Preview

Thomas Aquinas's Five Ways

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
527 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Aquinas's Five Ways
Pierson Laughlin

Thomas Aquinas’s Five Ways In the beginning of the 13th century, philosopher Thomas Aquinas demonstrated five famous proofs for the existence of God. The first of these proofs is the argument from motion. Aquinas explains that everything is moving, both though time and space, and that each and everything that is moving must be set into motion by a mover. Therefore Aquinas concludes that in the beginning, there must have been an original unmoved mover that has set our world into motion. Aquinas’s second proof is the cosmological argument, which in some ways is similar to his first proof. The cosmological argument tackles the question of existence. Aquinas shows that one object or souls being can not be the source of its own existence. Therefore, at some point in time there would have to have been a source that was in fact responsible for its own being and subsequently also responsible for the being of everything else. This source is, of course, God. Aquinas’s third proof is the argument from necessity. This proof explains that there are two kinds of existences, possible and necessary. Aquinas explains that if nothing had ever existed then through time, nothing would always exist. From this statement he concludes that somethings existence is necessary while the possible existence is only contingent. Aquinas’s fourth proof is the argument from gradation. This argument is based around “the great chain of being” which states that there are different classes of being. It suggests that the lowest forms of beings are inanimate objects and then class rises for increasingly complex animate beings all the way up to angels and an eventual God. Thomas Aquinas’s fifth and final proof is the teleological argument. This argument explains that each and every thing whether it be water, fire, people, or dirt, has its own specific function or own specific way of acting all of the time. Aquinas says that there must be some force keeping these parameters

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The concept that there cannot be nothing and so must be something is due to the evidence we as human beings have experienced throughout our lives; every effect ever made has had a cause. Aquinas used the laws of Motion and Design to demonstrate how every action must have a correlating reaction, and related this to his argument for God being the first cause – the uncaused causer. This is laid out in the Cosmological Argument, taken directly from the Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry;…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aquinas' 3rd Way

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aquinas' third way argument states that there has to be something that must exist, which is most likely God. He starts his argument by saying not everything must exist, because things are born and die every single day. By stating this we can jump to the conclusion that if everything need not exist then there would have been a time where there was nothing. But, he goes on, if there was a time when there was nothing, then nothing would exist even today, because something cannot come from nothing. However, our observations tell us that something does exist, therefore there is something that must exist, and Aquinas says that something is God.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas’ first way is the way of motion. Aquinas uses the existence of motion of demonstrate the existence of God. He said that “Nothing can be moved from a state of potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of actuality”. Here Aquinas uses Aristotle’s argument of the Prime Mover. The Prime Mover causes the movement of other things, in other words, it does not start off the movement by giving it some kind of push, but it is the purpose, or end, or the teleology, of the movement. Change in an object is always caused by an external movement – nothing can change itself. These movements go back in a causal chain, but Aquinas said this chain cannot be infinite so there must be something which set off this chain of movements, an unmoved mover, Prime Mover (God). Things change to fulfil their potential. If things could change themselves they would be both…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.…

    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas's argument for the existence of God is a deductive argument. This assessment is based on the nature of the premises in the argument. As discussed during classroom lectures, the argument's premises and conclusion can be translated as evaluate the truth value of the premises and how they support the conclusion.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But even with Thomas Aquinas’ third proof which cannot be ruled out by infinite regress, the cosmological argument is still not convincing for the existence of God because, like all the other cosmological theories, they make a huge assumption at the conclusion that the answer to it all is God, yet there is no evidence to suggest why it would be God so I see no reason to accept this. Even Aquinas said that the cosmological argument could not prove that God exists; you had to have had faith as well with it.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Telelogical argument

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    St.Thomas Aquinas believed that existence of god could be proven. In his Summa Theologiae Aquinas put forward five proofs (or five ways) for the existence of God:First Way – Argument from Motion Second Way – Causation of Existence Third Way – Contingent and Necessary Objects Fourth Way – The Argument from Degrees and Perfection Fifth Way – The Argument from Intelligent Design.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Teleological Essay Philos

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The original teleological argument was developed by Aquinas in which he used his fifth way to prove the existence of God. The teleological argument is an a posteriori argument which looks at design in our world in order to prove God’s existence. Aquinas’ fifth way stated that everything operates as to a design, this design being God. Aquinas developed this to say that this operative design follows certain natural laws and therefore God is necessary to provide purpose and cause to these laws.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Paper 1

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the “Five Ways of Proving God’s Existence” by St. Thomas Aquinas is his “Third Way” which is taken from possibility to necessity and goes on from there. In life, there are things that have the possibility to be or not to be. Everything in this world is either living or not. However, it is impossible for these “things” to exist or live for eternity on Earth. Life comes to an end inevitably. So, if everything had the ability not to be then at some point there was no existence on earth. Assuming that to be true, then today there would be nothing in existence because to begin to exist you need something that is already existing. Therefore, if at one time there was no existence, then it is impossible to…

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument starts by stating there is an efficient cause for everything. Nothing can be an efficient cause of itself. It is not possible to regress to infinity in efficient causes (Harris, 44). To take away the cause is to take away the effect. If there is no first cause then there will be no others (Harris, 45). Clearly Aquinas argues for an Efficient Cause. It indicates that each prior cause must itself have its own cause leading to God as the Efficient Cause (Harris, 45). His “Third proof” is the argument from…

    • 2372 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Explain the thrid way by Aquinas...which is called the argument from contigency. (2 or 3 sentences)…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This particular argument is also in favor if the idea that God does in fact exist, but Aquinas has a different explanation from Anselm. Thomas Aquinas presents the argument known as the “Cosmological” or “first cause”. In a few words, this means that Aquinas believes there must have been a first cause in the world. Aquinas argues that the proof of Gods existence is based on the basis of experiences. God must exist because every being that is dependent for existence was caused by something else that happened prior to it. He believes either there is a boundless chain of contingent beings that is extending backwards or there is a first cause, something that was not caused by something else but began everything else. But in reality, there cannot be a continuous chain extending backwards. Therefore; there is a first cause, something that was not caused by anything else but started everything else that currently exists. Aquinas claims the existence of God can be proven in five ways: Argument from motion, Nature of efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and Governance of the world. Aquinas gives us an argument that is not hard to interpret. There must have been one who created mankind, constructing the world one being at a time. It is very easy to go along with the idea that there is one person or thing that created everything else. While this argument is clear and…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    St. Thomas Aquinas presents one of the earliest teleological arguments in his Summa Theologica. Aquinas argues that anything with knowledge moves toward and end or cause. But, natural bodies, or planets, do not have knowledge and they still move toward an end. By an end, Aquinas means that the planets take the same path of orbit around the sun. Thus, Aquinas argues, if an unintelligent body is moving toward an end, it must be directed by an intelligent being. This intelligent being must be God (Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Article 3, Question…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agnosticism - 1

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thomas Aquinas is a firm believer of the existence of a god; He argues for the proof of god by his five proofs. For motion to take place, something must have caused it to move, every effect has a cause, Something that doesn’t exist cannot make something come into existence, a standard of living, and all beings considered unintelligent half to be led some something. For his first “proof of God” Aquinas argues that any motion that takes place requires something to cause it to move. For example a ball won’t move, unless a slope causes it to roll down a hill, or a child kicks it. So the ball always had the potential to move, but its potential cannot be reached unless something acts upon it. By this theory something had to start the movement of the universe, which the only first mover could be God. In his second proof Cause and effect is brought into play. It is very similar to his first proof in that nothing would happen unless something caused it to happen. And because an infinite series of cause and effect is irrational, there must be an original cause that requires no cause; Hence God. The third proof deals with being or not being. All things have the possibility of existing or not existing. The shirt that you are wearing now exists but there was a time when it did not. Aquinas’s argument is that for that something to go from not being to being, there had to be an original being to create it. For example the shirt that you wear had to be created in a factory; And to manufacture something you must “be”. So…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays