Preview

Thomas Aquinas Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
922 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Aquinas Argument
Alexander Haydon – Essay #2
What came first, the chicken or the egg? Philosophers have questioned what came first, and the existence of a higher power for thousands of years. Theist, Atheist, and Agnostic, society classifies people based on their answer to the question of the existence of a higher power, or God in this case. Aquinas, arguably one of the most famous philosophers, states that the existence of god can be proven through the five ways, an excerpt from his work the Summa Theologica. The five ways or arguments that Aquinas uses to prove the existence of a higher power are the Arguments from Motion, Efficient Causes, Possibility and Necessity, Gradation of Being, and Design. Of the five different arguments that Aquinas proposed to
…show more content…
This argument proves that God was the first cause, which established the current series of efficient causes. Aquinas stated in the Summa Theologica that there are a series of causes which produced the things one sees in the world. It is logical to state that none of the things one witnesses can exist prior to themselves; as a result, if a previous efficient cause does not exist then neither would the result. Therefore, if there is not a first efficient cause, then there cannot be an effect. Aquinas believed that it was impossible for efficient causes to extend into infinity. Without a first cause, a specific start, the series of causes that produced the world would not be present. Since one is present, one can recognize the existence of a first efficient cause that could be named God. The argument of efficient causes can be described through a number of explanations, such as a builder creating a home. The builder is able to recognize the potential of the materials and construct them into a home; the materials themselves, however, are unable to turn themselves into a home. Another example is a set of dominos; someone has to push the first domino to begin the series of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his Summa Theologica number seventeen, article two, Aquinas is trying to answer the question of whether there is falsity in the senses and, if there is, how it exists. He concludes that falsity does exist in the senses in the way that the senses can misjudge objects. Aquinas maintains that the senses can perceive the likeness of an object in one of three ways. The first is by the color of the object and other proper qualities which occur in only one sense. The second is by the common qualities of shape and size which can be validated by more than one of the senses. Finally, the third occurs accidently and not of its own nature. He follows that by stating the premises for his argument. Aquinas’s first premise is the sense gains false knowledge…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas also presented an argument to support design qua purpose. Similarly to Paley, he argued that all natural occurrences show evidence of design. He claimed that this suggested there is a being which directs all things, and as humans have knowledge this being must also be knowledgeable. Therefore there is an intelligent being that directs everything towards its purpose, and Aquinas stated that this being must be God. Unlike Paley, Aquinas explained that God is a designer at work who continues to direct us towards our purpose as well as regulating the universe (e.g. the planets and the seasons). He also attempted to explain how free-will plays a part in design, claiming that we are programmed to reproduce but free-will allows us to choose who we reproduce with. Through these points he also demonstrated a key aspect of the design qua regularity side of the Teleological Argument.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The idea of God is intense, as both of these analyses have shown. Aquinas’ idea of God is “Ipsum esse subsistens,” or Subsistent Act of Existing Itself (Magee, 2015). To speak of God as a self-subsistent being is to say He “Just Is.” He articulates every creature is “fundamentally composed of essence and existence.” In order for everything to exist, there must be a First Cause and Aquinas says God is that cause because without it, nothing exists. God is infinite simplicity and perfect. Aquinas and Tillich both see God as Being Itself (Fesser, 2011). Tillich places God “above God.” He writes, “God does not exist.” However, this is not in an attempt to deny God, but to demonstrate that God transcends everything.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aquinas' 3rd Way

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aquinas' third way argument states that there has to be something that must exist, which is most likely God. He starts his argument by saying not everything must exist, because things are born and die every single day. By stating this we can jump to the conclusion that if everything need not exist then there would have been a time where there was nothing. But, he goes on, if there was a time when there was nothing, then nothing would exist even today, because something cannot come from nothing. However, our observations tell us that something does exist, therefore there is something that must exist, and Aquinas says that something is God.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each premise that is supporting the conclusion in the argument is claimed to be true in every instance. There has always been an order of causes based on the very nature of existence. The order of causes cannot go in a circle has always been true. The fact that the order of causes cannot go on forever has always been the case. The fourth premise in the argument is a conditional statement,claiming that, if premises one, two, and three are true, then it is true that the first cause in the order of causes is what is referred to as God. The conclusion of the fourth premise serves as the fourth premise for the argument.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas was a very important man to the cosmological argument; it was him who came up with some of the strongest theories to support the argument. He came up with his five proofs which to him proved the cosmological argument to be true. One of his proof was the ‘cause’ proof, this goes as follows; nothing can change by itself therefore everything is caused and as Aquinas didn’t believe in infinite regress he said that there couldn’t be a series of infinite causes. So there must be a first cause, a cause that isn’t itself caused by another, and Aquinas would say this is God. But if infinite regress was proved to be true or even possible it would completely undermine this argument and prove it invalid, this is the same case as many of the other theories of the cosmological argument.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Telelogical argument

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aquinas observed the universe and saw that everything in the universe was working towards a purpose for e.g. Tress growing leaves every spring and losing them every autumn. He noticed that they lacked intelligence, but there was regular pattern of leaves growing and dropping off at changes of seasons.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People use the Cosmological argument to claim that this uncaused cause has to be God and there is no other explanation that could change that the initial cause of the universe is God. According to William L. Rowe in “The Cosmological Argument”, the cosmological argument has several key elements that make the argument into one that is to be taken into…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A. For Thomas philosophy is ancilla theologiae (handmaiden of theology). Aquinas was first and foremost a theologian, though he was quite capable of distinguishing philosophy proper from theology. He held that…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This particular argument is also in favor if the idea that God does in fact exist, but Aquinas has a different explanation from Anselm. Thomas Aquinas presents the argument known as the “Cosmological” or “first cause”. In a few words, this means that Aquinas believes there must have been a first cause in the world. Aquinas argues that the proof of Gods existence is based on the basis of experiences. God must exist because every being that is dependent for existence was caused by something else that happened prior to it. He believes either there is a boundless chain of contingent beings that is extending backwards or there is a first cause, something that was not caused by something else but began everything else. But in reality, there cannot be a continuous chain extending backwards. Therefore; there is a first cause, something that was not caused by anything else but started everything else that currently exists. Aquinas claims the existence of God can be proven in five ways: Argument from motion, Nature of efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and Governance of the world. Aquinas gives us an argument that is not hard to interpret. There must have been one who created mankind, constructing the world one being at a time. It is very easy to go along with the idea that there is one person or thing that created everything else. While this argument is clear and…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This first cause is God. Or put another way, the universe could not just exist on its own—someone or something must have made it. This cause of the universe is God” (Theological Studies). The Cosmological Argument states that every true contingent proposition…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, this argument is illogical, as there is no need to go further back to find a necessary cause. Moreover, the suggestion that God must be this ‘necessary being’ seems to be too easy of a conclusion – why, without any reasoning, has God been decided as the one being that does not need a cause of its own? It seems rather a dogmatic assumption that God is the only necessary being, when, logically, many other things could be…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    St. Thomas Aquinas presents one of the earliest teleological arguments in his Summa Theologica. Aquinas argues that anything with knowledge moves toward and end or cause. But, natural bodies, or planets, do not have knowledge and they still move toward an end. By an end, Aquinas means that the planets take the same path of orbit around the sun. Thus, Aquinas argues, if an unintelligent body is moving toward an end, it must be directed by an intelligent being. This intelligent being must be God (Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Article 3, Question…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What came to exist first the chicken or the egg? without the chicken, the egg could not be created but was it not the chicken who laid the egg? This story is an endless story and we may never know the answer. This story is a great example of the cosmological argument. In order to comprehend the cosmological argument, we first have to explain its meaning.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays