Preview

"I think, therefore I am"

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
559 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
"I think, therefore I am"
"I think, therefore I am"

The statement "I think, therefore I am" lays the groundwork for Renè Descartes ' argument in the Meditations. To understand this expression, one must put themselves in Descartes ' place. He started off trying to figure what he can know with certainty. He examined a large body of knowledge and figured out that he cannot be certain of any knowledge at all. Beginning in Meditation Two, Descartes searches for the something that must be true no matter what. This led to the conclusion that he does in fact exist if he can still think. It is from this Archimedean Point that Descartes goes on to build a new, well-built body of knowledge about his existence and God 's existence. The statement "I think, therefore I am" cannot be doubted.

Descartes felt that that the power of thinking or sensing has nothing to do with the physical body. If he could cease all thinking than he could cease to exist. A thing that thinks is "a thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and that also imagines and senses"(Descartes 20). There is a clear separation between the mind and the body. If the body exists, it does not mean the "I" exist. The mind is something that is thinking, indivisible, and non-extended while the body is something that is non-thinking, divisible and extended. He believes in the standard of perfection, which must be separate from his mind because of the imperfection in his thinking.

A common objection to Descartes ' theory is that an evil demon could be making one think that "I am". Descartes ' reasons for doubt are that his senses are misleading him, the possibility of him dreaming, or the mischievous God that dwells on deceiving him. Even if he was being deceived, he is still a thinking thing since he recognizes himself being misled. One cannot be tricked unless they actually exist. In order for him to trust his own ideas, he must believe that a non-deceiving God exists. To be certain that this God exists, he must be able



Cited: Descartes, Renè. Meditations on First Philosophy. Trans. Donald A. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1993.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    [ 7 ]. A VIEW OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES, The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. 18, No. E. H. (Penn State University PressStable 3 July, 1884),p.g 230…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essence of the main argument in the fourth Meditation of Descartes is to establish that there is a difference between God: his creator and himself, and how this difference does not taint the infinite abilities of God. Descartes commences his argument by first establishing his idea of being a thinking being. In his previous book, The Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy he sates,…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Meditations on First Philosophy, René Descartes concludes that we are distinct from our body, and can exist without it. Seen from a modern materialist’s perspective, Descartes’ view is quite obviously wrong. However, assuming no knowledge of modern science, we should still be able to disprove his conclusion by looking for flaws in his reasoning in the text. In this essay, I will examine three relevant arguments Descartes presents in his sixth meditation and point out their flaws respectively.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that there is a chance that he is imagining life. When a person envisions, he or she basically designs thoughts that exist to be judged by the brain. The method in which thoughts are created should not always be valid, and due to this they cannot be right all the time. One can have the possibility of some substance that does not exist, for example, an alarm, and this does not represent any issue. Descartes looks at the observations people have in our sleep to those people have when they are alert, these two scenarios are closely identical. He reasons that there is no complete approach to recognize being conscious from being asleep. Nonetheless, he keeps up that there are sure things that would be ignorant to question. He considers a few of his earlier opinions as having a chance of containing doubtfulness. Descartes believes since he thinks therefore he must exist meaning his own being in reality is…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Descartes. “Meditations on First Philosophy.” Classics of Western Philosophy. Cahn, Steven M. 8th Edition. Cambridge, IN: Hackett Pub, 2012. 47-79. Print.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes proves that God exists in his third meditation. He proves that God exists because he wants to be certain about things outside of himself. But, he cannot be certain of these things if he is ignorant about the existence of God. This is because if a supreme God exists, he could cause Descartes to be mistaken in the one avenue to certainty that he has. This avenue is known as clear and distinct perception, and, according to Descartes, it is what is necessary to be certain about a thing. However, a supreme God could easily be deceiving him even when he thinks he is correct as a result of this clear and distinct perception. This is known as the metaphysical doubt. Therefore, to remove this basis for doubt, it is important to Descartes to establish whether this supreme God is capable of deceiving him. But first, he must establish whether this God exists.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes and Locke both agreed that there were things in life that exist that we can be certain of. For Descartes, human experiences did not provide sufficient proof of existence. He indicated that through his Dream Conjecture and his Evil-Demon Theory (Paquette 205). Descartes stated that we cannot be certain if reality is a dream or not, thus questioning our existence (Paquette 205). In his Evil-Demon Theory, Descartes claimed that for all he knew, an evil demon could be putting thoughts into his head, making him think that reality was true when it was in fact false (Paquette 205). Ultimately, all this thinking resulted in Descartes coming to the conclusion that the one thing we could be sure of existing is the mind (Newman 2010). This can be seen through his most famous quote, “I think therefore I am (Kaplan 2008).” Descartes claimed that since he was able to doubt and think using his mind, his mind must exist (Paquette 205).…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes vs Hume

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    René Descartes realized that many of the things that he have accepted as the truth was false opinions, and consequentially the principles that were built upon them. He wanted to start anew by try to find out “the truth”, and then build upon that, because the foundation of science requires absolute certainty. In his attempt to find “the truth,” he started to criticize all of the things he had formally believed: applying the method of doubts, and then remove from the foundation what he found to be doubtable or deducible. He did this as he believed as his doubt increase, certainty decrease and vice versa. By the end of Meditation I, he was in a state called “Abyss,” where he was skeptical of all things and decided that the empirical world was presented to him by an evil demon He then reasoned that for him to be deceived by the demon, he must exist as something, a mind or a thinking thing…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes and Skepticism

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    René Descartes was a great scientist, mathematician and philosopher. He was known for his extensive work on skepticism, and in particular a piece called “Meditations on First Philosophy” (written in 1641) which is still widely used by modern philosophers. In this publication, Descartes’ aim was to demonstrate that a persons’ soul is eternal and that God exists. He explains in Meditation One that it is possible to question the existence of all things; in Meditation two he goes on to give details regarding the existence of the mind and the soul. In the Third Meditation he gives arguments of proof of Gods’ existence; and in Meditation Four he explains the difference between truth and error. In the Fifth Meditation Descartes provides further arguments to prove the existence of God and in the Sixth and final meditation he brings it all together as he demonstrates how knowledge of the mind can be guided by God and therefore validates the knowledge we have of physical world. (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2010).…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He also noted that the physical world did not exist, which might imply that he is nonexistence. However, to have these doubts he must exist. For an evil demon to mislead him in all these different ways, he must exist in order to be mislead. Descartes formulates "I am, I exist" or "I Think, therefore I am" but for how long?(Descartes, pg. 82). For as long as I am thinking(Descartes,Pg 82). He goes on to explore what thinking is. A thing that think he says, is one that doubts, affirms, denies etc. Descartes first thought he had a soul, which means he was nourished, moved, could sense and think and also that he had a…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Through Descartes first three meditations he arrives at a conclusion that the only things we know with absolute certainty are, that my own thoughts and god exist. He solidifies this stance by two foundational arguments laid out in the first meditation to build off of. I find that these arguments to reach these beliefs to be flawed by Descartes own reasoning and by scientific advancements made since his time. Before I can debate these arguments I need to outline Descartes purpose and reasoning for them. Then I will present my case and justifications on why Descartes process of reaching his beliefs is unconvincing.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Descartes, R, Murdoch, D. & Cottingham, and J. Descartes: selected philosophical writings Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He starts to build the foundation of knowledge with the statement “ I think, therefore I am,” and because that thought is true while occurring, it is a clear and distinct perception. So, Descarte does not need to rely on God to prove the existence of clear and distinct perceptions. However, while it is true that we can clearly and distinctly perceive that the statement “ I think, therefore I am” is true, we only know this is true because it directly relates to our own being. God is a more abstract subject and we have no proof to suggest that our ability to reason about such topics is reliable. God is an infinite being with a higher reality than ours so it is plausible that if he was to exist we would not be able to fully comprehended his existence or his will, so we can not claim with certainty that God is not a deceiver because that would be claiming to have a solid understanding of how something with a higher reality than ours when we can not even fathom its existence on our…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes was a foundationalist. His goal was to find certain indubitable ideas to use as a foundation to build his thoughts. His aim was to find a single or multiple certainties to build his thoughts off of. Descartes figures that if he can come up with a hyperbolic doubt and some idea can still survive through this ultimate doubt then this is the most certain scenario. This hyperbolic doubt becomes to believe is, “ not that there is a supremely good God who is the source of all truth, but that there is an evil demon supremely powerful and cunning, who works as hard as he can to deceive me” (Descartes 159). In Meditation III of his Meditations, Descartes aim to prove that this assumption is not true. By proving God, Descarte proves that…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays