Preview

Title Vii

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
832 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Title Vii
1. Based upon the scenario, does the employee have a legally viable claim for quid pro quo sexual harassment and/or hostile environment sexual harassment? What is the likely outcome?
Based upon the scenario the employee has a legally viable claim for both quid pro quo sexual harassment and hostile environment sexual harassment. Quid pro quo sexual harassment occurs when a workplace benefit is promised, given to, or withheld from the harassed by the harasser in exchange for sexual activity by the harass. In this scenario, quid pro quo sexual harassment could be brought against her boss for demanding the employee travel and stay in the same hotel room as himself or else face consequences which resulted in her being demoted to the mailroom and receiving a pay cut. This was exacerbated by his comment concerning seeing her “amazing breasts” that a previous employee had commented about thus creating a hostile sexual environment between the two of them. The employee also has a viable claim for hostile environment sexual harassment in regards to her co-worker who has made numerous sexual comments concerning her breasts. Hostile environment sexual harassment occurs when the activity by the harasser towards the harassed is unwanted, is based on the harasser’s gender, creates a hostile or abusive work environment, and unreasonably interferes with harassee’s ability to do his or her job. She advised the co-worker that the comments made her uncomfortable and to stop but the comments continued. The co-worker took it a step further by stealing and downloading and altering a photo of her on his computer. The likely outcome is that the employer will be held responsible and will have to pay punitive damages.

2. Analyze the legal factors for the potential claim(s) in the context of the employee pursuing legal action against the employer.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) defines sexual harassment as follows: "Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hrm593 Week 3 Assignment

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Based upon the scenario, does the employee have a legally viable claim for quid pro quo sexual harassment and/or hostile environment sexual harassment? What is the likely outcome?…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bsbwor501 Unit 2

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sexual harassment still exists within our workforce today. A quid pro quo occurrence is less likely to happen because of Title VII bring them from behind closed door; however working in a hostile work environment still reigns ramped. Though both sexes are subjected to this treatment, the fairer sex is usually the victim. In this individual project a supervisor on a work visa has been repeatedly sexually harassing 2 female employees. Even though the supervisor’s superior has been alerted of his behavior, it continues for 3 months. Whether the supervisor on work visa is unfamiliar with…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Issue: Can an employer be held vicariously liable when the sexual harassment conduct of its employees is so severe that the victim of the harassment resigns?…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hrm 593

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brittany was dealing with a hostile work environment, relating to inappropriate behavior made by a co-worker. She personally saw him gazing at a photo of herself in a bathing suit and making offensive comments about the way she looks. She asked him if he could stop with the comments because it made her feel uncomfortable. She later found that he scanned the photo of her to his computer. We she confronting him again, Robert went to her supervisor complaining and stating were not performing according her job responsibilities. When Brittany went to her supervisor regarding the issues, she experienced quid pro quo from her supervisor. She was informed that would be going on a business trip with him, which she never had to do before. And let him know she prefer that she does not have to travel, but was it was work related and they would be sharing a room. Then he told her that if she would show him her breast while traveling, she would get promoted. With both of these instances that happened at work Brittany has a strong case for sexual harassment and quid pro quo in the workplace. I feel that both the supervisor an co-worker should be immediately terminated. This needs to be shown as an example that sexual harassment of any kind is not tolerated. The organization should also be held responsible for the simple fact that one of their supervisors who should have been responsible for enforcing this type of thing with her direct employees was a responsible acting party. I feel that Brittany should stay employed with the company, but yet by her choice move to a different floor or position of her choice and be financially compensated.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tends to reinforce the stereotype (e.g. she’s only here because she’s a woman and there was a quota – first time she makes a mistake will reinforce the stereotype)…

    • 3578 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The company should come up with strict policies of sexual harassment that is within the law. These laws should be applied to everyone regardless of their position if they are found liable for the offence. This would create an environment where people respect the privacy of others as enshrine in the bill of right. It also promotes fairness because no able would feel that he/she is above the law. This will send a strong signal to any employee on the seriousness of the case.…

    • 3064 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief Meritor Sav

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (a) The language of Title VII is not limited to "economic" or "tangible" discrimination. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Guidelines fully support the view that sexual harassment leading to non-economic injury can violate Title VII. Here, respondent's allegations were sufficient to state a claim for "hostile environment" sexual harassment. Pp. 477 U. S. 63-67.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title Vii Case

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Which actions by the two employees that call their credibility into question are you allowed, as an employer, to consider? Or, what types of actions are you not allowed to use and why? Are there any you wish you could use?…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In quid pro quo, the person filing a claim must prove the employer has used their authority (supervisor, manager, etc.) to make decisions of employment actions in exchange for sexual favors from the employee/applicant. This can be sexual favors in exchange for “job benefits, promotion, employment, salary increases, shift or work assignments, performance expectations and other conditions” (Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment). This is a form of sexual harassment but differs in that it typically means a sexual favor is being offered and/or requested in order to gain something from it, like a promotion or pay raise. This is considered an abuse of power and can be a violation of tort law. To prove this, you must prove that “you belong to a protected group; you were subject to unwelcome sexual…

    • 4261 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sexual harassment has been broken down into two types, Quid Pro Quo and hostile environment. Quid Pro Quo means “This for that” (Broderick) It demands sex in exchange for benefits to which a person is otherwise entitled. Quid Pro Quo may also occur when a supervisor makes sexual conduct of an employee a condition for employment benefits or advancement, or a condition for avoiding adverse employment action. (Broderick) Quid Pro Quo is sexual propositions, unwanted graphic discussion of sexual acts, and commentary on the employee’s body and the sexual uses to which it could be put. Quid Pro Quo is the most commonly recognized form of sexual harassment. This form of harassment is often prohibited as a matter of criminal law. The employers are…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sexual harassment is perhaps best defined as unwelcome verbal, visual or physical conduct that is of a sexual nature. (“Sexual harassment in,”). According to the EECO website both the claims and monetary rewards associated with sexual have dropped drastically over the past decade.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gm520 You Decide

    • 2973 Words
    • 12 Pages

    In response to the request on potential liability to the sexual harassment case brought by Virginia Pollard, the company is vicariously liable for the conduct of its employees even though there is a sexual harassment policy in place. Virginia had become a victim of a hostile work environment supported by a supervisor with immediate authority over the employee. Pollard was working in a very stressful environment in which she (being the only female) was a minority being subjected to inappropriate language and other unwanted and uninvited behavior. Pollard was humiliated on a daily basis (i.e. pranks involving taping her drawers shut, locking her out of the guard shack, having a forklift backing up to the guard shack and backfiring into her ear) and also upset with the lack of support from her manager.…

    • 2973 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the scenario other things are mentioned for hypothetical purpose but work place harassment is very serious and come and I have dealt with it many times. This harassment takes many forms; unwelcome action toward an employee that makes the employee unable to do their job can cause a person to believe they are working in a hostile environment. The harassment can be based on seniority/authority (quid pro quo), sexual, racial, and religious along with other protected classes. In this case it is again clear that it is sexual harassment based on her gender, coupled with the quid pro quo in the threat to use his seniority to have her fired, not to mention the fact he committed a criminal assault if she pressed the issue is all well enough to make this a hostile work…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I will first start by defining sexual harassment. Sexual harassment is broken up into two behaviors. As defined by the EEOC the two types of harassments are quid pro quo and hostile environment. These are two different types of harassments that go on in the work place but they can both happen to you. Quid pro quo is one of the most common forms of sexual harassment in which a person of higher power targets a person who is trying to succeed in the workplace by giving them salary increases shifted schedules, and promotions in return for sexual favors. For example the case of Priest v. Rotary, in which a California waitress was given the worst shifts to work and eventually fired because she resisted her managers fondling, and kissing (Smalensky 1999). Another form of sexual harassment in the work place is called hostile environment. Hostile environment is unwelcome verbal or physical conduct based on race, color,…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Sexual Harassment Act

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (1)The sexual favor is made as a condition in the hiring or in the employment, re-employment or continued employment of said individual, or in granting said individual favorable compensation, terms, conditions, promotions, or privileges; or the refusal to grant the sexual favor results in…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays