Preview

Theories of Corporate Governance

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1306 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theories of Corporate Governance
Theories of Corporate Governance
The philosophical foundations of corporate governance

Edited by Thomas Clarke

Contents

Preface Acknowledgements ‘Introduction: Theories of Governance – Reconceptualizing Corporate Governance Theory After the Enron Experience’ Thomas Clarke PART 1 ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS

ix xi 1

31 34 45

‘The Managerial Revolution in American Business’ Alfred D. Chandler Jr ‘The Impact of the Corporation on Classical Economic Theory’ Adolf A. Berle PART 2 AGENCY THEORY

55 58 64 78

‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’ Michael C. Jensen and William H. Meckling ‘Separation of Ownership and Control’ Eugene F. Fama and Michael C. Jensen ‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review’ Kathleen M. Eisenhardt PART 3 MANAGERIAL HEGEMONY

93 96 108

‘Directors: Myth and Reality’ Myles L. Mace ‘Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards’ Jay W. Lorsch and Elizabeth MacIver PART 4 STEWARDSHIP THEORY

115 118

‘Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management’ James H. Davis, F. David Schoorman and Lex Donaldson

vi

C O NTE NTS

PART 5

EXTERNAL PRESSURES

135 138

‘The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change’ Amy J. Hillman, Albert A. Cannella Jr and Ramona L. Paetzold ‘Institutional and Strategic Choice Perspectives on Board Involvement in the Strategic Decision Process’ William Q. Judge Jr and Carl P. Zeithaml ‘A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms’ Candace Jones, William S. Hesterly and Stephen P. Borgatti

149

159

PART 6

STAKEHOLDER THEORY

171

‘Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty-First Century’ Margaret M. Blair ‘The Stakeholder Corporation: A Business Philosophy for the Information Age’ Thomas Clarke

174 189

PART 7

THEORIES OF CONVERGENCE

203 206

‘Corporate Leadership

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    finance 340 exam study guide

    • 2722 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In the corporate form of ownership, the shareholders are the owners of the firm. The shareholders elect the directors of the corporation, who in turn appoint the firm’s management. This separation of ownership from control in the corporate form of organization is what causes agency problems to exist. Management may act in its own or someone else’s best interests, rather than those of the shareholders. If such events occur, they may contradict the goal of maximizing the share price of the equity of the firm.…

    • 2722 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.…

    • 2215 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit I HW MBA5101

    • 521 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Boards of Directors have many roles and responsibilities, none of which should be taken lightly and all directly impact the success or failure of the company (Wheelen, 2010). Some of these…

    • 521 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The failure of the Enron Corporation in the late 2001, apart from signaling the largest corporate bankruptcy in the USA, has raised several questions about the effectiveness of the contemporary accounting, auditing, and corporate governance practices. The committee followed all the rules that were put in place by the board. “However, it is said that the audit committee deserves much of the blame for Enron’s collapse and the corporate governance movement deserves much of the blame for the Enron audit committee. Governance experts say the audit committee’s lack of independence made it less inclined to question management.” (Lavelle, 2002). Businesses collapsing, like Enron, can be prevented. “Those executives can be criminally penalized for misleading auditors. For a successful corporate governance, board members should be properly inducted, trained and developed. The pros and cons of different types of corporate governance need to be explored and best practice disseminated. There needs to be more company sponsored practical researcher on governance, rather than the black box it often is at present.” (Vinten,…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hrm in Business Context

    • 2946 Words
    • 12 Pages

    * Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978), The external control of organisations: a resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper and Row.…

    • 2946 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Jensen, MC and Meckling, WH,(1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.3, No. 4.…

    • 2526 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Keywords Directors, Ethics, Responsibility, Corporate governance Abstract The failure of the Enron Corporation has brought attention to the roles played by the chief executive officer and other executives of the modern corporation. Its failure has also produced discussion of further regulations that will, it is hoped, prevent another collapse similar to that of Enron. This article argues that the central reason for Enron’s crash was not a lack of regulations or the deceptions of executives but rather a failure of the board of directors of Enron to function in a morally and ethically responsible manner.…

    • 3525 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shareholder Value

    • 14475 Words
    • 58 Pages

    We wish to thank Nancy Macmillan for the great editorial help. We received many valuable…

    • 14475 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stewardship Theory

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stewardship theory has its roots in psychology and sociology and was designed for researchers to examine situations in which executives as stewards are motivated to act in the best interests of their principals (Donaldson & Davis, 1989, 1991). In stewardship theory, the model of man is based on a steward whose behavior is ordered such that proorganizational, coUectivistic behaviors have higher utility than individualistic, self:serving behaviors. Given a choice between self-serving behavior and pro-organizational behavior, a steward's behavior will not depart from the interests of his or her organization. A steward will not substitute or trade self-serving behaviors for cooperative behaviors.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Table 2: The data of financial statement from the Nestle Company from 2008 to 2010…

    • 12221 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shareholder Theory

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Separation thesis is rejected and argued over the fact that profits are a critical part of business, but concern for profits is the result rather than the driver in the process of value creation. It’s also known that shareholders are a part of shareholders. In shareholder’s view, the managers have more resources and greater deal of challenge, as they offer not only financial rewards, but language and action to show that they value relationship. The theory also says that the process of creating value for shareholders along with stakeholders by not only relying on shareholder but also customers and suppliers. Some examples of successful implications of stakeholder theory are J&J, eBay; Google etc. provide compelling examples of how managers understand the core insights of stakeholder theory and use them to create outstanding business.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    and fraud. In this study, these traditional measures of governance are found to have little impact.…

    • 14387 Words
    • 126 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    audting

    • 2350 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Bodman Philip and Crosby Mark(2002), The Australian Business Cycle: Australian Economic Papers, pp191 – 196…

    • 2350 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company directors are like the shepherds who always try to convince the sheep that their interests and his are one and the same. Alolf Berle and Gardiner Means in Modern Corporation and Private Property cast an aura of suspicion over managerialism in companies characterized by a separation of ownership and control. They contended that in modern corporations, managers decide how a corporation’s capital is spent, how resources are allocated and what endeavours are undertaken by the company but do not themselves own the capital or resources. Experts in corporate and securities law, management consulting and academia have wrestled with reconciling the divergent interests of those who own corporations and those who control them. The corporate scandals - ENRON (2001), WORLDCOM (2002), Vivendi (2002) and Tyco (2002) - have shown that there are unresolved tensions. Whilst at the banquet of statutory protection, shareholders and creditors feast on regulation protecting their interests in the company, be it solvent or insolvent. Labour is noticeably absent. Whilst the commercial realities indicate that maintaining good relations with creditors, suppliers, customers and workers are all important parts of maximizing profitability, directors do not owe a fiduciary duty to these corporate constituencies. The novel stakeholder ideology challenges the stockholder dogma which pervades corporate management structures, finding expression in regional company laws. This paper analyses the statutory duty of corporate directors, the intricacies of the relationship between the company and the employees thereof, and whether in light of the apparent deficient companies’…

    • 6405 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ghoshal

    • 12106 Words
    • 49 Pages

    [Originally published in Evaluation Studies Review Annual (1984): 26 – 48.] Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Clegg, S. R., & Ross-Smith, A. 2003. Revising the boundaries: Management education and learning in a postpositivist world. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(1): 85–98. Coleman, J. S. 1992. The rational reconstruction of society. American Sociological Review, 58: Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioural theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 371–382. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 269 –290. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22: 20 – 47.…

    • 12106 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Powerful Essays