Therblig Analysis
| |THERBLIG ANALYSIS CHECKLIST | | | | |
| |Reach and Move |Yes No |
| |1. Can either of these therbligs be eliminated? | |• | |
|~ |2. Can distances be shortened to advantage? | |• | |
| |3. Are the best means (conveyors, tongs, tweezers) being used? | |• |• |
| |4. |Is the correct body member (fingers, wrist, forearm, shoulder) being used? | |• |• |
| |5. Can a gravity chute be employed? | |• |• |
| |6. Can transports be effected through mechanization and foot-operated devices? | |• |• |
| |7. Will time be reduced by transporting in larger units? | |• |• |
| |8. |Is time increased because of the nature of the material being moved or because of a | | | |
| | |subsequent delicate positioning? | |• |• |
| |9. Can abrupt changes in direction be eliminated? |• |• |
| |Grasp |Yes No |
| |1. Would it be advisable for the operator
| |Reach and Move |Yes No |
| |1. Can either of these therbligs be eliminated? | |• | |
|~ |2. Can distances be shortened to advantage? | |• | |
| |3. Are the best means (conveyors, tongs, tweezers) being used? | |• |• |
| |4. |Is the correct body member (fingers, wrist, forearm, shoulder) being used? | |• |• |
| |5. Can a gravity chute be employed? | |• |• |
| |6. Can transports be effected through mechanization and foot-operated devices? | |• |• |
| |7. Will time be reduced by transporting in larger units? | |• |• |
| |8. |Is time increased because of the nature of the material being moved or because of a | | | |
| | |subsequent delicate positioning? | |• |• |
| |9. Can abrupt changes in direction be eliminated? |• |• |
| |Grasp |Yes No |
| |1. Would it be advisable for the operator