Tlo Argumentative Essay

TLO argued that her Fourth Amendment rights were violated, but why? In 1984, a teacher found two girls in the New Jersey school bathroom smoking cigarettes. They were then sent to the principal's office for interrogation. Immediately the second girl admitted to this crime, but TLO held her own. TLO was a 14-year-old girl named Tracy Lois Odem, she remained anonymous until recently.The principal, Ted Choplick, demanded that he searches her purse. Choplick found rolls, paraphernalia-marijuana, money, a list of names, and a box of cigarettes, he then excluded the contents. After being arrested TLO said due to the Fourth Amendment, stating “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”, that Choplick invaded her privacy, which is unconstitutional TLO appealed to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations of Middlesex County NJ. Where TLO faced delinquency charges along with one year of probation. They said under certain circumstances her purse can be checked, they also said Choplick had constitutional rights with reasonable suspicion.
It was also agreed that the
The court case affects schools by setting new rules and expectations from students. In a public school, there is no fear that the student next to you is withholding drugs or illegal substances. Just like it affects all students, we do not have to fear of violence or illegal activity. Lastly, it affects you. Your expectations and rules are different because of what has happened in the past. The TLO case affects how schools do things. They can search lockers, bags and any personal property within reason. Simple things as a court case can affect everything around