Preview

Theories Of Mercantilism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1109 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theories Of Mercantilism
The colonial empire grew prior to 1740 due to Mercantilism, these colonies economic policies were guided by this one theory. The chief objective of the nations economic poloicies was to serve the state. Mercantilism was developed to facilitate the consoloidation of the new European nation-states. This recquired great amounts of money to support their growing military. Mercantilists considered the economy and politics as zero-sum games; one side’s gain was another’s loss. This essay will reveal to you how mercantilists used mercantilism to basically conquer others, and gain/take as much money as they could before 1740. You will learn how the nation uses mercantilism as a motivation source. During this essay we are goingto be discussing all …show more content…
The colonies became an important part of mercantilism even though they didn’t have a great quantity of gold and silver as they hoped. Englands raw materials were limited but the colonies were full of all kinds of resources that England needed. New England provided timber and ships, Wheats from the middle colonies fed England’s rapidly growing population. Down in the south there were vast supplies of indigo , tobacco, and other crops you can sell/trade. The best part of it is that England could get all of these things without having to pay for them in actual cash, they would simply get them through triangular trade. British goods were traded for slaves on the Afrian coast, these africans were shipped to America and traded for the raw …show more content…
As we spoke about during class there were many different colonists, some were great some only lasted as rulers for short periods of time, or shorter than they have planned. The different strategies and techniques these colonists is distinguished them as great or just another mediocre colonist. In 1661 Penn was founded by William Penn, during his ruling Penn practiced religous freedom, economic freedom. He also purchased land from Indians so it wasn’t a fight for the land he purchased rights to it. These characteristics brung in many settlers, and you know more people equals more money being made as well as being spent in this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    England gets many advantages like they were able to get natural assets and products to trade that generally would have been occupied to them. Also that it expanded the size of their country and made them all the more capable. This is regularly portrayed by the term merchantilism, which implied that provinces existed solely with the end goal of profiting the homeland. Furthermore England wanted to get a couple profits by making provinces. The fundamental advantages were cash; spices, furs and turn out to be more powerful. Basically the colonies give economic advantages to England through cultivating, trade, and buying. By ranchers settling on the choice to cultivate in an outside nation their land and what they…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economies of the colonies of Massachusetts and Virginia were centered around different resources, but each colony flourished in its own way. Virginia centered around the fact that land was plentiful, but labor was scarce. Many landowners had large portions of land but not enough workers to cultivate it. In Massachusetts, the land was not fertile so their economy centered around the fishing and ship making industries. Therefore, Massachusetts’s most profitable resources were timber and fishing. Land was less fertile in Massachusetts due to the harsh climate and short growing season. One thing that helped Massachusetts economy was that they could also take out the “middle man” when trading by using their own ships and merchants. Due to the fertile land in Virginia, their most profitable resource was tobacco. Virginia’s land was fertile due to the warm climate and immense rainfall. Virginia had plenty of staples to exchange for English goods. The Massachusetts colony had a lack of staples for exchange,…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    …but in the process of mercantilism, colonial manufacturing was prohibited; colonial currency was manipulated; colonial trade was regulated; colonial expansion was prevented; and colonial markets were threatened by British monopolies. (Historian C, O'Reilly).…

    • 2621 Words
    • 75 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parliament passed the Currency Act of 1764 which terminated the making of paper money for the colonies. Colonist were subjected to only use gold and silver. But there wasn’t any gold or silver mines in America which caused a shortage of currency. So the only way the colonist could obtain gold and silver is to trade with England. This was only to ensure a profit for themselves. The Currency Act threatened to destabilize the colonial economy. Another act passed by Parliament that helped destabilize the economy was the Mutiny Act of 1765. The Mutiny Act restricted some of the manufacturing in the colonies, making some of the colonist lose their jobs and forcing America to trade with England. “One of the most essential branches of English liberty…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 4 Focus Questions

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some factors that contributed to the prosperity of British colonies were the dethroning of King James II, mercantilism, population growth, and expansion. The crowning of William and Mary opened up a new era for the colonists. William dismantled the Dominion of New England and brought back self-governing colonies rather than crown appointed governors. Mercantilism helped further develop England’s economy. Mercantilism maximized sales while minimizing foreign purchase. The colonies wouldn’t purchase things from other nations but they would encourage other nations to buy from them. Mercantilism became the commercial economy of England. The income produced from mercantilism enhanced commerce. All the colonies had a population growth, not from immigration but from natural increase. In the early 1700s, England expanded many of their colonies like Delaware. England also spread their empire south to Georgia. Georgia became a refugee for debtors to work off their debts.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sugar Dbq

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In document twelve it informs us that that England passed a whole series of laws dealing with colonial shipping, trade, and the money in 1660. They made this laws so it could make or help the mother country to improve it. By this law the England could buy their material at a very low price. Which also the countries had to send material to them especially the popular product which was the sugar cane. The English would make many new material with the supplies they got which then they would sell the material at a higher price to the other countries and especially England. England had a balance trade which by this more gold and silver came to England which led England to national…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Mercantilism

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Great Britain imposed the mercantilist ideals on the 13 American colonies in the 17th century with one single purpose, creating wealth for itself, which equaled to military and political power. Britain did that by implementing various policies and acts, regulating the trade and production of the colonies. Generally, mercantilism caused more harm than good in the political and economic developments of the colonies. The colonial economy was greatly affected in a negative light and while the colonies was under political control of England, resentment arose, which was one of the factors contributed to the Revolution in…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Artisans: Although artisans produced many beautiful and necessary goods, such as clothes, cooking utensils, and woodblock prints, they were considered less important than the farmers. Even skilled samurai sword makers and boatwrights belonged to this third tier of society in feudal Japan. The artisan class lived in its own section of the major cities, segregated from the samurai (who usually lived in the daimyos' castles), and from the lower merchant class.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tobacco, the ultimate American cash crop at the time, was Jamestown’s salvation and soon, many colonies way of getting money by trading it. There were also many other valuable goods that were involved in international trade, sugar as sugar and rum (that was involved in the Triangular trade). As quoted in American Firsthand from Adriaen Van Der Donck (pg. 36), “I have heretofore embraced several opportunities” in the New Netherlands. Also, slavery was key in the colonies. Slaves from Africa and hard labor brought colonists, mostly in the South, great opportunities to become rich and to participate in trade with Europe and Africa.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Mercantilism

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is also an example of mercantilism. These trades were between the st Salvador,French and British territory.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trans-Atlantic Trade

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The role of trans-Atlantic trade and Great Britain’s mercantilist policies in the economic development of the British North American colonies in the period from 1650 to 1750 was to create the colonies into self-sufficient areas of living. Triangular trade within the United States, Great Britain, the West Indies, and Africa helped to distribute and/or import and export essential factors. The theory of mercantilism is “that a state should be as economically self-sufficient as possible” and it stipulates that in order to build economic strength, a nation must export more than it imports. The mercantilist policies of Great Britain were rules and regulations that every country and colony participating in the trans-Atlantic trade had to abide by. These rules helped build a firm ground for those countries and colonies, like the British North American colonies that were trying to become financially dependent on themselves.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Great Britain managed to establish itself as the most economically powerful country in Europe from 1700 to 1830 by perfecting its implementation of mercantilism. One very important aspect for any mercantilist country to have is a strong naval force to allow for easy trade. If there is a strong navy, the country can expand and acquire colonies which are invaluable according to mercantilist theory. A third aspect that aids in building a countries economical power is the development of industry within the nation. Britain used all three aspects to facilitate its economic rise to power from 1700 to 1830.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mercantilism and Colonies

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The army is there to prevent other countries to trade with some mother countries’ colony.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mercantilism was an economic theory that was current between about 1550 and 1760. First, it stated that wealth can be created only by trading between nations, using the products in which each has a special advantage. The second feature formed the principle behind colonialism because it stated that an increase in the wealth of one country must cause a reduction of wealth in others. By deduction, for "civilised" European countries to become richer, countries in Africa, Asia and America will need to provide their materials as minimum cost. The classic examples used at the time were South American silver and Oriental spices. Mercantilism was apologetic for the plundering of "primitive societies" but it was adopted by most thinkers and politicians, and by the Roman Catholic church. It became clear by the late 1600s that China and India were not primitive societies, and that mercantilist principles were at risk of damaging those large communities, but for a time no one could devise an alternative theory of wealth creation.Adam Smith in his book "The Wealth of Nations" [1776] showed that wealth can be created by other means and that trade could in fact cause a reduction in domestic wealth if certain conditions are not met. Smith and David Hume are regarded as the principal critics of mercantilism in the 18th century.By the end of the 18th century, mercantilism was used as a term of abuse or insult on economic theories that were out of date, or had been superseded by the wealth creation possibilities of the industrial revolution. It became clear that wealth can be created domestically, without trade, if an economy is self sufficient in the essentials of human life and if there is a ready supply of raw materials. By 1800, almost no one accepted mercantilist theory.There was a short resurgence of mercantilism in USA in the 1840s and 1850s, after the bimetallism debate and whilst slavery was still important to agricultural production. The southern states espoused a…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    British Colonial State

    • 7299 Words
    • 30 Pages

    14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 Introduction Nature of the Colonial State The Political Economy of the Colonial State . Instmments of Control…

    • 7299 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays