Preview

Thomas Hardy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
525 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Hardy
The Caribbean Court of Justice is a viable alternative to the Privy Council as a court of last resort for countries of the Commonwealth Caribbean

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council is one of the highest courts in the United Kingdom. Established by the Judicial Committee Act 1833 to hear appeals formerly heard by the King in Council it is the highest Court of Appeal for several independent Commonwealth countries the British Overseas Territories and the British Crown dependencies. It is often referred to as the Privy Council as in most cases appeals are made “ Her Majesty in Council” who the refers the case to the Judicial Committee for “advice” the “report” of the Judicial Committee is always accepted by the Queen in Council as judgment. The panel of judges hearing a particular case is known as “the Board.” The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council has jurisdictions in the following domestic matters:
Appeals against schemes of the Church Commissioners
Appeals from the ecclesiastical courts in non-doctrinal faculty areas
Appeals from the High Court of Chivalry
Appeals from the Court of Admiralty of the Cinque Ports
Appeals from Prize Courts
Appeals from Disciplinary Committee of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons
Disputes under the House of Commons
Disqualification Act 1976
The Caribbean Court of Justice is the judicial institution of the Caribbean community (Caricom) Established in 2001, it is based in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago. The CCJ sits at 134Henry Street in Port of Spain. The Caribbean Court of Justice has two jurisdictions: an original and an appellate jurisdiction.

In its original, the CCJ interprets and applies the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas and is an international court with compulsory and exclusive jurisdictions in respect of the interpretation of the treaty.
In its appellate jurisdiction, the CCJ hears appeals as the court of last resort in both civil and criminal matters from those member states which

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court of appeal operates within appellate jurisdiction. It has the legal power to alter previous decision of the lower courts.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the main judicial organ of the United Nations. It replaced by the Permanent Court of International Justice after World War II, when it was made part of the UN Charter drafted in San Francisco in 1945, International Court of Justice .…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pol 103 Study Guide

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The ICJ ruled in 2004 that U.S. courts must reconsider the cases of 51 Mexican citizens awaiting death sentences in the U.S. because the accused had not been granted all the rights required by an international consular treaty. The U.S. responded by withdrawing its consent for ICJ jurisdiction and found the U.S. was in breech of its violation.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The high court arbitrates on any disputes which arise between the Commonwealth and the States, or among the States, concerning their respective functions.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    W100 Tma02

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It will then end up if passed with Royal Assent, when it will then become an act.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Judiciary of the United Kingdom is not a single body. Each of the separate legal systems in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland has their own judiciary. The British Judiciary plays a vital part in British Politics. This is unblemished as the judicial system is significantly responsible for a multitude of political roles. The senior judiciary help interpret the meaning of law and directly enforce the rule of law. Similarly they also declare and interpret common law in addition to reviewing executive decision.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texting and Driving

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On February 9, 2011, little Enzo Williams was traveling with his mother, father and his older sister, they had approached a red light and were at a complete stop waiting for the light to turn green, when from out of nowhere a SUV driving at a high rate of speed driven by Sydney Wright smashed into the back of their vehicle. Sydney Wright was texting what was claimed to be a short text message and took the life of this innocent little boy. Enzo’s mother, father, and sister walked away from the wreck as did the driver of the other vehicle Sydney. Enzo suffered a bruised windpipe and a skull fracture; he was transported by ambulance to the nearest hospital where he lived for two short days. He was unable to recover from his injuries, he was 6 months old.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CRIMINAL APPEALS ROUTE

    • 1076 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Following a trial in the Magistrates Court there are two routes of appeal open to a defendant, depending on the basis they want to appeal. If they wish to appeal against conviction or sentence, thy must appeal to the Crown Court. The automatic right of appeal is open to the defendant only. If the defendant wishes to appeal by case stated they must appeal to the Divisional Court of the Queen’s Bench Division (QBD) in the High Court. This method can be used by the defence against a conviction, or by the prosecution if the defendant has been acquitted. This appeal route is based on the fact that a mistake has been made in the application of the law, it is not used very often.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Form 4 Theme 4 Notes

    • 2487 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Read on the Somerset Case and Mansfield Judgement. (Caribbean Experience pg63,Caribbean Story pg 145, Caribbean History for CSEC pg 94)…

    • 2487 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I understand how the principle of double effect could seem to be the perfect compromise between moral theories. For example, a theory such as utilitarianism allows for many bad moral actions to occur. For example, it may morally obligate you to murder if it causes the most amount of good or pleasure. This may go against someone’s belief’s, but utilitarianism would say that it is a necessary action that must be accomplished and therefore utilitarianism calls for many intended bad consequences. Other theories say that one must do no harm and do good.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch08

    • 2456 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The International Court of Justice normally has authority to settle legal disputes only when nations voluntarily submit to its jurisdiction.…

    • 2456 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) is an independent body that was set up in March 1997 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, under the Criminal Appeal Act (CAA) 1995. This body in the past was an experiment which could challenge a criminal conviction or sentence after the court process has finished and it still exists in the present in the English Legal System. This Commission can refer possible cases of miscarriages of justice to the attention of the Court of Appeal to prevent the possibility from miscarriages of justice that had occurred in cases like the Birmingham Six and the Tottenham Three. However, the Criminal Cases Review Commission does not have main power to carry out investigation and instead they rely on the police for this aim; this is doubtful whether the commission is fully effective (Slapper, G. and Kelly, D. 2012-2013).…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the enforcement and recognition of foreign court judgments.3 It has been said that the Convention, which is…

    • 3944 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of a Caribbean Supreme Court is not a new one. From as early as the beginning of the 20th century, opinions were being expressed in support of such a court and at a meeting in 1947, West Indian governors reflected on the need for a West Indian Court of Appeal.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law of Mauritius

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The final court of Appeal of Mauritius is the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. In 2008 and 2010 appeal cases from the decision of the…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays