Many say that natural law means observable law relating to natural experience and also a body of unchanging moral principles regarded as a basis for all human conduct. There is believed to be two main meanings to natural law, one by St. Thomas Aquinas, and another by Aristotle. However Aquinas based his theory on the theory of Aristotle. Aristotle believed that what is a natural good can be found through our experience, and our experience tells us if something is good if it fulfils its purpose. He also stated that all humans should ever want for themselves and their child is eudemonia, happiness. Aquinas said that goods for which we have a natural inclination include life, the procreation and education of offspring and knowledge. Whether there are additional goods that are symbolic of the natural law will depend on whether they in fact contribute to our rational perfection. He said humans are to do good and avoid evil. He argued that fulfilling our purpose is the only ‘good’ for humans.
On one hand, it could be argued that the statement is correct; there is no such thing as natural good, because firstly natural good is not reflected at all fin the animal kingdom, but if all living things have this inbuilt sense of natural good, then why do we not see it is them. Also natural good implies that goodness is from function or purpose, but there is disagreement over that function or purpose, the idea of natural good is much harder to define, so in those circumstances what is natural good. Some people may think that taking drugs is there purpose in life and this can be appeared to be an apparent good. Many people follow these apparent goods and confuse them for real goods, and that is where we could argue that there is no such thing as natural good because nobody knows what the purpose is of life, so therefore nobody knows what good they are supposed to achieve. Also it could be said that there is no such thing as natural good because Aquinas says that there is good inside everyone put there by god, but if everyone were ‘good’ then surely there would be no evil in the world which is proven in many countries in Africa, for example child soldiers. If natural law is put in us by God, then surely we would have the 10 commandments inside us, so even those people who have been brought up to do evil, would know it is not right and stop because they have this in built sense of morality. Finally the things that Aquinas has said to be natural good, are quite random and therefore not reliable because surely everybody would have a different natural good because we all grow up in different societies and believe completely theories about everything, so there is no way that we all have this one good in common. So basically can this natural good exist if it isn’t universal inside all people?
However, on the other hand it could be argued that there is such thing as natural good because natural good can be established by reason or purpose, which is Aristotle’s point that there are 4 causes for everything, which all points to the final cause which is the reason something exists at all. This gives an idea of what natural law is and if it is the same for every person. However in all human there is a fundamental instinct telling you to do right all the time, so this point argues that there is a natural good, because we all have a final reason to be living and human would always be swayed to doing right rather than wrong. Also Aristotle says that everybody has their telos, which is their main aim/goal in life so if it is from God then surely it must be to do good, and to achieve ultimate happiness, eudemonia. Also from a Christian viewpoint, in the Bible it says that God made everyone in the image of himself, which obviously implies that everybody has goodness in them. So there inbuilt sense of morality, or their conscience would tell them what is right and what is wrong. Therefore surely humans can determine themselves what is right and what is wrong, therefore there must be a natural good because it was given to humans by God, who we know is omnipotent.
In conclusion, I believe that there is such thing as natural law because in humans, proven everyday there is a conscience which always encourages us to do the right thing because it was put there by god. So if we actually followed our conscience and follow our instinct which is not bad as it was made in the image of God, we would be doing good and therefore natural good.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Aquinas developed the Natural law Theory, with which he proposed five ‘telos’ that he believed were our duty to follow. His 5 primary precepts- ‘Worship God Ordered society, Reproduction, Learning and Defend the innocent’ are deontological. However, whilst being deontological, Natural Law does have some flexibility with the more teleological, secondary precepts.…
- 1013 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
h. Natural law – the idea that ethical principles are apparent in nature to all well-educated, reasonable men and so form the basis of human rights and good government.…
- 3368 Words
- 14 Pages
Powerful Essays -
According to the textbook, the definition of natural law is the expression of what a person knows in his or her own soul to be right or wrong. The Ten Commandments are a perfect way to apply natural law. A great Commandment to focus on when speaking of natural law is the 7th Commandment, “Thou shall not steal.” In the world that we live in today, I believe that this Commandment is often broken the most. About 75% of the people that rob or steal something feel an immediate guilt, whether they are stealing something very small or very large. The guilt that people feel in their conscience is not taught and is naturally inbred into your soul; This guilt is also called natural law. A good example of how natural law affects a person is the…
- 309 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The original concept of Natural law was thought of by Aristotle and was then adapted by Thomas Aquinas to fit the teachings and views of the Roman Catholic Church. Who was concerned with moral law of how human beings should behave .It is understood by reflecting on human nature and by rationally working what will lead to fulfilling your purpose. According to natural law “good” can only be achieved when the subject has fulfilled its end purpose, the end purpose of human beings is to be rational and achieve Eudemonia. Eudemonia is human flourishing, when they achieve happiness. Aquinas also believed natural law was in everyone, so everyone is good. Human’s unconsciously aim for perfection, to avoid evil and aim for god. Because we are made in god’s image, we are unable to knowingly go for evil. As Animals and humans share desires and wishes it’s only the ability to be rational that separates the human beings from the beasts. Aquinas also believed that the only way to discover divine design in nature, would be through human reason. The divine design was created to the essence/the idea before its actual existence. So the only way reason discovers what is right, is by interpreting nature.…
- 1069 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
“Life, liberty, and property” are the main ideas of Locke’s natural law theory. Locke claims that “The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges everyone; and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it that, being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm one another in his life, health, liberty, or possession…” (SB, 35). According to Locke, in the state of nature, there is a set of universal law which depends on human reason and human nature. Every human being is naturally equal and free under any circumstance. The law educates all human beings to live in one livable community where everyone should treat others equally and peacefully. In addition, no one should destroy or control other human lives such as having them as servants for one business. Every member in the community should join together into one group for their amicable life and in order to maintain a civil society.…
- 1167 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In this essay I will discuss the differences between Hume's 'natural' and 'artificial' virtues. I will first give Hume's explanation of why there is a need for a distinction or classification of virtues, and the basis on which he makes the distinction, before describing the two categories and their criteria. I will look at the problems with Hume's account of the distinction, particularly justice. Finally I will describe how the various problems cast doubt on Hume's distinction.…
- 1432 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In this article it explains the correlations between environmental issues and race. It says that environmental justice incorporates the principle of the right of all individuals to be protected from environmental degradation. the grassroots people are the only ones that took notice to the potential problem. That minorities are the impacted more by environmental pollution which can lead to mistreatment by the government. The equity has not been the same across the board putting minorities at risk.…
- 431 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
As defined by the Philosophical Dictionary, the Natural Law Theory is "In moral philosophy, a norm, custom, or set of beliefs shared by people living in different cultures or eras. Such a “law” is supposedly derived from Nature (via reason or some other natural human faculty) and is considered binding on all humans everywhere. Ancient Stoicism, for example, held that there are eternal laws that govern all human actions and that happiness depends on recognizing and living in harmony with these fundamental “laws of nature.” Similarly, Aquinas argued that God established a set of universal laws – ascertainable through reason alone (hence available to everyone, regardless of their religion) – that operate for the welfare and benefit of all creatures.”…
- 197 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Natural Law- a system of law that is determined by nature, and thus universal. Used to analyze human nature both social and personal- and deduce binding rules of moral behavior from it.…
- 2624 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the first chapter; ‘The Law of Human Nature’ the author tells his reader how the law of nature is seen by today’s thinkers, and of older thinkers. That the law is not merely another natural law as to gravity is, but how it is more of a way of thinking. Showing how all people of a way of knowing how to act, for example when he had said “.. The human idea of decent behavior was obvious to everyone”. In this chapter he also talks about, how the natural law has much criticism and how some say it could not be true, because of different ages and civilizations have had different ideas about how to basically think and act. He disagrees with this claim because; despite where you come from you will always know what is real right and wrong.…
- 887 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
I am honored to be among the lecturers in this series on natural law. Many of the speakers are among my heroes and friends. One of my heroes, Alasdair MacIntyre, used one of his favorite terms in his talk: he spoke of "plain persons" and their grasp of morality and natural law in contradistinction to the experts and professional philosophers and their grasp of these matters. A few years ago in Dallas he gave a talk entitled "Do plain persons need to be moral philosophers?" When I was asked to give the response to his talk, I was most honored because I considered Prof. MacIntyre one of the foremost moral philosophers in the world and it was a thrill to comment on his work. I felt dreadfully underqualified — I felt like some high school kid going up against Larry Bird — until I realized that I need not respond as an expert, as a moral philosopher of his caliber, but that I could respond as the quintessential plain person — for that is what I am. After all, I am Janet Smith, daughter of John and Anne Smith; I grew up at 5 Hill Street and went to Home Street School — I could go on but it is all very plain.The point I am making here is not merely a flip one — designed to ease us into more serious matters through an attempt at humor. There is a serious point here — natural law, is the "plain person's" morality — in a sense it is simply plain old common sense. There are profound and sophisticated ways at explaining natural law, but the practiceof reasoning in accord with natural law principals, according to the theory itself, is natural to plain persons — that is, natural to all mankind for natural law holds that many of the most fundamental principles of moral reasoning are obvious, that is easily known by all. Yet, in spite of the plain commonsensicalness of natural law, it can seem shocking and provocative in many ways, for like natural law, plain old common sense does not command a lot of followers these days and can…
- 6621 Words
- 27 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Natural law is in practiced in a strictly ethical sense. Natural law is the rule of conduct which is prescribed to use by the Creator in the constitution of the nature with which He has endowed us. According to St. Thomas, it is “nothing else than the rational creature’s participation in the eternal law.” Eternal law is God’s wisdom. Like the rest of creation, man is destined by God to an end, and from Him, a direction towards this end. Everyone follows eternal and natural law. Every man, every woman, and every child should be able to preach both of these laws. St. Thomas Aquinas is known as, “the most brilliant light of the Church.” Aquinas has taught through his mind and spiritual outlooks upon the world. He took his thoughts and opinions from within and…
- 505 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Natural Law is a set of principles regarded as a basis for which all human beings should live their lives. It originated from the Greek philosopher Aristotle and was finished off by Thomas Aquinas. Natural Law is based on the idea that everyone has the same opinion on what is morally right or wrong - this allows Natural Law to be applied universally. It is an absolutist approach - meaning that there are no exceptions to the Primary Precepts. There are five of these Primary Precepts, all of which are in accordance with the main human purpose. These five precepts are: to worship God; to live in society; to educate children; the continuation of the species through reproduction and the self-preservation and the preservation of the innocent. Natural Law is also based on the idea that God created everything for a purpose, allowing Aristotle's Four Causes theory to be applicable here.…
- 886 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Although Aristotle did not use the term ‘natural law’ many medieval philosophers considered him as one of the first exponents of the fundamentals of natural law. Stoic philosophy was the first to introduce the term ‘natural law’ with the Stoics emphasising nature and the moral requirement to accept and conform to what is given in nature. This Greek philosophy spanned several centuries and greatly influenced the Roman philosopher Cicero. Cicero (d. 43BC) was a strong advocate of natural law and spoke of natural law as the innate power of reason to direct action. Catholic natural law theory was formulated by St. Thomas Aquinas over seven centuries ago. He identified one fundamental norm of natural law: do good and avoid evil. Doing good in this context is following reason’s lead to actualise human…
- 2320 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Natural Evil is all the causes of suffering and includes all evil caused by natural means – not by human doing. This could include natural disasters, droughts, disease, or even being killed by an animal. In all these there is no human perpetrator to blame for the “infliction” of evil. Natural is the broad term covering all these things. Natural Evil stands in contrast to moral evil.…
- 733 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays