Jan 2013. <http://www.shmoop.com/hamlet/>.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Shakespeare crafts the play so Laertes can have an illogical need and desire for revenge. Laertes is determined to make Hamlet pay: “I am satisfied in nature, / Whose motive in this case should stir me most / To my revenge". Laertes’s need for revenge indicates his desire for closure and his wish to find inner peace. Laertes believes that the solace he desires will come through revenge: "But in my terms of honor / I stand aloof, and will no reconcilement / Till by some elder masters of known honor / I have a voice and precedent of peace.” Again, this demonstrates the need for closure and shows the reasoning behind Laertes’s thirst for justice, reinforcing Shakespeare’s theme of…
- 583 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The differences between Laertes and Hamlet affect a main theme of the play revenge. Both men have fathers killed, and both are seeking revenge. Hamlet, though he knows who murdered his father, hesitates to take direct action against the villain. In stark contrast is Laertes, who doesn’t know who killed his father but will kill anyone on a whim. Laertes’ rashness throughout provides the play with an unlikely stereotypical hero-- brave, unwavering, ready to kill-- and is rather ironic because Laertes is not the play’s “hero” role. The hero instead is Hamlet, and Hamlet is not a typical hero, in that he shies away from violence, and is portrayed as insane for half of the play (though that is by his own doing). Hamlet is not even able to kill his uncle until Act 5, by which time he can be argued to be mentally and emotionally instable, if not insane. In order to avenge his father’s death, Hamlet must lose himself in insanity; he must become, essentially, an entirely different character.…
- 1220 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, the theme of revenge is very palpable as the reader examines the characters of Hamlet himself, as well as Laertes, son of Polonius, and Fortinbras, prince of Norway and son of the late King Fortinbras. Each of these young characters felt the need to avenge the deaths of their fathers who they felt were untimely killed at the bloody hands of their murderers. However, the way each chose to go about this varies greatly and gives insight into their characters and how they progress throughout the play.…
- 1346 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout the play it becomes quite evident that Laertes is Hamlet's foil. He mirrors Hamlet but behaves in the exact opposite manner. Where Hamlet is more verbal and conscience about his actions, Laertes is physical and very blunt in his decision making. "How came he dead?...Let come what comes, only I'll be revenged/Most thoroughly for my father's death." [Act IV, Sc V, Lines 141-147] reveals that unlike Hamlet, Laertes is very determined to quickly seek out his father's killer and to have his revenge without regards to the consequences. As soon as Laertes learns of his father's death he is furious with anger and immediately demands to know who it was that committed this crime. He doesn't waste time with soliloquies or take into account his conscience but is driven solely on his emotions and the task of avenging his father. "To cut his throat i'th' church" [Act IV, Scene VII, Line 139] proves Laertes' physical characteristic that Hamlet lacks. When Laertes is questioned by Claudius about the extent he will go to in achieving his revenge it's ironic that his remark is exactly what Hamlet could not follow through with. His brutality again shows his determination to accomplish his task by whatever means. It is clear that Laertes' love for Ophelia and responsibility to Polonius drive him to passionate action, while…
- 798 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
and Laertes differ, Laertes acts as a stable foil for Hamlet whom makes sound decisions and acts on his words instead of just speaking. Laertes allows us readers to explore how Hamlet should have acted instead of how he did: Inactive, in a state of delay, and full of words. The moment Laertes heard of his father's death he left for Denmark, rallied up some followers, and marched past the King's guards to the Royal Court and demanded an answer. "O thou vile King, give me my father," Laertes bellowed at the King. Claudius relays to Laertes that Hamlet is to blame and once again…
- 850 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet's response to grief is a trait starkly contrasted by Laertes. Laertes response to the death of his father is immediate. He is publicly angry, and he leads the public riot occurring…
- 1323 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Once Laertes discovers that his father has been killed, he assumes immediately that the killer must be Claudius. An effect of his speculation is his instinctive desire to retaliate against Polonius's murderer. He says, "To hell, allegiance! Vows, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit! I dare damnation. To this point I stand, that both worlds I give to negligence, let come what comes. Only I'll be revenged most thoroughly for my father" (4.5. 128-134). This excerpt provides insight into his mind and shows his thirst for revenge at any cost. In contrast to Laertes’s belief of his father's killer, Hamlet assumes that the individual eavesdropping on the conversation he has with Gertrude is Claudius, and he says, "Nay, I know not: is it the King?" (3.4.28). Consequently, Hamlet is consumed with rage and automatically thrusts out with his sword in an attempt to kill Claudius but strikes Polonius instead. Hamlet's and Laertes's spontaneous actions are incited by fury and frustration. Sudden bursts of anger prompt both Laertes and Hamlet to act rashly, and they end up giving little thought to the consequences of their actions. But while both characters have the desire to avenge their father’s murders, only Laertes has any real resolve to take real…
- 890 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Hamlet, Laertes is “passion’s slave” (III.ii.67); instead of acting on reason, Laertes acts on his emotions, disregarding any of the moral principles that Hamlet weighs heavily.…
- 1081 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Both their fathers were of the higher class and their deaths each rooted from political conflicts. Laertes act of a foil character to Hamlet emphasizes his cowardly actions. His actions after the death of his father are more justified than Hamlets. He took action right away in order to seek revenge. Unlike Hamlet who waited too long to get the revenge his father had wanted him to get. Hamlet mostly waited for karma to take its place and do what was right. He cowardly thought about suicide a few times during the play. “to be or not to be, that is the question”…
- 905 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Laertes’ issues with Hamlet begin as mostly minor, where he attempts to dissuade Ophelia from succumbing to Hamlet’s romantic approaches, telling her, “For Hamlet and the trifling of his favor... [it is] forward, not permanent, sweet, nor lasting, the perfume and suppliance of a minute. No more” (I.iii. 5-10). He does end up creating more problems for Hamlet than he had originally intended, or even possibly realized, by taking away that which he most desired, in the form of Ophelia, which influences many of Hamlet’s actions throughout the play. As the story progresses, though, Laertes’ importance grows when he challenges Claudius’ right to the throne by accusing him of his father’s murder. Claudius is innocent, and able to convince Laertes of this, and postpones any immediate attempts for the throne. This aids the beginning of their alliance, which prompts Laertes’ most devastating action towards Hamlet, the duel. This duel demonstrates just how desperate Laertes and Claudius both are to be rid of Hamlet, as both risk sacrificing their honor and honesty to ensure his death. The duel also serves to demonstrate the lesson that quests for vengeance tend to hurt all involved, as well as the common expression “death is the great equalizer”…
- 455 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Laertes and Hamlet both display impulsive reactions when angered. Once Laertes discovers his father has been murdered, he immediately assumes the slayer is Claudius. As a result of Laertes' speculation, he instinctively moves to avenge Polonius' death. "To hell, allegiance! Vows, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit! I dare damnation: to this point I stand, that both worlds I give to negligence, let come what comes; only I'll be revenged most thoroughly for my father." (IV, v, 128-134) These lines provide insight into Laertes' mind, displaying his desire for revenge at any cost.…
- 816 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Shakespeare’s revenge tragedy Hamlet was composed in the early 17th century Elizabethan Era, reflecting this society’s preoccupation with retribution and vengeance. It explores key concerns and concepts of everlasting relevance to audiences of all ages. The tragic hero Hamlet is intensely human and his struggles are familiar to all audiences. He educates the audience via vicarious learning, sharing his experiences as he explores fundamental issues of morality and mortality through his intense interactions with the lead female characters. Key concerns that are the driving forces in Hamlet include: deception and revenge. These overarching concerns help the audience to understand the prevarications and motivations of Hamlet, along with the multifaceted relationships between Hamlet, Ophelia, Gertrude and Claudius.…
- 726 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet did not consider revenge until the Ghost told him to "revenge this most foul and unnatural murder". (1.5) Even then, Hamlet took action slowly, carefully and deliberately planning out the steps of his plan with which to get revenge. Laertes, however, upon hearing of his father's death, returned to Denmark, smashing the doors to the Elsinore castle open, demanding that the "vile king" should "give (him his) father". (4.5) Their moral compasses, too, are exceedingly different. Hamlet had had the opportunity to murder Claudius while Claudius was praying, but chose not to, thinking that if he killed Claudius then, he would "this same villain send to heaven", showing that he still believes in a higher power, and demands that justice be paid. (3.3) Conversely, Laertes, when asked by Claudius what he would do to prove that he was "in deed (his) father's son more than in words", Laertes stated that he would "cut his throat i' th' church". (4.7) Through this comparison, it may be seen that while Hamlet is uncertain about committing murder to avenge another murder, Laertes has no hesitation about…
- 1750 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Although his unfavorable situation is very similar to Hamlet’s, he is completely controlled by the thoughts of revenge. As he talks to Claudius, who wants to utilize him to get rid of Hamlet, Laertes got too much anger built up in his mind to stay calm. At this point, all Laertes wants to do is only to “eliminate” Hamlet immediately, “To cut his throat i' th' church” (p. 193), like treating a feud. Laertes’ behavior is caused by the unexpectedly death of his father and the sudden mad of his sister. Moreover, Claudius wants a person who is strong enough to compete with Hamlet. He knows Laertes is the one that he is looking for, so he asks him to “put me in your heart for friend” (p.187), rekindles his rage, and tells him that they should share the weal and woe and stay on the same line to confront Hamlet. Laertes is affected by Claudius’ “combustion”, which further turns him a terrible monster to revenge for his father. Unlike Hamlet, Laertes is “passionate and quick to action” (Sparknotes Editors) and has no state of mind. He indiscriminately sees Hamlet as an enemy and Claudius as a friend, without considering the causes and consequences of his father’s death. Although Hamlet is somewhat hesitant, he thinks about what he does and always sticks to his…
- 1009 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play Hamlet, William Shakespeare writes of a tragedy in which Hamlet and Laertes both face the same problem-a murdered father. The paths of revenge that each of them take, parallel their characters and personalities throughout the play. While Hamlet broods over the murder of his father for the majority of the play, Laertes takes immediate action, and upon hearing about the death of his father, he rushes in and is ready to kill Claudius-whom he suspects has killed his father.…
- 1261 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays