Preview

Theory of Justice

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1209 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theory of Justice
The theory of justice is a work of political philosophy and ethics by John Rawls. According to Gomez, philosopher John Rawls who lived between 1921- 2002, argued the notion of social justice as fairness in his book "A Theory of Justice." He used foundations of utilitarian and Kantian philosophy to create a possible technique to estimate the ethics of social and political institutions. The principles of justice theories was Rawls 's theory and it is dependent on two important and central principles of social justice that, according to Rawls, assures a just and morally acceptable society. The first principle of social justice states “every person has a right to the most basic liberties, same as any other person who has a right to the same liberties.” The second principle of social justice states “all people should have access to the same social and economic positions and be able to take advantage of them”. According to Areson, utilitarianism is the principle Rawls reputes as the most difficult form and type of teleology, which he describes as a theory that not only expresses the good as independent from the right but states and identifies the right while maximizing the good. Utilitarianism usually is taken as a theory of justice and holds that “society is rightly ordered, and therefore just, when its major institutions are arranged so as to achieve the greatest net balance of satisfaction summed over all the individuals belonging to it”. Rawls argues that utilitarianism discounts the separateness and clearness of persons and does not recognize that justice is what free persons would choose as the principles to order or control their social cooperation under terms and situations that are fair.
The virtue of caution involves an individual to be impartial in making decisions that affect all of the times of her life. A benefit at one time should count the same as an identical benefit that could instead be gained at another time, and the same with losses. Rawls


Cited: Areson, Richard. "What Is RAWLS SOCIAL JUSTICE THEORY?" What Is RAWLS SOCIAL JUSTICE THEORY? N.p., Fall 2008. Web. 20 Apr. 2013. <http://mrwhatis.com/rawls-social-justice-theory.html>. Gomez, Vivian. "John Rawls Theory of Social Justice." EHow. Demand Media, 04 Nov. 2010. Web. 20 Apr. 2013. <http://www.ehow.com/facts_7446222_john-rawls-theory-social-justice.html>. Malone, Marita. "Professional Perspectives » Archive » Criminal Justice & Security Management: The Merging of Previously Separate Fields." Professional Perspectives » Archive » Criminal Justice & Security Management: The Merging of Previously Separate Fields. N.p., 20 Mar. 2010. Web. 21 Apr. 2013. <http://www.slu.edu/blogs/sps-faculty/2010/03/20/criminal-justice-security-management-the-merging-of-previously-separate-fields/>. Staib, Michael. "What Is Criminal Justice?" EHow. Demand Media, 04 June 2009. Web. 20 Apr. 2013. <http://www.ehow.com/about_5070188_criminal-justice.html>.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs Arizona
    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Miranda vs Arizona

    2. Schmallager, F. (2011). Criminal justice today: An introductory text for the 21st century (11th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson/Prentice Hall Retrieved 4/17/2013…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    eco health and edu
    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    eco health and edu

    words but no more than 600 words in length which discusses the social justice implications of…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    John Rawls and Robert Nozick
    • 3081 Words
    • 13 Pages

    John Rawls and Robert Nozick

    John Rawls theory is called Justice as Fairness and was published in Rawls book A Theory of Justice in 1971. The theory is divided into two principles; however Rawls has arranged the principles in order of priority, so as if the two principles were to ever clash then the first principle would take precedent over the second, “These principles are to be arranged in a…

    • 3081 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Two Main Principles of Rawls’ Theory of the Original Position
    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Two Main Principles of Rawls’ Theory of the Original Position

    The Original Position is Rawls’ conception of justice, which would set up rules that an ideal society would abide by in order for justice to be fairly distributed amongst each member of the society. In order for fair and equal opportunities to be allowed to each individual, Rawls believes that a society must first start out with each member in an initial position of equality, under what he terms ‘a Veil of Ignorance.’ This veil would ensure that nobody knows their position in society, and that everybody is ignorant to specific details regarding race, class, religion and economic standing. Each person would be provided with only the basic details of how the society is structured. (Rawls, A Liberal Theory of Justice, pp 578, para 1.) Such a veil of ignorance, Rawls believes, would encourage each person to be rational and mutually disinterested when choosing the rules of society, and because nobody knows which position they would be in when the veil is lifted, an individual would…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Rawls' Maximin Principle
    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rawls' Maximin Principle

    Rawls argues that the most reasonable principles of justice are those everyone would accept and agree to from a fair position. These principles determine a society's basic structure; political constitution, economy, and property rules. Rawls takes a fair agreement situation to be one where everyone is impartially situated as equals. In this so-called "original position" everyone is equally situated by a hypothetical "veil of ignorance". This veil requires individuals to set aside their knowledge of their particular differences, including knowledge of their talents, wealth, social position, and religious views. People in the original position are rational; they desire a set of primary goods and they know and understand general laws and principles that govern a society . Rawls asserts that in the hypothetical original position everyone would unanimously accept justice as fairness. This conception of justice consists mainly of two principles, the second of which is most imperative and will be discussed in great detail.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Utilitarianism Versus Rawls Versus Nozick
    • 2479 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Utilitarianism Versus Rawls Versus Nozick

    Utilitarianism is the moral philosophy that the morally right action is that which leads to the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. The term justice means getting what you deserve both good and bad. However there is significant disagreement between justice theorists as to what causes who to deserve what. In this essay I will be discussing John Rawls' concept of contract justice and Robert Nozick's concept of justice as entitlement. All political theories can be said to benefit some groups in society more than other and so there are winners and losers to all political philosophies.…

    • 2479 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Original Position
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Rawls Original Position

    In John Rawls’ social contract account of justice, “justice as fairness,” in A Theory of Justice, the original position is a central feature. The original point is set to be adopted in the way we reason about the fundamental principles of justice, and need to be fair and an impartial view thereof. Once we take up this point of view, we step into the role of free and equal persons who all agree and commit themselves to certain principles of political and social justice. “The veil of ignorance” is the main distinguishing feature and it insures impartial judgement by depriving the parties of all knowledge of their personal characteristics and historical and social circumstances. The fundamental interests they have will be known, as well as general facts about biology, psychology, economics and other natural and social sciences. The parties in the original position will be assigned to choose the conception of justice that best motivates their interests in established conditions that help them pursue their fundamental interests and goals in the list of alternatives of main ideas of justice, which is taken from the tradition of social and political philosophy. The most rational choice for everyone in the original position, says Rawls, is one of the two principles of justice.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Is the principle of fairness a sound moral principle? Reflection on John Rawls’ theory.
    • 2311 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Is the principle of fairness a sound moral principle? Reflection on John Rawls’ theory.

    John Rawls’s theory of justice was an answer to the twentieth-century liberal philosophy. Criticising the liberal approach Rawls decided to reconstruct the idea of social contract1 and use it as a starting point for studying the concept of justice. He did not aim to propose the best political system possible. He rather asked about the rules, the basis for the human activities which could guarantee the existence of justice. Therefore, he developed the principle of fairness. Its major aim was to constitute the necessary conditions for providing ‘an acceptable philosophical and moral basis for democratic institutions’2 and in this way to enable the achievement and maintenance of justice. However, it will not be the Rawls’s principles of justice forming the interest of this work. I will concentrate on the pure concept of fairness, try to reconstruct its major components, examine its characteristics and finally decide if the principle of fairness can be treated as a sound moral principle.…

    • 2311 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    veil of ignorance
    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages

    veil of ignorance

    In John Rawls' A Theory of Justice, he argues that morally, society should be constructed politically as if we were all behind a veil of ignorance; that is, the rules and precepts of society should be constructed as if we had no prior knowledge of our future wealth, talents, and social status, and could be placed in any other person's societal position (Velasquez, 2008). Through this, Rawls believes that people will create a system of “justice as fairness” because their lack of knowledge regarding who they are will prevent them from arranging a society that would benefit those in their position at the expense of others. Rawls’ has designed his theory of the original position as a hypothetical social contract (Freeman, 2012). As we do not live in a well-ordered society that the hypothetical contract is based on, Rawls’ theory and position is flawed and it is an implausible conception of justice. Rawls’ theory of justice and the veil of ignorance cannot be effectively and practically executed in the modern society for several political, economical and sociological variables. Rawls’ defends that the veil of ignorance allows for equality within society, however without knowing the prior characteristics, talents and socioeconomic status of the people at cost, how can the distribution of benefits and burdens be equal and just to all parties? A major weakness of the veil of ignorance is that it does not account for merit or talent, resulting in unfairness and unjustness between parties. Another argument against Rawls’ principles of justice and the veil of ignorance is the opposition to utilitarianism. Rawls’ principles of justice call for the equal distribution of services, property and benefits. In this case, the maximum level of wellbeing in society can be jeopardized. Why prohibit a society from producing as much good as it can? Isn’t it better to have…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    A Theory of Justice
    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A Theory of Justice

    Necessarily, “a set of principles is required for choosing among the various social arrangements which determine this division of advantages.” This set of principles, which decides how goods are to be distributed, represents the principles of justice for Rawls. Proper principles must proceed from a position of fairness and equality: “they are the principles that free and rational…

    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Distributive Justice
    • 4465 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Distributive Justice

    First published Sun Sep 22, 1996; substantive revision Mon Mar 5, 2007 Principles of distributive justice are normative principles designed to guide the allocation of the benefits and burdens of economic activity. After outlining the scope of this entry and the role of distributive principles, the first relatively simple principle of distributive justice examined is strict egalitarianism, which advocates the allocation of equal material goods to all members of society. John Rawls' alternative distributive principle,…

    • 4465 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Rawls' Difference Principle
    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rawls' Difference Principle

    Rawls believed in the ideal of perfect equality. This meant, to him, that everyone should have equal opportunity and receive the same treatment. To Rawls, there was only one reason why anyone should be treated differently to any other person – to help the worst off members of society. He called this reason the difference principle, and in conjunction with his “Justice as Fairness” ideal it formed the basis of his claims about distributive justice.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Veil Of Ignorance Analysis
    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Rawls Veil Of Ignorance Analysis

    John Rawls is generally considered as the most prominent political and moral thinkers of the twentieth century in America. Rawls spent around two decades to planning a hypothesis of equity which is called Justice as fairness and distributed the hypothesis in A Theory of Justice in 1971. Rawls present a fanciful picture of individuals in the original position, behind a veil of ignorance, debating the standards of equity. In principle of Justice, Rawls appropriates the social contract convention in accommodating a liberal responsibility to individual rights and freedoms with a libertarian duty to social and monetary equality. The original position is a focal component of John Rawls' social contract account of justice, Justice as Fairness, put…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Research Paper
    • 2029 Words
    • 9 Pages

    John Rawls Research Paper

    John Rawls was neo-kantian and a political thinker of the 20th Century. John Rawls believes justice as fairness to society. Some of society seen justice as an unfairness act but, could not really explain why they may feel justice is unfair. John Rawls helped explain what unfairness may mean to society and that’s subjectivity of justice: what may be fair to me, may not be fair to others. John Rawls explained 2 principles of fairness one is equality and the other is difference.…

    • 2029 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Theory of Social Justice Applied in Hong Kong
    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Theory of Social Justice Applied in Hong Kong

    The most influential theory that he proposed as well as the theory that he is primarily known for, is his theory of Justice as Fairness. In his theory, a society where social justice is done, should consist of free and equal persons. The citizens should possess political and personal liberties, enjoy equal opportunity and cooperative arrangements that benefit the more and the less advantaged members of society. Thus, according to John Rawls, individuals are regarded as equal and their society is considered as a fair system as long as they are cooperating with each other to make life better off, from one generation to the next.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics