Preview

This Essay Is Compared Nuclear Power Against Fossil Fuels . in This Essay , I Will Show Efficency of the Nuclear Energy Compared to Fossil Fuels.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
304 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
This Essay Is Compared Nuclear Power Against Fossil Fuels . in This Essay , I Will Show Efficency of the Nuclear Energy Compared to Fossil Fuels.
This essay is compared Nuclear power against Fossil Fuels . In this essay , I will show efficency of the Nuclear energy compared to Fossil Fuels.
First of all , Nuclear power is the use of sustained nuclear fission to generate heat and electricity. Nuclear power plants provided about 5.7% of the world's energy and 13% of the world's electricity.The IAEA( International Atomic Energy Agency ) reported there were 439 nuclear power reactors in operation in the world, operating in 31 countries. According to Ewan McLeish in "The Pros and Cons of Nuclear Power," a pellet of nuclear fuel weighs approximately 0.1 ounce (6 grams). However, it can yield the amount of energy equivalent to that generated by a metric tonne of coal, which makes it much more efficient.
Secondly ,Fossil fuels were formed from the organic remains of prehistoric plants and animals. These remains, which are millions of years old, were converted by heat and pressure in the earth's crust into carbon-containing fuels.Both nuclear and fossil fuel power plants produce electricity the same way. The heat generated in these plants is used to generate steam. This steam drives a turbine, which powers a generator that converts mechanical energy to electrical energy.The costs of the production are different. Nuclear takes 1.92 cents to produce one kilowatt-hour of nuclear power. For coal powered plants, it takes 1.88 cents; for natural gas power plants, it takes 2.68 cents; and for oil powered power plants, it takes 3.77 cents to generate the same amount of power.
In conclusion , Nuclear energy is much more efficient than energy from Fossil fuels but the cost of nuclear energy not so low . Coal is the cheapest way to produce power . In my view , people need to improve alternative resources of production an electrisity

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thornghost by Tone Almhjell written by Rahil Patel This stunningly well put together story keeps you at the edge of your seat wondering what happens next! Niklas Summerhill, a 12-year-old farm boy lives with his Uncle Anders and Grandma Alma. The farm, also know as Summerhill is located in the countryside of what seems like Scandinavia. “I am a Thornghost”.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power is produced through the use of nuclear reactions to produce nuclear energy that can then be harnessed to generate heat and create superheated steam to drive turbines. The most common nuclear reaction is that of nuclear fission, which is the splitting of an atom’s nucleus into smaller nuclei. Nuclear reactions are incredibly energy dense and thus allow nuclear reactors to make a tremendous amount of electricity. There are only 61 nuclear power plants in the United States, but they account for 19 percent of the entire country’s electricity production. [8][14] There are 7,304 total power plants in the United States, so nuclear plants on average produce over twenty-eight times as much energy as another plant in the U.S.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today there are so many countries and governments that have realized that nuclear energy is the only way to significantly decrease their emissions. The world economy is producing greenhouse emissions at the…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The initial construction cost of nuclear power plants is large. On top of this, when the power plants first have been built, people are left with the cost to enrich and process the nuclear fuel which also costs a lot of money. How much? Apply concrete details from your research (and cite it). Just think of how nuclear is wasteful too conversational 8 not only that but the people who work there at the plant. Nuclear energy is very costly. Generation electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper than electricity generating from oil, gas, coal and not to talk of the renewable energy source 1 cite. Even though coal pollutes big time doesn’t mean it’s not double negative bad. Coal produces carbon dioxide which we 9 human produce as well. By using coal, it provides just what we need without paying overtime on building one of nuclear buildings which cost way more than a Coal factory.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With nuclear power came what was thought to be a more clean alternative to burning coal and other fossil fuels; Nuclear power does not produce nearly as much of the greenhouse gases as coal produces. People and society have given nuclear power a bad name, considering the amount of accidents that have happened. Although when you look at statistics it’s not as many as you would believe, or expect. When nuclear power is put head to head with coal power, nuclear power is the more efficient, and the safest way of power production. There are several reasons for this like the amount of fuel burned, pollution levels, and the effect it has on the environment.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have discovered countless energy sources, from fossil fuel combustion to nuclear fission and fusion, each of which have seemed to pose a different problem. Whether the problematic effect seems to be cost or carbon dioxide emission, renewable and nonrenewable resources have both seemed to come with a fair set of cons with their pros. Extensive research on the topic has shown that there seems to be no flawless source of energy extraction, however there certainly are sources that are relatively worse than others. This being said, nuclear energy, from the fusion and fission of radioactive elements, is one of the worst sources of energy because of its immense waste, danger to the general public, and large expenses.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Energy Exploration

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nuclear energy can be very dangerous but can also be cleaner than other energy sources by creating less pollution than fossil fuels. It is an advanced form of energy that has only been available for the past 50 years. It is very similar to fossil fuel in that it uses steam turbines to produce electricity. It uses uranium to produce heat in a process called nuclear fission where neutrons are smashed into the nucleus of atoms splitting them and releasing heat energy.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Along with the advantages of nuclear power, there are also some disadvantages, which we must consider. These may have a very negative effect on our future and other generations to come.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human beings have been using fossil fuels for hundreds of years, satisfying the demand of industrialization. The behavior of using fossil fuels, on the other hand, causes huge pollution, such as soil, water and atmosphere contamination. In addition, fossil fuels, such as solid, liquid and gas, are all facing on the exhaustion. It is evidential that the situations need to be checked or repressed. However, the solutions should satisfy the urgent requirement of energy as well. Nuclear and solar energy are two clean, practicable solutions for human beings. Because they have been tested and been put to use since the mid twentieth century. On the surface, nuclear and solar energy seem absolutely different in other aspects except for low direct pollution and practicability. In fact, they share some significant similarities while they are totally different in other aspects. This essay will concentrate on comparing and contrasting nuclear and solar energy by discussing the similarities in gas emissions, high expend in increasing efficiency and electricity price, and the differences in safety and equipments.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, nuclear power is a clean and low-carbon power. Nuclear power generation does not directly release carbon dioxide or air pollutants, thus will not cause air pollution. Instead of burning fossil fuels, using nuclear power is more efficient in alleviating global warming. From the successful example of France, we can see that countries with high population density…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CAE Writing help - essay

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fossil fuel energy sources, such as oil and coal, are often labeled as bad for the environment, and as unsuitable for long-term energy supplies. The current debate centers on whether to replace fossil fuels with nuclear energy, or with non-nuclear alternatives, such as solar power and wind power. In your opinion, should governments encourage nuclear or non-nuclear energy sources? Give reasons to support your views.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    About Myself Short Essay

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nuclear Power is produced when a nucleus absorbs a neutron and splits into two lighter nuclei. This releases enormous amounts of energy which in turn produces heat. In fact the Uranium, which is the most common element used to produce nuclear power today, has an energy content about 3 million times greater than that of fossil fuel. Consequently 1 gram of Uranium is equivalent to approximately 3 tones of coal. Nuclear reactors harness the heat which is produced from the energy released when the atom splits and convert it into electrical energy. Current Nuclear Power plants require the the use of the rare Uranium isotope U-235 and consequently only use one fifth of the total energy content. Next generation reactors forecast to be available in 2020's will use all the energy in Uranium or the more abundant Thorium.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays