Based on the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid” written by Nicholas Carr, my opinion is that I agree with Carr’s thesis that the internet is interrupting human life. My opinion is that the internet is causing more problems than solving them. For example, I understand that the internet has websites like Wikipedia and other online sources that can help someone write a report on a war or side with a certain group about something. But, sometimes these articles on these websites can be changed by anyone who wants to. These articles sometimes have no facts that jump out to the reader.…
It is far easier to accept data on the internet superficially than it is to be skeptical of information. Carr asserts that this ideology that information collection should be based on efficiency rather than skepticism may be detrimental in the future as artificial intelligence (AI) software develops. The brain will be seen by the public as a computer, much like that of an AI, that should transmit information hastily, rather than seen as a being that should ponder and question sources. He inquires on the safety of such an ideology and encourages readers to analyze that which they read and research. People are capable of deep thought and analysis, so accepting information superficially is dangerous.…
Many people use the Internet in their everyday lives, but they do not understand the negative aspect that it has in their lives. In Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” he explains to us how the Internet affects our brains in a negative way. Some people disagree with Carr and say that the Internet is just a resource that we use in our everyday lives and it does not affect us negatively. Even though the internet has many positive aspects, the internet affects us more negatively in our everyday life.…
77. YouTube is an example of: A. social networking site. B. user generated video sharing Web site. C. podcast. D. blog. E. paid search engine. 78. As the market for iPods and MP3 players grows, the attractiveness of which of the following medium would increase? A. Social networking sites B. Really simple syndication C. User generated video sharing sites D. Blogs E. Podcasting 79. Which of the following statements is true about the Internet? A. A major advantage of the Web is the ability to target very specific groups of individuals. B. One major disadvantage of the Internet is that it leads to a lot of waste coverage. C. In the consumer market, the Internet resembles a combination trade magazine and trade show, as only those most interested in the products and/ or services a site has to offer will visit the site. D. The Internet does not offer to carry one-to-one marketing messages. E. One of the main disadvantages of the Internet is the lack of creative opportunity associated with its use. 80. Some marketers believe the Internet will eventually replace traditional forms of advertising. Others disagree. Which of the following weaknesses of the Internet would support those who disagree? A. Lack of reliability of the research numbers generated B. Its inability to provide in-depth information C. Its inability to offer sight and sound D. Its lack of sales potential E. Its lack of creativity…
In this paper I will be writing how the internet can sometimes have false information. By picking one of the four web sites provided. I have chosen save the tree octopus mainly because the sound of it seems false. I will identify 3 factual claims and 3 fictitious claims and explain how I was able to differentiate between fact and fiction. Also I will explain what makes it believable and what makes it suspect.…
Many people argue that internet is making us smarter, due to the fact that it has given us an easier access to look for information on any topics within seconds, however the internet is filled with unreliable sources and information. Especially on certain websites, like Wikipedia which allows everyone to edit it, which might cause false information to spread around. Another aspect is that internet has made instantaneous communication worldwide a common thing, allowing intercultural experience that was once impossible to succeed. However, social media has created huge distraction to teenagers who often browse through their Facebook, twitter accounts in class and elsewhere. As a matter of fact, internet is making us less attentive and intelligent, as people’s ability to read and write aggravate, moreover, we are constantly distracted by the tremendous amounts of information on the internet, which leads to loss of concentration and memory.…
a. The warrant made in this essay isn’t a very clear one. The author never clearly states in the essay whether or not he believes the internet is making us smarter. He goes on to explain that there are a lot of things that the internet allows us to do however, when comparing between things that are beneficial and not so beneficial, the things people create with the internet that aren’t very beneficial tend to catch on a lot quicker in society.…
There is a wealth of knowledge and information to be found on the web and being able to judge the validity and appropriateness of a website can be very difficult. With the millions of great websites available to everyone there are just as many harmful and useless ones as well. Not all websites out on the web were created with innocent intentions but were created to harm, sell you something, give you false information, or express ones point of view. In the UC Berkley Library website "Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask," they provide a checklist for precautionary measures that you can take to ensure that the website you are on is a valid and appropriate source of information when researching. First, in the search results in the search engine you look at the URLs. Try and find information within the URL to see if it is someone's personal page, what type of domain, and who published it. Second, once inside the page selected to visit begin by scanning the page looking for links that may describe the sites content and what type of credentials the author of the site or page has. Third, UC Berkley recommends that you," look for indicators of quality information. Is the sources on the site documented with footnotes or links?" Is the sites information genuine and not incomplete? Make sure that it is not reproduced or altered information. Are there any other links for any other sources on the same subject? Lastly, you should try and see what others say about this site by simply seeing what other sites link to this page, do a link search in google or yahoo, or do a search on the author. These steps can greatly help you to evaluate the contents of a web page. It isn't by any means fail proof. There are a lot of web pages out there with inaccurate, malicious, and harmful content, but if you use these techniques it may help you to prevent from going to these types of sites and to visit the ones that are truly helpful and…
The criteria illustrated by Thede and Sewell (2010) is important in guiding users to differentiate between reliable and unreliable information. By using this criteria users become knowledgeable about evaluating the credibility of a website. The questions posed in the checklist prompt critical thinking process, and leads us to find the underlying intent of the website. The criteria assist users to check the validity of information by finding if the information is peer-reviewed or verified by qualified editor. Only if the found health information were from a valid scholarly source then it would be trusted. If the user’s intent is to validate the information then this criteria should be applied to any other website regardless of the underlying intent. For instance, commercial website’s sole intent is to sale their products. The Internet users now can search on the web for other websites that offer peer reviews on that product.…
6. Based on this conclusion, do you have any concerns about the trustworthiness of media sources? If so, what?…
It is nice to hear back from you and I would be glad to answer each one of your questions to the best of my ability. There are a lot of things that can be done on the internet. The internet is a wonderful thing to have access to. Having access to the internet can open up a new light to a whole different world. The internet connects people all over the world. The internet gives a person access to lots and lots of information that can be very valuable to them. It is very important in a lot of cases to know rather or not the information that you have accessed is reliable or not. Not know rather or not the information is reliable can cause some major problems. The way that I determine rather or not the information that I access is reliable is by looking for the author’s information so I can know who to give credit to for the information. I consider information credible when it contains a citation. I like to use information that is peer-reviewed because that to means that it is credible because it has been reviewed by other people and deemed to be credible. Knowing if information is credible is important but it is also important to know what to look for the signs that information may not be credible. I prefer to not use information if an author is not known unless I can prove it too credible in other ways. I do not like to use information that can be edited by other people because the information may be their opinion instead of a true fact. I do not like to use information that is out-dated because things in the world is changing at a rapid…
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. It contains millions of articles and depends mainly on volunteers and contributors to ensure that information are up to date. This is an open source that anyone can add and edit articles; so information may not always be accurate. It is the quickest and easier way to gain general knowledge on a specific topic. An encyclopedia is generally not a good source of reference in a paper; rather it can be a starting point in research the topic. The issue of reliability and credibility arises because of lack of credentials of editors, including biased view in content, articles are not peer-reviewed before publishing, source cited may be invalid, style, and tone lacks purpose. Some advantages of Wikipedia are clarification on topics and information is in clear simple terms for easy understanding.…
One of the major challenges today, with the sheer amount of information available at your fingertips via the Web, is determining the reliability of the information presented. It can be quite difficult to determine the quality, authenticity, and authority of the information you encounter. However, there are a number of tools and skills at your disposal that help to determine if the information you find is trustworthy and of academic quality. Watch the Evaluating Websites tutorial to learn more about how to determine the quality of information found on the Web. Review the tutorial: “Evaluating Websites,” located at http://tutorials.gcumedia.com/evaluatingWebTutorial/vp02.swf…
The world wide web is comparable to a vast jungle, spanning millions of miles, bursting with an excess of information that is constantly feeding in and out of the population’s brain. Ever since the release of the internet to the public in the late 1980’s, the United States has allowed its citizens to connect technologically. Commonly known as the the literal “center” of most humans’ lives, the internet is home to many different groups of people, with various messages. It may not seem obvious to a normal reader, however, most online sources are deceiving. Many online or non-traditional sources divert from the truth and provide the reader with false propaganda, to persuade an action or belief in favor of the source.…
For a person who does not do research on the internet, credibility may not mean a whole lot. Due to ease of access to the internet, a lot of people use this source to retrieve information. But, when the internet is used for this purpose, it is important to follow certain guidelines. The first thing that comes to most people's minds when they read something from the internet is, "Is this true?" One must learn to make up one's mind by asking exploratory questions about the source being used. For the information to have credibility not only does it entail believing the information but also making sure that one verifies it in many different ways.…