Preview

Thomas More's Utopian Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2069 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas More's Utopian Government
Thomas More describes an ideal society and government where people maintain high moral standard and live with ultimate freedom and happiness. In the Utopia, the Utopian government strive to fulfill and optimize the benefits and happiness of Utopian citizens. Reasonably, people would describe a safe and happy government as domestically stable and diplomatically powerful so that it obtains admiration and fear from both its citizens and surrounding countries, thus enabling its citizens to live with freedom and pursue the ultimate happiness. However, although the images of Utopian government are attractive and appealing, Machiavelli would reprimand the existence of this ideal government to be absurd and unrealistic because of its unreasonable equality …show more content…
The overruling of government allows citizens to forget about their original traces and be fully united under the current government. The sense of belonging help government stabilize the states and easily take people into its possession. Differently, Utopian adopt equality and democracy in its foundation of government. Thirty households elect an administrators known as syphogrant, and the two hundreds syphogrant elect their chief executive (Utopia, P. 96). The election process is democratic and government officials are derived based on the endorsement of their citizens. However, it is equality and democracy that make the government fragile because government officials are elected by the people so they possess the honor to serve citizens wholeheartedly, but if some rules are necessary to be made against the will of their citizens, they would feel abashed and reluctant to execute. Consequently, government is so ascribed to the decision of their citizens, thus losing the domestic authority. Machiavelli does not permit the intimacy between government and people as he states that it is much safer …show more content…
Because Utopian detest war, so they never intentionally initiate war to other countries, and they only conduct war when it is necessary. Even when the war become necessary, Utopian government would not risk their citizens but instead hire mercenaries and auxiliaries to fight the war for them (Utopia, Of Warfare). The benevolence of Utopian government protects their citizens from risk, but their citizens do not receive qualified fighting training, and the heavy reliance on mercenaries could gradually convert Utopian to take them for granted. As Machiavelli explains in the Prince, mercenaries and auxiliaries are useless and dangerous troops because they are not brave enough and value the wealth they gain from war so they are hired at the risk of betraying their employers. Even Utopian realize that mercenaries are able to abandon them when higher value contracts are offered, but they still hire mercenaries because they think the occupation of infinite amount of treasure which they do not appreciate allows them to provide the most appealing offer which cannot be rejected (Utopia, P. 140). However, since mercenaries only cherish money as the criterion for whether they continue to fight, they are not stable and loyal troops. Utopian frequently let others to firstly decide the triumph and fate of their countries and when they eventually sense the trepidation of war, they realize they need to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavellian society a prince rules over the princedom. The prince has several ministers help him to decide on issues of state. The prince has final say in all matters and does not need the approval of the ministers. In Utopian society each household is divided into thirty members with an administrator called a phylarch. Every ten phylarchs answer to a senior phylarch. The senior phylarch all go to meetings under a chief executive to discuss the state issues.…

    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli's The Prince, hints of future democratic theories can be pulled out of Machiavelli's plan for the success of a prince of a state. Within Machiavelli's concentration of plotting out successful achievement of a stabilized state within a principality, he often reveals the importance of the satisfaction the people within the governing walls of that principality. One of the themes to Machiavelli's plan included the dismissal of the affection of virtue of the nobility as well as the significance of an honest people. Even though Machiavelli may have had other motivation for the writing of "The Prince",…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    More’s Utopian society was a work of fiction with the writer exhibiting what would be considered as an ideal community that differed from the medieval view and adopted a modernist approach. In his book, Utopia, More’s main features highlight an ideal society and has been adopted today, to an extent by the society. In Utopia, the structure of the community about marriage and family is idealized. Premarital sex is severely punished and families adopt a traditional structure with elders at the head of the household. In politics and government structure, Utopians are pacifists and uphold moral and ethical practices that are well defined in the society today (Engeman 140). Work and economy in the modern society are held in high regard with everyone…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's the Prince

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "The state is the highest achievement of man, a progressive and elaborate creation of his free will. The individual, the leader, the people, cooperate in maintaining it." This idea of state was put forth by Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince, which was in essence a ruler's handbook to governing and maintaining his land. Machiavelli conjured his theories for government by basing his ideas in his belief that men, especially men in power, tend to follow the same directions, and therefore by looking at past leaders and their follies we can better determine how to run a state. "Men are always the same and are animated by the same passions that lead them fatally to the same decisions, acts, an results…. That one can foresee the course of political development by mediating upon the cycles and phases of historical events, and that essential to a statesman is not only the experience of modern events and constant study of the past. But also the ability to exploit this knowledge in actual political actions."…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government -controlled by a group of people- stands behind every nation’s failure and success. Its main purpose is to improve or maintain the wellbeing of the nations all over the world. The government’s duty is to protect, to ensure a place for home and means of living hood, and to keep peace between other countries. This is the reason why it is important to have the right leaders in our country. Every country has its own kind of government - based on economics, politics or authority - but there is a possible method to be allied with each other. The majority of people think that a great government is chosen by its citizens, which will allow changes and improvement. For example, when it comes to laws ,civilians do not want to have conditions…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli intended The Prince to serve as a guide to creating and holding on to a principality. In it, he also characterizes a "good" society and the necessary tools for building one. Although Machiavelli conceives the republic as being the most practical form of government, he reasons that it is still possible to create a good society under a monarchy, as long as the leader of the monarchy follows the stipulated guidelines. Machiavelli realized that humans are predisposed to act perniciously and therefore it is the responsibility of the prince to exploit that nature in a way that will benefit society as a whole. In this way, Machiavelli's prince is an ideal crafted from the actual, rather than an actual crafted from the ideal.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Politics, religion, social structure, and economics are necessary components of a society. The European countries in the late fifteenth century were in competition with each other to perfect these ideas. They wanted more power, wealth, resources, and perfection of society. They wanted to create utopia. But what is a utopia?…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under this system, what is the balance between the people and the government? How much power do the people have? In Machiavelli’s system, the monarch has all the power and the people have no power. In order to stay in power, the ruler can use dishonesty and cruelty to his…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “But what is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli analyses the strengths and weaknesses of both auctorial governments and monarchal governments in his works The Prince and The Discourses. According to Machiavelli, governments, no matter what form they take, descend into corruption. Aristocracies become oligarchy’s, monarchies become tyrannous, etc. (Machiavelli, 111). Thus, Machiavelli states that the superlative governmental system is for all three forms of ‘good governments’ to be combined under one constitution. In this way, each form of government is better able to keep the others in check. However, Machiavelli favors the republican form of government over principalities because he believes it is better able to stave off corruption and is able to make better decisions.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Study Guide

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People delegate power to govt. as a majority rule – TACIT CONSENT. If govt. unruly, people rebel.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince and Utopia

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A big difference in Utopia and the Prince is that Machiavelli believes that the ruler should be evil under all its intent and More wants a ruler who does not always need to strike fear into their citizens. Machiavelli explains that "people are by nature changeable." (The Prince) This quote shows that he believes it is easy to control people and provides his reasoning to write a book on what to do to look and be powerful. Machiavelli makes it important the regular human can be easily swayed when you are being seen as a powerful being. More's world may not be perfect, but it is the closest to an ideal society. The people in the world always act for the benefit of the whole society. They do not think of themselves but rather for the good of all the people so their world may progress.…

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays