Preview

Theodicy Vs Moral Evil

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1138 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theodicy Vs Moral Evil
Why does one question Gods doing and what evil is being done that He allows to occur? Theodicy, or the problem of evil is what raises many eyebrows and how one defines theodicy. Theodicy is the attempt to prove the existence of God. Its first know use is dated back to 1797. According to Michael Coren, a truly good God would make it easier, inevitable, and unavoidable for all to follow and find our way to heaven. Even though the existence of moral evil is not consistent with the existence of God. God allows evil to exist because He allows us to be free. What we do to create such evil is completely up to us and God does not have control over our actions because this is how He made us. Even though many may question’s Gods abilities in vain or …show more content…
The many kinds of evil are all categorized differently such as moral evil and natural evil. The difference between natural evil and moral evil is how they were caused, either by being or nature. Moral evil is brought by man conducting wars, torture, rape, murder, meaningless violence, etc. As opposed to natural evil, natural evil is caused by nature such as diseases, earthquakes, floods, tsunamis, etc. These such evils do not subject to one species but to ALL species. You also have intellectual evil and emotional evil. While intellectual problem of evil is the rational explanation to why God and evil co-exist. Emotional problem of evil disintegrates individuals emotional dislike of God’s permit to suffering. As to why God permits suffering is to be questioned with motives and great …show more content…
To prosper with such knowledge and the love God has for us. If God hadn’t created free agents, we wouldn’t live in the world we live in today. God created the free agents so we wouldn’t live in a world of automata or no conscious beings at all. Allowing his beings to be free agents to do as they please, which means because God allows this he is all allowing the risk of moral evil to enter the world. Even though God created free agents who conduct moral evil God is not responsible for moral evil. Moral evil is brought into the world by free agents, not by God. If God hadn’t created free will agents there wouldn’t be goodness. Therefore, God should be praised for creating free
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Theology 202 Essay 1
    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Theology 202 Essay 1

    First, natural and moral evil need to be distinguished from one another. Natural evil is defined as “evil which occurs in the process of the functioning of the natural order.” People are not responsible for these happenings; they are simply the victims and no one is to blame. The devastation that resulted from Hurricane Sandy is a perfect example of such evil, along with other problems such as cancer and earthquakes. Moral evil, on the other hand, is defined as “evil produced by activities of moral agents.” This evil stems from intentional action, such as murder, stealing, and adultery. Natural evil is part of the consequences of moral evil that resulted from the fall of man in the Garden of Eden.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    augustine on free choice of the will book 1
    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    augustine on free choice of the will book 1

    Evil can be used in two ways- when someone has done evil and when someone has suffered evil. Since God is good, God does no moral evil; however, because God is just, God punishes the wicked and thus causes the evil of punishment. People are the cause of their own evildoing. Furthermore, because learning is good a thing, we do not learn evil. It is people’s inordinate desires that drive their evildoings.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    A comparison of Augustinian Theodicy and Irenaean Theodicy
    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A comparison of Augustinian Theodicy and Irenaean Theodicy

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Problem of EvilSaint Leo University
    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Problem of EvilSaint Leo University

    Religious folk claim that God is all-benevolent. If this is the case, then why is evil permitted to exist? When faced with this question, believers state that evil exists to promote “the greater good”. The greater good is the idea that some pain and suffering must exist in the world for us as humans to access our second and third level “good” platforms. These levels consist of human qualities such as courageousness, charity and sacrifice. Believers claim that life would not be as good, or as whole, without knowing these feelings, however, I argue that if we never knew any of the “higher level” qualities, then we wouldn’t miss them. If, from the beginning, we only knew the first level good, and knew no pain and suffering, then we wouldn’t know any different. Could it not be a better life, a better world, with absolutely no pain, suffering or evil? So, the question remains, if God is wholly good then how does evil exist? It is possible that God is not completely good, it may be that He permits some evil to exist so we can reach our “greater goods.” On the opposing side of that theory, is it actually that there may not be a God and that evil is a product of our human nature, as well as the good in the world.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Free Will Argument Against Moral Evil
    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Free Will Argument Against Moral Evil

    There exist two types of evils: moral evils and natural evils. Moral evils are terrible events within human’s control. The terrorists’ slaughter in Paris, for example, is a moral evil. The terrorists could have chosen not to shoot innocent people. Natural evils, on the other hand, are terrible events happen outside human beings’ control. Earthquake for example, is a natural evil. There’s no way we can let it happen or not.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mackie and the Problem of Evil
    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mackie and the Problem of Evil

    Logical Solution to the Problem of Evil: either God has limited power and cannot prevent evil, God has limited goodness and doesn’t want to prevent evil, or evil doesn’t exist –> requires one to abandon the traditional concept of God as all-good and all-powerful or maintain the highly unrealistic view that there really is no evil…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    George Elwell The Problem Of Evil
    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    George Elwell The Problem Of Evil

    There are different types of evil that are allowed in this world. The first is moral evil, which began in the garden of Eden when Eve ate the fruit off the tree and deliberately disobeyed God in an act of sin and evil (Gen. 3)(Elwell, pg 412). The next is natural evil; this is explained mainly in natural disasters such as, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and disease. Elwell writes, “natural evil is the consequence of moral evil,” then goes onto explain that natural evil is not distinct…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain the Problem of Evil
    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the Problem of Evil

    The problem of evil refers to the nature of God. Many assume that God is benevolent but hardly anyone really considers the possibility that God is not all good but rather an all evil, malevolent God. The question is if God is all good and all powerful, then why did he create a world full of evil and suffering? There is so much suffering in this world that a lot of people find it hard to believe that, if God does exist, he is good. There is the argument that an all good, all powerful God would create some suffering in the world to perhaps allow people to achieve greater goods. However, in all honesty, there is more evil than good in the world and so the likely hood of that isn’t very high. So in order to explain the nature of the problem of evil, then one has to consider the possibility of an evil God as well as a benevolent one. Is God willing to prevent evil, but unable to? Is God able to prevent evil, but unwilling to do so? Or is God able to prevent evil and willing to?…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Evil and Suffering Rs
    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Evil and Suffering Rs

    There are two different types of evil. Moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is the result of human actions that are morally wrong. Examples are murder, war and cruelty. Richard Swinburn said 'Moral evil I understand as including all evil caused deliberately by humans negligently failing to do what they ought to do, and also the evil constituted by such deliberate actions or negligent failure'. Natural evil is not caused by humans, and it is the apparent malfunctioning of the natural world. Examples of this are volcanoes erupting, earthquakes, famines, and diseases. John Hick said 'Natural evil is the evil that originates independently of human actions, in disease… in earthquakes, storms, droughts, or tornadoes'.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Free Will Response To The Problem Of Evil
    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Free Will Response To The Problem Of Evil

    Others say that free will is not the cause for evil because God has foreknowledge. However, even if God does know everything before it happens, this does not mean he forces us to take those actions and takes away our free will. First, the problem of evil is the attempt to understand why…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

    This higher power, God, has now been brought down to a human position. Perhaps it is in vain to do this to make the idea more alluring or comforting, the exact opposite of pain and evil. Philo mentions that you cannot give God words such as merciful or benevolent if this being is an entity that is more powerful than a human at its best. Clean and clear, evil is equally as related to God as merciful is making it essentially useless to base morality on God’s decision…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Problem Of Evil: Theodicy
    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Problem Of Evil: Theodicy

    The definitions of evil consist of moral evil, which is bad evil and natural evil which is harmful evil. Moral evils are violations of the…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Evil Vs Natural Evil
    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Moral Evil Vs Natural Evil

    But couldn't God have created a world without evil? Let's take a look at a few of the options. If God had not created anything, there would be no evil. But is nothing better than something? Hardly. This would be a world without morality. What if God created a world where people could not choose? God could force everyone to stop before they were able to carry out evil behaviour. But is such a world where freedom does not exist good?…

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Evil Vs Natural Evil
    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moral Evil Vs Natural Evil

    Let’s look at western’s thoughts on evil. There are two types of evil, moral, and natural evil. Moral evil is all things that are bad and we hold morally responsible, and Natural Evil are those terrible things that happen naturally. An example of natural evil are hurricanes, tornados, sink holes and floods, because they all occur naturally which is out of our hands. Both cause human and animal suffrage which both are prevalent in are world.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theodicy Questions For Research Paper
    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Theodicy Questions For Research Paper

    In our growth as Christians, we will learn that there are many questions we must face in order to gain proper understanding about God. One such question asks, “If God is omnipotent (all powerful), why is there suffering and evil in the world?” It is also known as the Theodicy question. This a question that many Christians struggle with. However the Bible does provide some answers as to why God allows evil to exist. Christian Theologians throughout the ages have also provided some insight into the theodicy. I have very little experience on how to answer this. My life has been very sheltered, and I haven’t experiences true suffering. Much of my reasoning comes from the guidance of the Bible. Several reasons for suffering and evil include God giving us free will to choose, using evil to remind us about the broken world we live in, and using evil to draw us closer to him.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics