Preview

To what entend is the behaviour of Richard III due to dysfunctional family relationship?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1069 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what entend is the behaviour of Richard III due to dysfunctional family relationship?
Richard III dominates the play. The first three acts reveal a character who is self-centred, irreligious, ruthless, vindictive, cruel, hypocritical, blasphemous and lacking any moral scruples in his eager search for power. He possesses a ferocious intellect, has vast reserves of energy, and delights in concealing his secret and evil plans.
In his opening speech Richard tells us he is "determined to prove a villain." This is pretty straightforward. Richard is announcing that he has made a decision and is committed to being bad. Richard’s line, ‘I am determined to prove a villain’ foreshadows Shakespeare’s intent for the whole play.
The Yorks have just regained the throne with Edward IV's coronation. “Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this son of York” Richard announces his plan to set his brothers against each other. Richard informs us in the first scene that things have swung round to his family's side, but we immediately learn that he does not value family, as he plans to drive a wedge between his two brothers, Edward and Clarence. “To set my brother Clarence and the king in deadly hate the one against the other”
To accomplish this, he has told his brother, Edward IV, about a prophecy, which says that someone with a name beginning with the letter “G” will murder Edward’s heirs. “A prophecy which says that ‘G’ of Edward’s heirs the murder shall be” This statement works since his name is George, Duke of Clarence. Accordingly, Edward has Clarence sent to the Tower.
We also learn a lot about Richard's character: not only is he responsible for having Clarence imprisoned, but he is incredibly two-faced, letting Clarence believe he will support him in this time of need. “Well, your emprisonment shall not be long. I will deliver you or else lie for you” We know he seems pretty ruthless, likely to do anything necessary to reach his goals.
However this is not enough, Richard is far removed from the throne. Before he can have a legitimate

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is suggested that the Duke of Gloucester did have his sights set on seizing the throne from the moment his brother died because Richard hated the Woodvilles and their influence over Edward V, He would do anything to stop them having control over his country. He believes they have no rights to his brothers role and it is said that he ‘ feared the Woodvilles threatened political exclusion and ruin’ as well as threatening Edward V’s ability to rule.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard tried to end the war of the roses and placate the Lancastrians by honouring Henry VI through a ceremonious reburial, and by trying to build bridges with the Woodvilles by persuading Elizabeth out of protective sanctuary and to attend court whilst paying her an annuity (Elizabeth was born into a Lancastrian family and did marry a minor Lancastrian noble before marrying the Yorkist king). He tried to end the war of the roses because they were unpopular with the kingdom and the nobles. This is a clear demonstration of how he could have been a great king. This is because he is trying to win over defected supporters and gain trust, popularity and an affinity with as many people as possible. It also shows how he tried to gain affinity with the nobility by gaining trust and showing respect to the Lancastrian history.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intrinsic to both texts, there is the notion that art is used to directly influence and impact existing historical perceptions. Shakespeare’s “Richard III” explores this idea, using the most influential artistic medium of the time, theatre, to further publicise the ‘Tudor Myth’ perception. On stage, the visual motif of Richard’s appearance as “deformed, unfinished” reflects his moral deficiencies, reinforced by his soliloquys and asides that expose his underlying treachery. He forges a duplicitous role as both director and actor within the play, stating in the opening soliloquy “plots that I have laid, inductions dangerous…” Richard seemingly ‘stage manages’ the entirety of his world, creating a sense of dramatic irony from the juxtaposing of the different “masks” he feigns in contrast to his true intentions; he plays the role of the “grieving” brother, “Christian prince,” etc. As such, Richard’s meta-theatricality engages us on a psychological level that reinforces the perception of the Tudor Myth given not just the heinous nature of his crimes but the “villainous”…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By analysing the parallels and differences between King Richard III and Looking For Richard, the responder is positioned to appreciate the distinctive contexts from which each text emerged. Whilst an exploration of the moral vices and corruptive consequences of the relentless pursuit of power is explored in both texts, a closer examination of the way power is represented…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, this falls when it is realized that while Richard is honest with us, the audience, he is not honest with those around him or the victims of his crimes and manipulation. Additionally, his honesty with the audience typically comes from a place of gloating about his superior intelligence and evil plots. This means that his honesty neither creates any benefit in the world he lives or comes from a place of positive intention. In summation, Richard’s practical actions cause great harm unto others and bring very minimal benefits. The other excuses Richard attempts to pawn up in the play also fall very quickly under examination.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Deposition of Richard II, it is obvious that the English king was disliked by all. A list of his grievances was drawn up, citing all of his poor choices as king and the reasons why he should be dethroned. The number one cause of the hatred of him was “his evil rule, that is, he has given the goods and possession…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Act 1 scene 4 of “King Richard III”, Shakespeare explores the concept of free will clashing with Providentialism through the debate between Clarence and the two Murderers. Shakespeare juxtaposes Clarence’s dream with his murder in order to affirm the value of Providentialism and the Great Chain of Being which underpinned Elizabethan hierarchical society. On wakening from his dream, Clarence describes the torment of his soul in Hell at the behest of Warwick and the murdered Prince Edward who, “dabbled in blood” demands that the furies “take him in torment”. Clarence accepts his crimes and the punishment which is to be his as a just outcome of Providentialism, praying only that God “spare my guiltless wife and children”. This is immediately juxtaposed with the entrance of the two Murderers who, in their decision to murder a Prince, represent the rising power of secularism and free will. Shakespeare explores this dichotomy in Clarence’s pleas for his life; firstly he appeals to their secular greed, promising that “my brother Gloucester…shall reward you” for his life and, when this fails, asks if they “will war with God” by murdering him. Shakespeare’s use of emotive language such as “beastly, savage, devilish” draws attention to the crisis of…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In December 1483 the bodies of Prince Richard and Prince Henry, only 12 and 9, were found murdered in the Tower of London. The mystery of who killed the boys is still a mystery to this day, however many suspect their uncle Richard III of York. Many historians who recorded the event explicitly express that they’re certain Richard III is responsible, and there’s many valid reasons to support their assumption.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Richard III Fear Quotes

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Richard III is a remarkable, if not irregular, rendition of the renowned historical figure, Richard III. In it, Shakespeare poses Richard as a villain with no remorse towards others—without any fear. This is evident when Richard awakes and holds an internal dialogue in which he berates his conscience for giving him bad dreams. "What do I fear? Myself? There's none else by" (5.5.136). He continues in this vein, first blaming and then defending himself for a short while. Ratcliffe enters and gets…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jane Eyre

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s 16th century historically tragic play, King Richard III and Al Pacino’s 20th century docudrama, Looking for Richard portray parallel themes of war, characterisation of Richard in context and plot. Shakespeare wrote King Richard III during the reign of Elizabeth I and the propaganda during the time supported the Elizabethan monarch. During Looking for Richard’s era, a concept of sheer evil appeared which presented characters whose evil was unmotivated. The issues Shakespeare explored are still experienced in contemporary surrounding, and reflect in Pacino’s text. Both texts explore similar aspects of war, characterisation of Richard in context and plot portraying in different textual forms. Thus, as texts are a reflection of their context, the purpose to connect with their audience remains constant irrespective of context.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diction In Richard III

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Act I Scene I, Richard’s brother Clarence is sent to the tower, the prison, by King Henry. Richard meets him in the tower and talks with him about his imprisonment, blaming it all on the King’s wife. In reality, Richard was indirectly responsible for the imprisonment of Clarence by starting rumors. Richard wanted Clarence in prison because he was in the way of Richard’s way to the throne. However, it does not end with Clarence’s imprisonment. Instead, Richard blames everything on the queen and promises to free Clarence. Thus gaining Clarence’s trust. While Clarence is in prison, he has a terrible dream foreshadowing his death. Following the dream, two murderers come to Clarence on Richard’s behalf. However, Clarence refuses to believe that Richard would do such thing because they were brothers and Richard had sworn his loyalty to him. After some debate, the murderers kill Clarence. It is evident in this scene that Richard used words to gain Clarence’s trust, but then broke it, resulting in his death. Clarence’s death was exactly what Richard wanted as he was in his way to the…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fling

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Edward V was the great-great-great-grandson of Edward III and the son of Edward IV, the previous king, therefore making him have a strong claim to the throne. When his father died he was only 12 years old and so people weren’t sure if he was ready to be king, or if he needed someone to watch over him. His uncle Richard Duke of Gloucester- later known as Richard III- was made protector and guardian of Edward which meant he partly controlled what Edward did. He wasn’t on the throne for very long and so didn’t have much of an influence during his reign. There was a brief conflict with the Woodville’s who were adamant they had more of a claim to the throne, but Richard had them arrested. Richard spread a rumour that Edward V was illegitimate to the throne which was why he needed a protector, however once Richard took the throne both Edward and his brother disappeared in the tower of London and were never seen again.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare also gives great insight on Richard’s mind via diction. In Richard’s opening lines he specifically says, “Our dreadful marches to delightful measures” (1,1,8). Instead of fighting the Lancasters Richard (and his family) are in a time of harmony. He intentionally changes the negative word to a positive. Lines like these are all throughout the opening soliloquy. Richard allows the audience to see that he is at peace, that he is relaxed. By his big soliloquy in Act 5, Richard’s attitude is down. He’s worried about all the deeds he’s done. He directly states, “Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am:” (5,3,211). Not only does he leave the negative word of “murderer” in the sentence, but he…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii Conscience

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The attack of "conscience" that King Richard suffers in Act 5, Scene 5 of Shakespeare's Richard III (133-157) can be seen as the psychological climax of the drama, one that is critical to both Richard's development as a character and the play's ultimate success. Richard's struggle to reconcile the many different roles he attempts to play into one unified self, reflected in the tone and composition of his speech, adds depth and humanity to his character; at the same time, his ultimate failure to maintain his "self-made" identity simplifies the play in a way that allows the author to satisfy his audience by punishing the villain and reaffirming the world views that Richard's character appears to challenge (Luxon). While examining his own vision of himself, Richard finds his identity at a breaking point, and is forced to rely on the very ideas he used for his own advantage to judge himself. As the king, who seemed to be above the "afflict[ion] of "coward conscience" (5.5.133) is overwhelmed by the many different conceptions of who he is that are presented in the play, the audience cannot help but feel a mixture of sympathy and relief.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays