Titina Loizidou to just satisfaction. At the result of this process curt decide to investigate the case following six months.
After the six months the Court gave its judgment about the case of Mrs. Titina Loizidou. The Court decided to reject the Turkey side’s claim that because of Article 50 there is no official right of applicant to just satisfaction. In contrast, said that Turkey government has to compensate pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and legal costs and expenses.
Because of pecuniary damage which is about applicant Mrs. Titina Loizidou’s economic and financial damage emerged as the result of violation of her property rights by Turkey troops, the court decided she have to compensate for the amount of CYP 300,000 by the Turkish government.
Because of Non-pecuniary damage which is about compensation of Mrs. Titina Loizidou’s undesirable feelings and harm of moral values, the Court decided that the respondent has to pay for the amount of CYP