Preview

Thomas Hobbes: A Basis For Politics

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
123 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Hobbes: A Basis For Politics
Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    American Government Study Guide: the Political Landscape
    • 4775 Words
    • 20 Pages

    American Government Study Guide: the Political Landscape

    The social contract theory is the belief that people are free and equal by natural right , and that this in turn requires that all people give their consent to be governed; espoused by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke and influential in the writing of the Declaration of Independence. Hobbes believed that a monarchial type of government was necessary to restrain humanity’s bestial tendencies because life without government was a “state of nature.” Stating that people will live like animals without rules. On the other hand, John Locke argued that the government’s major responsibility was the preservation of private property. He also denied the right that no king should govern but also that individuals were born with equal and natural rights.…

    • 4775 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Innovative Ideas Of Democracy: Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Innovative Ideas Of Democracy: Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau

    Hobbes added to the ideas of democracy by creating the idea that all men are born bad with an urge for war. He stated that in order to have a stable society, government would be required to strictly watch and govern each citizen. He writes that man should give down their power to a much bigger government in order to maintain a single power that can help control the masses. This bigger…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Rationality In Thomas Hobbes Leviathan
    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rationality In Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

    but such a system would have to take for granted Hobbes’ values and rationality—it would not work ‘right out of the box’ as deontology or utilitarianism does; more on this later.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lord of the Flies--The Evils of Mankind
    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lord of the Flies--The Evils of Mankind

    Thomas Hobbes, an Enlightenment philosopher, claimed that mankind is naturally evil and selfish and will cause conflicts “if any two men desire the same thing, which they nevertheless cannot both enjoy” or have differing opinions, in order to gain more power so that they can freely pursue their selfish desires, especially “during the time men live without a common power” and “in that condition which is called war, every man against every man,” and are therefore incapable of self-governing. Hobbes’ position on human nature is easily observable; intolerance and bigotry causes violence and general public…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Thomas Hobbes: Source Analysis
    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes: Source Analysis

    The source argues that in the name of protecting civil liberties, the mass people have too much of a say over things, and that those strong leaders in power do not "get a chance to serve the common good." The ideology presented in the source is that a single, strong leader provides more stability than a democracy. The source presented advocates in favour of a collective, authoritarian form of government. The philosopher Thomas Hobbes would have supported the source by referring to society's need for a "leviathan" or centralization of power, since he believed that people were incapable of governing themselves. However, this source is not a complete rejection of the values and principles of liberalism as it still maintains democracy as the system of government used, and democracy is…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Thomas Hobbes Contribute To The Enlightenment
    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did Thomas Hobbes Contribute To The Enlightenment

    Hobbes believed in a social contract, an implicit understanding between government and governed. His ideal government would be an absolute monarchy that holds power like a leviathan, a sea monster. John Locke, also an English philosopher, believed that people…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    David Hume: A Famous Philosopher
    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages

    David Hume: A Famous Philosopher

    David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B, thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen, he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes place in order for B to be the result. Hume comes to this conclusion because he maintains that there are secrete causes that cannot be observed by the human eye, thus it is impossible for humans to rationally conclude that one thing caused another…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Enlightenment And Thomas Hobbes
    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Enlightenment And Thomas Hobbes

    Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were naturally selfish, in which he believed that lead people to greed and the ugly human nature of jealousy.“The condition of man . . . is a condition of war of everyone against everyone”.(Thomas Hobbes , https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/10122.Thomas_Hobbes) Also in following the greed, he believed that if there were to be no government, there were aslo to be no peace within the people, athough there were no peace with the neighboring countries.“Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of war, where every man is enemy to every man, the same consequent to the time wherein men live without other security than what their own strength and their own invention shall furnish them withal. In such condition there is no place for industry... no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”(Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan) The social contract was the agreement by in which the people define and limit their individual right;creating an organized society. The social contract was based on an absolute monarchy in which the people would later disagree to and make their revolution. The claim made by Thomas Hobbes, had a major influence on the American Democracy and the French Revolution because of the fears that the people had during this time of…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Hobbes Have Rebelled?
    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should Hobbes Have Rebelled?

    Hobbes would argue that the insurgents should not have rebelled, that they have no right that they deserve whatever punishment the Sovereign wants to give them. Hobbes would have said that if it was not for the rebels, the Sovereign would have been able to fight the Islamic State when they first started. After defeating this other Commonwealth, the Islamic State, the Syrian government could have worked to improve the situation for all its subjects. But now that the Commonwealth is in a State of War, the State of Nature exist and the Commonwealth known as Syria is no more. People will eventually want peace and this is when they are going to decide to create a new Commonwealth and choose a new Sovereign. Hobbes would argue that Monarchy would…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Locke Research Paper
    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Locke Research Paper

    He believes that people who can’t agree will end up in war which causes destruction in mankind. Considering that Thomas Hobbes was around his mid-50s when the English Civil War happened. Hobbes must have been traumatized by the violence making him believe that people are corrupt and are selfish and horrible. Despite Hobbes thinking, I believe it's wrong for him to judge all of humanity based on a certain event that occurred devastatingly in his life. He should have seen the positivity in people rather than the negativity.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Enlightenment Thinkers
    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Enlightenment Thinkers

    Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher of the 1600's, tried to create a science of politics. After witnessing the horrors of the English Civil War, Hobbes decided that conflict was part of human nature. Without governments to keep order, Hobbes said, there would be "war of everyone against everyone". In this state of nature life would be "nasty, brutish, and short." In his book Leviathan, Hobbes argued that to escape such a bleak life, people gave up their rights to a strong ruler. In exchange, they gained law and order. Hobbes called this agreement, by which people created a government, the social contract. Hobbes basically saw people as naturally selfish and violent.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Stuart Mill
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes and John Stuart Mill

    In regards to Hobbes, he believed in the natural right of self-preservation. He believed that human beings are greedy and have unlimited desires; they overuse their individual judgments and act on instinct, rather than reasoned responses, which is why there is great insecurity and instability in the state of nature. Hobbes also came up with the social contract theory, which states that we give the power to one individual and in doing this, we lose some of our own rights for the good of society. Ultimately, the effectiveness of the social contract depends on our ability as a society to obtain a satisfactory balance between what we want and what we are prepared to give up for it (“The Human Project” 148). Hobbes argued for an autocracy because it would be a strong-central government and would have power over all issues. However, in order for the country to be politically and socially stable, we would have to give up not only some of our desires but most of our rights as well.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes and Rene Descartes
    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes and Rene Descartes

    <center><i>"Politics should be the application of the science Of man to the construction of the community" Explain this remark and discuss what reasons there might be for thinking it is not true</i></center><br><br>In this essay I intend to examine the political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes and Rene Descartes, in particular their ideas relating to the science of man, and attempt to explain why their ideas prove that it is not possible to construct a science of man.<br><br>I will also briefly mention the philosophy of Donald Davidson in regards to a science of man.<br><br>The theories of Hobbes and the contemporary socio-biologists attempt to recognise how man works and on that basis build a society.<br><br>"Hobbes wished to be seen as the inventor of the science of politics" (Sorrell, p45) He went about this by looking at the psychology of man and discovering that man is a mechanism. Hobbes wanted to understand mechanics. He wanted to look at why men live the way that they do in society and therefore, breaks it down. By doing this he discovered that people are cogs in the social machine. Therefore he wants to examine this cogs to achieve an understanding of the social mechanism, and does this by looking at the psychology of the mind. <br><br>Hobbes is both an empirist and a materialist. Empirists believe that sense gives all knowledge. Generally, they do not believe in astrology, god, electrons etc. Their philosophy is summed up by saying that all things that give true knowledge can be sensed. Materialists believe that all things in existence are physical matter. In other words, the soul and the spirit do not exist.<br><br>Therefore Hobbes believes that thoughts are material, that they are caused by sense and vice versa.<br><br>Tom Sorrell suggests in his essay, entitled "Hobbes' scheme of the sciences", that rather than have knowledge of how the mechanics of the mind's passions work, a more successful way of gaining political knowledge is to understand what these…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes State Of War
    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page

    Thomas Hobbes State Of War

    Thomas Hobbes claims that man’s life is brief and filled with loneness, nastiness, and cruelness. For that reason, he defines the state of nature to state of war. Furthermore, he asserts that this wretched state of human life can be ended when individuals agreed in a social contract. Through the social contract, he believes the absolute authority can protect individuals in exchange of giving up their right.…

    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Social Contract: Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau
    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Social Contract: Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau

    Hobbes feels that mans craving for power and natural state of war is controlled by the social contract, therefore maintaining mans existence.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics